Explainable SHAP-XGBoost models for identifying important social factors associated with the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score using the LASSO feature selection technique.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jungtae Choi, Jooeun Jeon, Hyoeun An, Hyeon Chang Kim
{"title":"Explainable SHAP-XGBoost models for identifying important social factors associated with the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score using the LASSO feature selection technique.","authors":"Jungtae Choi, Jooeun Jeon, Hyoeun An, Hyeon Chang Kim","doi":"10.4178/epih.e2025052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Extensive evidence indicates that social factors play an essential role in explaining atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This study aimed to examine which social factors are associated with the estimated 10-year ASCVD risk score among male and female adults, incorporating both multifaceted social network components and conventional risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from 4368 middle-aged Korean adults, we explored factors most likely to explain ASCVD risk with interpretable machine learning algorithms. The ASCVD risk was determined using the 10-year ASCVD risk score, as calculated using pooled cohort equations. Social network components were assessed through the name generator module. A total of 52 variables were included in the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For male participants (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.65), the average years known for network members contributed most to ASCVD risk prediction (mean Shapley additive explanations [SHAP] value = 0.31), followed by spouse's education level (0.22), medical history with diagnosis (0.18), and snoring frequency (0.14). By contrast, for female participants (AUC = 0.60), medical history with diagnosis was the strongest predictor (0.47), followed by logged income (0.21), education level (0.19), and the average number of years known in network members (0.17).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several important social factors were associated with the ASCVD risk score in both male and female adults. However, longitudinal research is needed to determine whether these factors predict future ASCVD events.</p>","PeriodicalId":48543,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Health","volume":" ","pages":"e2025052"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2025052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Extensive evidence indicates that social factors play an essential role in explaining atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This study aimed to examine which social factors are associated with the estimated 10-year ASCVD risk score among male and female adults, incorporating both multifaceted social network components and conventional risk factors.

Methods: Using data from 4368 middle-aged Korean adults, we explored factors most likely to explain ASCVD risk with interpretable machine learning algorithms. The ASCVD risk was determined using the 10-year ASCVD risk score, as calculated using pooled cohort equations. Social network components were assessed through the name generator module. A total of 52 variables were included in the model.

Results: For male participants (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.65), the average years known for network members contributed most to ASCVD risk prediction (mean Shapley additive explanations [SHAP] value = 0.31), followed by spouse's education level (0.22), medical history with diagnosis (0.18), and snoring frequency (0.14). By contrast, for female participants (AUC = 0.60), medical history with diagnosis was the strongest predictor (0.47), followed by logged income (0.21), education level (0.19), and the average number of years known in network members (0.17).

Conclusion: Several important social factors were associated with the ASCVD risk score in both male and female adults. However, longitudinal research is needed to determine whether these factors predict future ASCVD events.

使用LASSO特征选择技术识别与动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险评分相关的重要社会因素的可解释的SHAP-XGBoost模型。
目的:大量证据表明,社会因素在解释动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)中起重要作用。本研究旨在研究哪些社会因素与男性和女性成人10年ASCVD风险评分相关,包括多方面的社会网络成分和传统风险因素。方法:利用4368名韩国中年成年人的数据,我们用可解释的机器学习算法探索最有可能解释ASCVD风险的因素。采用合并队列方程计算的10年ASCVD风险评分确定ASCVD风险。社会网络成分通过名字生成器模块进行评估。模型共包含52个变量。结果:对于男性参与者(受试者工作特征曲线下面积[AUC] = 0.65),已知网络成员的平均年龄对ASCVD风险预测贡献最大(Shapley加性解释均值[SHAP]值= 0.31),其次是配偶的受教育程度(0.22)、诊断病史(0.18)和打鼾频率(0.14)。相比之下,对于女性参与者(AUC = 0.60),诊断病史是最强的预测因子(0.47),其次是记录收入(0.21),教育水平(0.19)和网络成员已知的平均年数(0.17)。结论:几个重要的社会因素与男性和女性成人的ASCVD风险评分有关。然而,需要进行纵向研究来确定这些因素是否能预测未来的ASCVD事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epidemiology and Health
Epidemiology and Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.60%
发文量
106
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology and Health (epiH) is an electronic journal publishing papers in all areas of epidemiology and public health. It is indexed on PubMed Central and the scope is wide-ranging: including descriptive, analytical and molecular epidemiology; primary preventive measures; screening approaches and secondary prevention; clinical epidemiology; and all aspects of communicable and non-communicable diseases prevention. The epiH publishes original research, and also welcomes review articles and meta-analyses, cohort profiles and data profiles, epidemic and case investigations, descriptions and applications of new methods, and discussions of research theory or public health policy. We give special consideration to papers from developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信