Effects of tear size on outcomes after acellular dermal matrix-augmented rotator cuff repair.

IF 1.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Ji-Hun Park, Jung-Han Kim, Hyung-Jun Koo
{"title":"Effects of tear size on outcomes after acellular dermal matrix-augmented rotator cuff repair.","authors":"Ji-Hun Park, Jung-Han Kim, Hyung-Jun Koo","doi":"10.5397/cise.2025.00745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) patch augmentation in rotator cuff repair reinforces the repaired tendon and provides additional structural support. This study aimed to compare outcomes based on rotator cuff tear size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent ADM-augmented rotator cuff repair at two hospitals between April 2021 and April 2023. After excluding subjects with <2 years of follow-up or no magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 6 months, patients were grouped based on tear size: ≤30 mm (group 1) and >30 mm (group 2). Outcomes were American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant-Murley score, University of California, Los Angeles score, pain visual analog scale score, and range of motion (ROM). Retear was defined based on Sugaya type 4-5 on 6-month MRI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant improvement in postoperative clinical outcomes compared with preoperative outcomes, with no significant intergroup differences. ROM gains were limited overall, with significant increases only in group 1 for forward flexion and scaption. Stiffness occurred in 4.8% of group 1 and 17.9% of group 2 patients. Retear was found in 1 of 21 patients (4.8%) in group 1 and 7 of 28 (25.0%) in group 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with ADM patch augmentation showed reduced retear rates and improved clinical outcomes across tear sizes. Postoperative ROM improvements were limited, and stiffness tended to occur more frequently in larger tears. Thus, the success of ADM patch augmentation depends on patient selection and appropriate graft application. Level of evidence: III.</p>","PeriodicalId":33981,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2025.00745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) patch augmentation in rotator cuff repair reinforces the repaired tendon and provides additional structural support. This study aimed to compare outcomes based on rotator cuff tear size.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent ADM-augmented rotator cuff repair at two hospitals between April 2021 and April 2023. After excluding subjects with <2 years of follow-up or no magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 6 months, patients were grouped based on tear size: ≤30 mm (group 1) and >30 mm (group 2). Outcomes were American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant-Murley score, University of California, Los Angeles score, pain visual analog scale score, and range of motion (ROM). Retear was defined based on Sugaya type 4-5 on 6-month MRI.

Results: Both groups showed significant improvement in postoperative clinical outcomes compared with preoperative outcomes, with no significant intergroup differences. ROM gains were limited overall, with significant increases only in group 1 for forward flexion and scaption. Stiffness occurred in 4.8% of group 1 and 17.9% of group 2 patients. Retear was found in 1 of 21 patients (4.8%) in group 1 and 7 of 28 (25.0%) in group 2.

Conclusions: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with ADM patch augmentation showed reduced retear rates and improved clinical outcomes across tear sizes. Postoperative ROM improvements were limited, and stiffness tended to occur more frequently in larger tears. Thus, the success of ADM patch augmentation depends on patient selection and appropriate graft application. Level of evidence: III.

撕裂大小对脱细胞真皮基质增强肩袖修复术后疗效的影响。
背景:脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)贴片增强在肩袖修复中加强修复的肌腱并提供额外的结构支持。本研究旨在比较基于肩袖撕裂大小的结果。方法:我们回顾性分析了2021年4月至2023年4月在两家医院接受adm增强肩袖修复的患者。排除30 mm的受试者后(第二组)。结果包括美国肩关节外科医生评分、Constant-Murley评分、加州大学洛杉矶分校评分、疼痛视觉模拟量表评分和活动范围(ROM)。6个月MRI诊断为Sugaya 4-5型复发。结果:两组患者术后临床预后较术前均有明显改善,组间差异无统计学意义。总的来说,ROM的增加是有限的,只有第1组的前屈和脱位有显著的增加。组1患者僵硬率为4.8%,组2患者僵硬率为17.9%。1组21例患者中有1例(4.8%)复发,2组28例患者中有7例(25.0%)复发。结论:关节镜下肩袖修复与ADM补片增强可以降低撕裂率,改善撕裂大小的临床结果。术后ROM改善有限,较大撕裂处更容易出现僵硬。因此,ADM补片增强的成功取决于患者的选择和合适的移植物应用。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信