Determinants of antenatal care dropout among pregnant women in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Eneyew Talie Fenta, Destaw Endeshaw, Ousman Adal, Abiyu Abadi Tareke, Natnael Kebede, Amare Mebrat Delie, Eyob Ketema Bogale, Tadele Fentabel Anagaw, Misganaw Guadie Tiruneh
{"title":"Determinants of antenatal care dropout among pregnant women in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Eneyew Talie Fenta, Destaw Endeshaw, Ousman Adal, Abiyu Abadi Tareke, Natnael Kebede, Amare Mebrat Delie, Eyob Ketema Bogale, Tadele Fentabel Anagaw, Misganaw Guadie Tiruneh","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02906-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antenatal care (ANC) is a comprehensive healthcare service designed to support pregnant women through education, monitoring, and interventions to promote a healthy pregnancy and ensure a positive childbirth. Regular ANC visits play a crucial role in preventing complications, managing existing health conditions, and promoting the overall well-being of both the mother and the unborn child. Dropout from ANC visits results in potential complications during pregnancy, and these complications can involve the mother's health, the fetus's health, or both. Common complications of pregnancy include high blood pressure, gestational diabetes, anemia, preeclampsia, preterm labor, stillbirth, and miscarriage. The objective of this study is to estimate the prevalence of dropout from antenatal care and determinant factors among pregnant women in Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis included with open or free access to full text all full, English-language original research articles, and doctoral dissertations on observational studies (cross-sectional, case control, or cohort) conducted worldwide between 2000 and December 15, 2023, which were published in peer-reviewed journals that report dropout rates from prenatal care and its determinants. We follow PRISMA checklist. Using keywords, papers were retrieved from the electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and gray literature. Stata 17 was used to conduct the meta-analysis. The Egger's regression, Begg's test, and funnel plot were employed to investigate publication bias. To ascertain the level of heterogeneity, the I<sup>2</sup> statistics were employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall magnitude of antenatal care dropout among pregnant women, as pooled from the 16 studies, was found to be 29.44%, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 19.16% to 39.72%. The pooled odds ratio showed that rural pregnant women (AOR = 3.55, 95 CI (1.17-5.92). women who had no formal education (AOR = 3.88, 95 CI (- 0.24-8.00), inaccessible PHC facilities (AOR = 5.90, 95 CI (0.54-11.26), lack of support from family or husband (AOR = 4.91 CI (- 1.31-11.19), and women with poor economic status (AOR = 2.50, 95 CI (1.19-3.81) were determinant factors for maternal dropout from antenatal care service.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that the prevalence of antenatal care dropout was high based on the included 16 articles. According to the review, pregnant women's antenatal care dropout was significantly correlated with living in a rural area, being unable to access a primary health facility, lacking formal education, not having support from her husband or family, and having low socioeconomic status. These findings suggest that various socio-economic and geographical factors play a significant role in determining whether pregnant women continue with antenatal care services. Addressing these determinants, such as improving access to healthcare facilities, providing educational support, and enhancing economic conditions, may contribute to reducing the dropout rates and improving overall maternal healthcare outcomes. Additionally, understanding these factors is essential for tailoring interventions to specific populations and regions to ensure effective ANC retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"186"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02906-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antenatal care (ANC) is a comprehensive healthcare service designed to support pregnant women through education, monitoring, and interventions to promote a healthy pregnancy and ensure a positive childbirth. Regular ANC visits play a crucial role in preventing complications, managing existing health conditions, and promoting the overall well-being of both the mother and the unborn child. Dropout from ANC visits results in potential complications during pregnancy, and these complications can involve the mother's health, the fetus's health, or both. Common complications of pregnancy include high blood pressure, gestational diabetes, anemia, preeclampsia, preterm labor, stillbirth, and miscarriage. The objective of this study is to estimate the prevalence of dropout from antenatal care and determinant factors among pregnant women in Africa.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis included with open or free access to full text all full, English-language original research articles, and doctoral dissertations on observational studies (cross-sectional, case control, or cohort) conducted worldwide between 2000 and December 15, 2023, which were published in peer-reviewed journals that report dropout rates from prenatal care and its determinants. We follow PRISMA checklist. Using keywords, papers were retrieved from the electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and gray literature. Stata 17 was used to conduct the meta-analysis. The Egger's regression, Begg's test, and funnel plot were employed to investigate publication bias. To ascertain the level of heterogeneity, the I2 statistics were employed.

Results: The overall magnitude of antenatal care dropout among pregnant women, as pooled from the 16 studies, was found to be 29.44%, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 19.16% to 39.72%. The pooled odds ratio showed that rural pregnant women (AOR = 3.55, 95 CI (1.17-5.92). women who had no formal education (AOR = 3.88, 95 CI (- 0.24-8.00), inaccessible PHC facilities (AOR = 5.90, 95 CI (0.54-11.26), lack of support from family or husband (AOR = 4.91 CI (- 1.31-11.19), and women with poor economic status (AOR = 2.50, 95 CI (1.19-3.81) were determinant factors for maternal dropout from antenatal care service.

Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that the prevalence of antenatal care dropout was high based on the included 16 articles. According to the review, pregnant women's antenatal care dropout was significantly correlated with living in a rural area, being unable to access a primary health facility, lacking formal education, not having support from her husband or family, and having low socioeconomic status. These findings suggest that various socio-economic and geographical factors play a significant role in determining whether pregnant women continue with antenatal care services. Addressing these determinants, such as improving access to healthcare facilities, providing educational support, and enhancing economic conditions, may contribute to reducing the dropout rates and improving overall maternal healthcare outcomes. Additionally, understanding these factors is essential for tailoring interventions to specific populations and regions to ensure effective ANC retention.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

非洲孕妇产前护理辍学的决定因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:产前保健(ANC)是一项综合性的保健服务,旨在通过教育、监测和干预措施支持孕妇,促进健康妊娠和确保积极分娩。定期产前检查在预防并发症、管理现有健康状况和促进母亲和未出生婴儿的整体福祉方面发挥着至关重要的作用。不去产前检查会导致怀孕期间潜在的并发症,这些并发症可能涉及母亲的健康、胎儿的健康,或两者兼而有之。常见的妊娠并发症包括高血压、妊娠糖尿病、贫血、先兆子痫、早产、死胎和流产。本研究的目的是估计非洲孕妇中产前护理辍学的流行程度和决定因素。方法:本系统综述和荟萃分析纳入了2000年至2023年12月15日期间在全球范围内进行的观察性研究(横断面、病例对照或队列)的所有完整、英语原创研究文章和博士论文的开放或免费全文,这些研究发表在同行评审期刊上,报告了产前护理的辍学率及其决定因素。我们遵循PRISMA检查表。使用关键词从PubMed、Cochrane Library、谷歌Scholar和灰色文献等电子数据库中检索论文。采用Stata 17进行meta分析。采用Egger’s回归、Begg’s检验和漏斗图分析发表偏倚。为了确定异质性水平,采用I2统计量。结果:从16项研究中汇总,孕妇产前护理放弃的总体幅度为29.44%,95%置信区间(CI)为19.16%至39.72%。合并优势比显示农村孕妇(AOR = 3.55, 95 CI(1.17-5.92))。未接受过正规教育的妇女(AOR = 3.88, 95 CI(- 0.24-8.00)、难以获得初级保健设施(AOR = 5.90, 95 CI(0.54-11.26))、缺乏家庭或丈夫的支持(AOR = 4.91 CI(- 1.31-11.19)、经济状况较差的妇女(AOR = 2.50, 95 CI(1.19-3.81))是产妇退出产前保健服务的决定因素。结论:本系统综述和荟萃分析显示,根据纳入的16篇文章,产前护理辍学率很高。根据审查,孕妇的产前护理辍学与生活在农村地区、无法获得初级保健设施、缺乏正规教育、没有丈夫或家庭的支持以及社会经济地位低显著相关。这些发现表明,各种社会经济和地理因素在决定孕妇是否继续接受产前保健服务方面发挥着重要作用。解决这些决定因素,如改善获得保健设施的机会、提供教育支助和改善经济条件,可能有助于降低辍学率和改善孕产妇保健的总体成果。此外,了解这些因素对于为特定人群和地区量身定制干预措施以确保有效保留ANC至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信