Survival Effectiveness of Uniport Anatomic Resections in Patients With Clinical Stage I Lung Cancer: An Observation Cohort Study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Ching Feng Wu, Ming Ju Hsieh, Yueh Fu Fang, Yi Yu Lin, Diego Gonzalez Rivas, Ching Yang Wu
{"title":"Survival Effectiveness of Uniport Anatomic Resections in Patients With Clinical Stage I Lung Cancer: An Observation Cohort Study.","authors":"Ching Feng Wu, Ming Ju Hsieh, Yueh Fu Fang, Yi Yu Lin, Diego Gonzalez Rivas, Ching Yang Wu","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.70169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (uVATS) is increasingly adopted for early-stage lung cancer, long-term survival data comparing different forms of anatomic resection remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term oncologic outcomes-specifically, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)-of patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent uVATS segmentectomy or lobectomy. Secondary outcomes included perioperative parameters and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with clinical stage I NSCLC who underwent uVATS anatomical resection (lobectomy or segmentectomy) between January 2014 and December 2020. The primary endpoints were 5-year DFS and OS, while the secondary endpoints included operative time, drainage duration, hospital stay, conversion rates, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 386 patients with clinical stage I NSCLC underwent uVATS anatomical resection, with 280 receiving lobectomy and 106 undergoing segmentectomy. The 5-year DFS and OS rates did not significantly differ between segmentectomy and lobectomy for patients with pathological stage IA tumors. Segmentectomy was associated with a shorter drainage duration. The overall conversion rate to multiple-port VATS or thoracotomy was 1.8%, with no 30-day surgical mortality observed. Prolonged air leaks were the most common complication.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>uVATS anatomical resection is an effective treatment option for clinical stage I NSCLC, offering comparable long-term survival outcomes for segmentectomy and lobectomy in selected patients. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and optimize patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":"16 19","pages":"e70169"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490315/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70169","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Although uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (uVATS) is increasingly adopted for early-stage lung cancer, long-term survival data comparing different forms of anatomic resection remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term oncologic outcomes-specifically, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)-of patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent uVATS segmentectomy or lobectomy. Secondary outcomes included perioperative parameters and complication rates.

Method: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with clinical stage I NSCLC who underwent uVATS anatomical resection (lobectomy or segmentectomy) between January 2014 and December 2020. The primary endpoints were 5-year DFS and OS, while the secondary endpoints included operative time, drainage duration, hospital stay, conversion rates, and postoperative complications.

Results: A total of 386 patients with clinical stage I NSCLC underwent uVATS anatomical resection, with 280 receiving lobectomy and 106 undergoing segmentectomy. The 5-year DFS and OS rates did not significantly differ between segmentectomy and lobectomy for patients with pathological stage IA tumors. Segmentectomy was associated with a shorter drainage duration. The overall conversion rate to multiple-port VATS or thoracotomy was 1.8%, with no 30-day surgical mortality observed. Prolonged air leaks were the most common complication.

Conclusion: uVATS anatomical resection is an effective treatment option for clinical stage I NSCLC, offering comparable long-term survival outcomes for segmentectomy and lobectomy in selected patients. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and optimize patient selection.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

临床I期肺癌患者单解剖切除的生存效果:一项观察队列研究。
目的:尽管早期肺癌越来越多地采用单门静脉胸腔镜手术(uVATS),但比较不同解剖切除形式的长期生存数据仍然有限。本研究旨在评估临床I期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者接受uVATS节段切除术或肺叶切除术的长期肿瘤预后,特别是5年无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。次要结果包括围手术期参数和并发症发生率。方法:回顾性分析2014年1月至2020年12月期间接受uVATS解剖切除术(肺叶切除术或节段切除术)的临床I期NSCLC患者。主要终点为5年DFS和OS,次要终点包括手术时间、引流时间、住院时间、转换率和术后并发症。结果:386例临床I期NSCLC患者行uVATS解剖切除术,其中280例行肺叶切除术,106例行节段切除术。病理期IA患者的5年DFS和OS率在节段切除术和肺叶切除术之间无显著差异。节段切除术与较短的引流时间相关。多端口VATS或开胸术的总转换率为1.8%,未观察到30天手术死亡率。长时间的漏气是最常见的并发症。结论:uVATS解剖切除术是临床I期NSCLC的有效治疗选择,在选定的患者中,与节段切除术和肺叶切除术相比,uVATS解剖切除术提供了相当的长期生存结果。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来证实这些发现并优化患者选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thoracic Cancer
Thoracic Cancer ONCOLOGY-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
439
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society. The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信