Adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in mouse models of prenatal infections.

Q1 Medicine
Wellcome Open Research Pub Date : 2025-09-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23556.2
Evgeniya V Shmeleva, Delia Hawkes, Cecilia Lusuardi, Yasmin Adewusi, Salvatore Valenti, Francesco Colucci
{"title":"Adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in mouse models of prenatal infections.","authors":"Evgeniya V Shmeleva, Delia Hawkes, Cecilia Lusuardi, Yasmin Adewusi, Salvatore Valenti, Francesco Colucci","doi":"10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23556.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prenatal infections are a leading cause of adverse pregnancy outcomes, yet the mechanisms underlying pathogen-specific effects on maternal and fetal health remain poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Here we conducted a comparative analysis of four mouse models of prenatal infection: <i>Toxoplasma gondii</i> (intraperitoneal), vaccinia virus (intranasal), murine cytomegalovirus (intravenous) and influenza A virus (intranasal).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found markedly different effects on maternal morbidity and mortality, with <i>T. gondii</i> causing severe pregnancy-specific pathology leading to maternal mortality by 8 days post-infection, despite similar pathogen loads in pregnant and non-pregnant mice. Vaccinia virus caused prenatal morbidity, while cytomegalovirus and influenza induced only mild, transient effects. The maternal mortality in <i>T.gondii</i> infection was most likely due to immunopathology, while vaccinia virus caused prenatal morbidity possibly due to tissue infection. None of the pathogens directly infected the fetuses, yet both <i>T. gondii</i> and vaccinia virus significantly impaired both uterine vascular remodelling and fetal growth. Notably, pregnancy was found to be a modifier of local but not systemic immune responses, with reduced inflammatory cytokine production in uterine tissue of infected pregnant mice compared to non-pregnant controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These models provide a systematic platform for understanding pathogen-specific mechanisms of pregnancy complications and identifying therapeutic targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":23677,"journal":{"name":"Wellcome Open Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481148/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellcome Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23556.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prenatal infections are a leading cause of adverse pregnancy outcomes, yet the mechanisms underlying pathogen-specific effects on maternal and fetal health remain poorly understood.

Methods: Here we conducted a comparative analysis of four mouse models of prenatal infection: Toxoplasma gondii (intraperitoneal), vaccinia virus (intranasal), murine cytomegalovirus (intravenous) and influenza A virus (intranasal).

Results: We found markedly different effects on maternal morbidity and mortality, with T. gondii causing severe pregnancy-specific pathology leading to maternal mortality by 8 days post-infection, despite similar pathogen loads in pregnant and non-pregnant mice. Vaccinia virus caused prenatal morbidity, while cytomegalovirus and influenza induced only mild, transient effects. The maternal mortality in T.gondii infection was most likely due to immunopathology, while vaccinia virus caused prenatal morbidity possibly due to tissue infection. None of the pathogens directly infected the fetuses, yet both T. gondii and vaccinia virus significantly impaired both uterine vascular remodelling and fetal growth. Notably, pregnancy was found to be a modifier of local but not systemic immune responses, with reduced inflammatory cytokine production in uterine tissue of infected pregnant mice compared to non-pregnant controls.

Conclusions: These models provide a systematic platform for understanding pathogen-specific mechanisms of pregnancy complications and identifying therapeutic targets.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

产前感染小鼠模型的不良母胎结局。
背景:产前感染是不良妊娠结局的主要原因,然而病原体特异性影响孕产妇和胎儿健康的潜在机制仍然知之甚少。方法:对刚地弓形虫(腹腔)、牛痘病毒(鼻内)、小鼠巨细胞病毒(静脉)和甲型流感病毒(鼻内)四种小鼠产前感染模型进行比较分析。结果:我们发现弓形虫对母体发病率和死亡率的影响明显不同,尽管怀孕和非怀孕小鼠的病原体负荷相似,但弓形虫在感染后8天引起严重的妊娠特异性病理导致母体死亡。牛痘病毒引起产前发病,而巨细胞病毒和流感只引起轻微的、短暂的影响。弓形虫感染引起的产妇死亡主要是免疫病理所致,而牛痘病毒引起的产前发病主要是组织感染所致。没有一种病原体直接感染胎儿,但弓形虫和牛痘病毒都显著损害了子宫血管重构和胎儿生长。值得注意的是,怀孕被发现是局部而非全身免疫反应的调节剂,与未怀孕的对照组相比,感染的怀孕小鼠子宫组织中炎症细胞因子的产生减少。结论:这些模型为了解妊娠并发症的病原特异性机制和确定治疗靶点提供了系统的平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wellcome Open Research
Wellcome Open Research Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: Wellcome Open Research publishes scholarly articles reporting any basic scientific, translational and clinical research that has been funded (or co-funded) by Wellcome. Each publication must have at least one author who has been, or still is, a recipient of a Wellcome grant. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others, is welcome and will be published irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies are all suitable. See the full list of article types here. All articles are published using a fully transparent, author-driven model: the authors are solely responsible for the content of their article. Invited peer review takes place openly after publication, and the authors play a crucial role in ensuring that the article is peer-reviewed by independent experts in a timely manner. Articles that pass peer review will be indexed in PubMed and elsewhere. Wellcome Open Research is an Open Research platform: all articles are published open access; the publishing and peer-review processes are fully transparent; and authors are asked to include detailed descriptions of methods and to provide full and easy access to source data underlying the results to improve reproducibility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信