{"title":"[Predictors of Adverse Events Following Physical Restraint in Internal Medicine Ward Patients: An Exploratory Study].","authors":"Hui-Ting Lin, Gong-Hong Lin","doi":"10.6224/JN.202510_72(5).09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical restraint, commonly used in medical wards to prevent self-extubation and agitation, sometimes fails to achieve one or both of these objectives. Thus, the factors contributing to the occurrence of self-extubation and agitation under restraint require further exploration.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was developed to identify the predictors of two types of adverse events (unplanned device removal and agitation) among hospitalized patients under physical restraint in medical wards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed the medical records of 100 patients aged ≥ 20 years who had been physically restrained in a regional teaching hospital in Taipei between January 2022 and February 2023. Poisson regression was used to examine predictors across the four domains of demographic, emotional, social, and medical factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The significant predictors of extubation during physical restraint identified in the analysis included having a foreign caregiver (B = 0.81, p = .01), emotional instability (B = 1.36, p = .02), a history of extubations during restraint (B = 0.61, p = .02), and a history of agitation episodes before restraint (B = 1.13, p = .04). Predictors of agitation during restraint included use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (B = 1.27, p < .01), medication use during agitation (B = 0.75, p < .01), restraint for treatment purposes (B = 0.63, p = .04), and a history of extubations (B = 0.55, p = .02) or agitation (B = 1.44, p = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on these findings, recommendations for reducing adverse events following physical restraint include prioritizing family caregivers, receiving routine emotional assessments, monitoring medications, and enhancing communication and non-pharmacological strategies prior to restraint.</p>","PeriodicalId":35672,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing","volume":"72 5","pages":"69-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.202510_72(5).09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Physical restraint, commonly used in medical wards to prevent self-extubation and agitation, sometimes fails to achieve one or both of these objectives. Thus, the factors contributing to the occurrence of self-extubation and agitation under restraint require further exploration.
Purpose: This study was developed to identify the predictors of two types of adverse events (unplanned device removal and agitation) among hospitalized patients under physical restraint in medical wards.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the medical records of 100 patients aged ≥ 20 years who had been physically restrained in a regional teaching hospital in Taipei between January 2022 and February 2023. Poisson regression was used to examine predictors across the four domains of demographic, emotional, social, and medical factors.
Results: The significant predictors of extubation during physical restraint identified in the analysis included having a foreign caregiver (B = 0.81, p = .01), emotional instability (B = 1.36, p = .02), a history of extubations during restraint (B = 0.61, p = .02), and a history of agitation episodes before restraint (B = 1.13, p = .04). Predictors of agitation during restraint included use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (B = 1.27, p < .01), medication use during agitation (B = 0.75, p < .01), restraint for treatment purposes (B = 0.63, p = .04), and a history of extubations (B = 0.55, p = .02) or agitation (B = 1.44, p = .02).
Conclusions: Based on these findings, recommendations for reducing adverse events following physical restraint include prioritizing family caregivers, receiving routine emotional assessments, monitoring medications, and enhancing communication and non-pharmacological strategies prior to restraint.