Quantitative analysis of lexical psycholinguistic properties in aphasia discourse production.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Juqiang Chen, Hui Chang
{"title":"Quantitative analysis of lexical psycholinguistic properties in aphasia discourse production.","authors":"Juqiang Chen, Hui Chang","doi":"10.1080/17549507.2025.2557501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to investigate lexical psycholinguistic properties (i.e. age of acquisition, concreteness, imageability, and familiarity) in English spoken discourse by persons with aphasia. It is hypothesised that persons with aphasia are more likely to use words with lower age of acquisition and higher concreteness, imageability and familiarity compared to the control group of neurologically intact adults, reflecting their lexical retrieval difficulties.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Language samples of picture descriptions, story narratives, and procedural discourse were extracted from AphasiaBank. Words in the samples were cross-referenced with lexical items in large-scale psycholinguistic norms.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Persons with aphasia tend to use words with lower age of acquisition in the story narrative task and higher familiarity in both the story narrative and procedural description task compared to the control group, demonstrating difficulties in retrieving later-acquired, and less familiar lexical items. Story narratives were particularly effective in distinguishing the two groups in terms of lexical psycholinguistic properties.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Distinctive patterns of lexical psycholinguistic properties were found in persons with aphasia discourse production compared with the control groups. These findings hold significant clinical implications for speech-language pathologists, as they underscore the value of integrating psycholinguistic measures into assessment protocols to enhance diagnosis accuracy and inform targeted therapeutic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49047,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2025.2557501","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to investigate lexical psycholinguistic properties (i.e. age of acquisition, concreteness, imageability, and familiarity) in English spoken discourse by persons with aphasia. It is hypothesised that persons with aphasia are more likely to use words with lower age of acquisition and higher concreteness, imageability and familiarity compared to the control group of neurologically intact adults, reflecting their lexical retrieval difficulties.

Method: Language samples of picture descriptions, story narratives, and procedural discourse were extracted from AphasiaBank. Words in the samples were cross-referenced with lexical items in large-scale psycholinguistic norms.

Result: Persons with aphasia tend to use words with lower age of acquisition in the story narrative task and higher familiarity in both the story narrative and procedural description task compared to the control group, demonstrating difficulties in retrieving later-acquired, and less familiar lexical items. Story narratives were particularly effective in distinguishing the two groups in terms of lexical psycholinguistic properties.

Conclusion: Distinctive patterns of lexical psycholinguistic properties were found in persons with aphasia discourse production compared with the control groups. These findings hold significant clinical implications for speech-language pathologists, as they underscore the value of integrating psycholinguistic measures into assessment protocols to enhance diagnosis accuracy and inform targeted therapeutic interventions.

失语语篇产生中词汇心理语言学特征的定量分析。
目的:本研究旨在探讨失语症患者英语口语话语中的词汇心理特征(即习得年龄、具体性、可想象性和熟悉度)。假设失语症患者比神经功能健全的对照组更倾向于使用习得年龄较低、具体性、可想象性和熟悉度较高的词汇,这反映了他们的词汇检索困难。方法:从AphasiaBank中提取图片描述、故事叙述和程序语篇的语言样本。将样本中的单词与大规模心理语言规范中的词汇项目进行交叉对照。结果:与对照组相比,失语症患者在故事叙述任务中倾向于使用习得年龄较低的词汇,在故事叙述和程序描述任务中倾向于使用熟悉程度较高的词汇,表现出检索后习得词汇和不熟悉词汇的困难。故事叙述在词汇心理语言学特性方面特别有效地区分了这两个群体。结论:与对照组相比,失语症患者的话语产生具有明显的词汇心理语言特征。这些发现对语言病理学家具有重要的临床意义,因为它们强调了将心理语言学测量纳入评估协议以提高诊断准确性和告知有针对性的治疗干预的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
73
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is an international journal which promotes discussion on a broad range of current clinical and theoretical issues. Submissions may include experimental, review and theoretical discussion papers, with studies from either quantitative and/or qualitative frameworks. Articles may relate to any area of child or adult communication or dysphagia, furthering knowledge on issues related to etiology, assessment, diagnosis, intervention, or theoretical frameworks. Articles can be accompanied by supplementary audio and video files that will be uploaded to the journal’s website. Special issues on contemporary topics are published at least once a year. A scientific forum is included in many issues, where a topic is debated by invited international experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信