Preparing our medical students to care for an aging population: implementation of a fall risk assessment curriculum.

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Sarah Bland, Samantha Syms, Maria H van Zuilen
{"title":"Preparing our medical students to care for an aging population: implementation of a fall risk assessment curriculum.","authors":"Sarah Bland, Samantha Syms, Maria H van Zuilen","doi":"10.1080/02701960.2025.2568603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical schools must prepare their trainees to address the common problems facing an aging society. We developed a medical student curriculum on mobility and fall risk assessment that culminates in a formative standardized patient (SP) activity. We present this curriculum focusing on our growth-oriented multisource feedback approach. Following a didactic session, students participate in an SP encounter, a note station, and a self-assessment. Each student is provided with a highly individualized feedback report broken down by five skills evaluated by the SP, a faculty rater and/or the student themselves. Skills include 1) communication/professionalism, 2) physical examination, 3) history taking/reporting, 4) assessment and care planning, and 5) self-assessment. Each skill is graded as \"exceeds,\" \"meets,\" \"partially meets,\" or \"does not meet expectations.\" Detailed formative comments are provided regardless of level of performance. Of the 397 students who completed the curriculum, 157 (39.5%) had at least one skill not fully meeting expectations. Forty-three students (10.9%) had two skills, nine students (2.3%) had three skills, and three students (0.8%) had four skills not fully meeting expectations. While students overall performed at a high level, the detailed formative feedback provided each student with a clear path for growth and improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":46431,"journal":{"name":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2025.2568603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical schools must prepare their trainees to address the common problems facing an aging society. We developed a medical student curriculum on mobility and fall risk assessment that culminates in a formative standardized patient (SP) activity. We present this curriculum focusing on our growth-oriented multisource feedback approach. Following a didactic session, students participate in an SP encounter, a note station, and a self-assessment. Each student is provided with a highly individualized feedback report broken down by five skills evaluated by the SP, a faculty rater and/or the student themselves. Skills include 1) communication/professionalism, 2) physical examination, 3) history taking/reporting, 4) assessment and care planning, and 5) self-assessment. Each skill is graded as "exceeds," "meets," "partially meets," or "does not meet expectations." Detailed formative comments are provided regardless of level of performance. Of the 397 students who completed the curriculum, 157 (39.5%) had at least one skill not fully meeting expectations. Forty-three students (10.9%) had two skills, nine students (2.3%) had three skills, and three students (0.8%) had four skills not fully meeting expectations. While students overall performed at a high level, the detailed formative feedback provided each student with a clear path for growth and improvement.

准备我们的医学生照顾老龄化人口:实施跌倒风险评估课程。
医学院必须让他们的学员准备好解决老龄化社会面临的共同问题。我们开发了一套医学生的活动能力和跌倒风险评估课程,最终形成了标准化的患者活动。我们介绍这门课程的重点是我们以成长为导向的多源反馈方法。在一个教学课程之后,学生们参加一个SP会议,一个笔记站和一个自我评估。每个学生都有一份高度个性化的反馈报告,由SP、教师评分员和/或学生自己评估五项技能。技能包括1)沟通/专业,2)身体检查,3)病史记录/报告,4)评估和护理计划,5)自我评估。每项技能都被分为“超过”、“达到”、“部分达到”或“未达到预期”。无论表现水平如何,都会提供详细的形成性评论。在完成课程的397名学生中,157名(39.5%)至少有一项技能没有完全达到预期。43名学生(10.9%)有2项技能,9名学生(2.3%)有3项技能,3名学生(0.8%)有4项技能不完全符合预期。虽然学生们总体表现良好,但详细的形成性反馈为每个学生提供了一条清晰的成长和改进之路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
18.80%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Gerontology & Geriatrics Education is geared toward the exchange of information related to research, curriculum development, course and program evaluation, classroom and practice innovation, and other topics with educational implications for gerontology and geriatrics. It is designed to appeal to a broad range of students, teachers, practitioners, administrators, and policy makers and is dedicated to improving awareness of best practices and resources for gerontologists and gerontology/geriatrics educators. Peer Review Policy: All research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by two anonymous referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信