Prevalence of Coronary Artery Calcification in Non-Contrast Non ECG-Gated Chest CT Scan of Patients With Significant Stenosis in Conventional Angiography in Comparison to Patients Without Significant Stenosis: A Cross-Sectional Study

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Iman Abbaspour, Hoda Asefi, Abbas Soleimani, Golnaz Moradi, Samira Mirzaei
{"title":"Prevalence of Coronary Artery Calcification in Non-Contrast Non ECG-Gated Chest CT Scan of Patients With Significant Stenosis in Conventional Angiography in Comparison to Patients Without Significant Stenosis: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Iman Abbaspour,&nbsp;Hoda Asefi,&nbsp;Abbas Soleimani,&nbsp;Golnaz Moradi,&nbsp;Samira Mirzaei","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.71316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Coronary artery disease is a main cause of mortality in developed and developing countries. Early diagnosis and treatment are important to reduce the burden of the disease. Correlation between coronary artery calcification in non-contrast non-ECG gated chest CT scan and conventional angiographic findings could be a helpful guide for risk assessment and the need for angiographic evaluation in patients with coronary artery calcification in non-contrast chest CT scan applied for other reasons.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the cardiology department of Sina hospital and patients who underwent angiographic study between march 2020 and april 2021 with recent non-contrast non ECG-gated chest CT scan were selected. patients with coronary stent and history of CABG were excluded and angiographic findings, prevalence, diameter and pattern of coronary artery calcification in CT scan was studied in the selected patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The prevalence of calcification in patients with significant stenosis was 94% and was significantly higher than patients without significant stenosis with prevalence of 46% (<i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.001). Calcification length and area in patients with significant stenosis was 67.1 and 218.4 mm<sup>2</sup> and was significantly higher than patients without stenosis with length and area of 15.8 mm and 236.3 mm<sup>2</sup> (<i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.001). there was meaningful correlation between length and area of calcification with maximum stenosis percentage seen in angiographic study (Pearson correlation: 0.61, 0.57).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The presence and extent of CAC on non-contrast, non-ECG-gated chest CT scans are correlated with significant coronary artery stenosis on angiography. These findings suggest that CAC assessment on routine chest CT scans can be used as a criterion for risk stratification and determining the need for angiographic evaluation to rule out significant stenosis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.71316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Coronary artery disease is a main cause of mortality in developed and developing countries. Early diagnosis and treatment are important to reduce the burden of the disease. Correlation between coronary artery calcification in non-contrast non-ECG gated chest CT scan and conventional angiographic findings could be a helpful guide for risk assessment and the need for angiographic evaluation in patients with coronary artery calcification in non-contrast chest CT scan applied for other reasons.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the cardiology department of Sina hospital and patients who underwent angiographic study between march 2020 and april 2021 with recent non-contrast non ECG-gated chest CT scan were selected. patients with coronary stent and history of CABG were excluded and angiographic findings, prevalence, diameter and pattern of coronary artery calcification in CT scan was studied in the selected patients.

Results

The prevalence of calcification in patients with significant stenosis was 94% and was significantly higher than patients without significant stenosis with prevalence of 46% (p-value < 0.001). Calcification length and area in patients with significant stenosis was 67.1 and 218.4 mm2 and was significantly higher than patients without stenosis with length and area of 15.8 mm and 236.3 mm2 (p-value < 0.001). there was meaningful correlation between length and area of calcification with maximum stenosis percentage seen in angiographic study (Pearson correlation: 0.61, 0.57).

Conclusion

The presence and extent of CAC on non-contrast, non-ECG-gated chest CT scans are correlated with significant coronary artery stenosis on angiography. These findings suggest that CAC assessment on routine chest CT scans can be used as a criterion for risk stratification and determining the need for angiographic evaluation to rule out significant stenosis.

Abstract Image

在常规血管造影中有明显狭窄的患者与无明显狭窄的患者的非对比非ecg门控胸部CT扫描中冠状动脉钙化的患病率:一项横断面研究。
背景和目的:冠状动脉疾病是发达国家和发展中国家的主要死亡原因。早期诊断和治疗对于减轻疾病负担非常重要。非造影非ecg门控胸部CT扫描冠状动脉钙化与常规血管造影结果的相关性,可为其他原因应用于胸部CT非造影冠状动脉钙化患者的风险评估和血管造影评估提供有益指导。方法:在新浪医院心内科进行回顾性横断面研究,选择在2020年3月至2021年4月期间接受血管造影检查并近期进行非造影剂非ecg门控胸部CT扫描的患者。排除有冠状动脉支架和冠脉搭桥病史的患者,研究所选患者的CT造影表现、冠状动脉钙化的发生率、直径和形态。结果:明显狭窄患者的钙化率为94%,明显高于无明显狭窄患者的46% (p值2),明显高于无狭窄患者的长度和面积分别为15.8 mm和236.3 mm2 (p值2)。结论:非造影剂、非ecg门控胸部CT扫描CAC的存在和程度与血管造影显示的明显冠状动脉狭窄相关。这些结果表明,常规胸部CT扫描的CAC评估可作为风险分层的标准,并确定是否需要进行血管造影评估以排除明显狭窄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信