Air matters: the role of postoperative intracranial pneumocephalus in recurrence of chronic subdural hematomas evaluated through a multivariate analysis of 460 patients comparing closed drainage versus standard irrigation.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Maria Rosaria Scala, Ciro Mastantuoni, Valentina Cioffi, Salvatore Di Colandrea, Giuseppe Corazzelli, Anna Tucci, Sergio Carotenuto, Giuseppe Di Costanzo, Enrico Cavaglià, Raffaele de Falco, Antonio Bocchetti
{"title":"Air matters: the role of postoperative intracranial pneumocephalus in recurrence of chronic subdural hematomas evaluated through a multivariate analysis of 460 patients comparing closed drainage versus standard irrigation.","authors":"Maria Rosaria Scala, Ciro Mastantuoni, Valentina Cioffi, Salvatore Di Colandrea, Giuseppe Corazzelli, Anna Tucci, Sergio Carotenuto, Giuseppe Di Costanzo, Enrico Cavaglià, Raffaele de Falco, Antonio Bocchetti","doi":"10.3171/2025.7.FOCUS25521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common neurosurgical pathology, especially among older patients, with increasing incidence due to aging populations and widespread antithrombotic use. Despite the relatively straightforward nature of its surgical treatment, recurrence remains a major concern, with rates up to 30% reported. Among the factors implicated in recurrence, postoperative pneumocephalus has emerged as a significant and potentially modifiable risk factor. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of a burr hole craniostomy with a closed drainage system (CDS) versus the traditional burr hole with standard irrigation (SI), with a focus on recurrence, pneumocephalus, and patient recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center cohort study included 460 patients undergoing surgical evacuation of symptomatic CSDH between 2010 and 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on surgical technique: CDS (n = 358) and SI (n = 102). Demographics, clinical status, radiological features, and surgical outcomes were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were utilized to assess predictors of 30-day recurrence. Volumetric analysis of hematomas and pneumocephalus was performed using standardized imaging protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Postoperative pneumocephalus was significantly reduced in the CDS group (3.0 ± 1.78 cm3) compared with SI (49.3 ± 11.97 cm3) (p < 0.0001). Recurrence rates were markedly lower in the CDS group (10.1% vs 27.5%, p < 0.001), with CDS also associated with a mean shorter hospital stay (6.8 vs 11.2 days, p < 0.001), faster hematoma reabsorption (2.1 vs 3.2 months, p < 0.001), and lower 30-day mortality (1.1% vs 4.9%, p = 0.042). Multivariate analysis identified postoperative pneumocephalus volume (OR 1.0293 per cm3, p < 0.001) and residual hematoma (OR 1.00 per cm3, p = 0.046) as the only independent predictors of recurrence, while undergoing SI as opposed to the CDS was associated with a significantly increased risk of recurrence (OR 6.63, 95% CI 1.08-40.74; p = 0.041). No significant association was found between recurrence and antithrombotic therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CDS technique offers a cost-effective, safe, and efficient approach for the treatment of CSDH. By limiting air entry and promoting controlled drainage, it significantly reduces recurrence and improves patient outcomes. Given its simplicity and low resource requirements, the CDS method should be considered as a preferred first-line surgical strategy, particularly in the context of value-based care for an aging population.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"59 4","pages":"E4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.7.FOCUS25521","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common neurosurgical pathology, especially among older patients, with increasing incidence due to aging populations and widespread antithrombotic use. Despite the relatively straightforward nature of its surgical treatment, recurrence remains a major concern, with rates up to 30% reported. Among the factors implicated in recurrence, postoperative pneumocephalus has emerged as a significant and potentially modifiable risk factor. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of a burr hole craniostomy with a closed drainage system (CDS) versus the traditional burr hole with standard irrigation (SI), with a focus on recurrence, pneumocephalus, and patient recovery.

Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included 460 patients undergoing surgical evacuation of symptomatic CSDH between 2010 and 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on surgical technique: CDS (n = 358) and SI (n = 102). Demographics, clinical status, radiological features, and surgical outcomes were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were utilized to assess predictors of 30-day recurrence. Volumetric analysis of hematomas and pneumocephalus was performed using standardized imaging protocols.

Results: Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Postoperative pneumocephalus was significantly reduced in the CDS group (3.0 ± 1.78 cm3) compared with SI (49.3 ± 11.97 cm3) (p < 0.0001). Recurrence rates were markedly lower in the CDS group (10.1% vs 27.5%, p < 0.001), with CDS also associated with a mean shorter hospital stay (6.8 vs 11.2 days, p < 0.001), faster hematoma reabsorption (2.1 vs 3.2 months, p < 0.001), and lower 30-day mortality (1.1% vs 4.9%, p = 0.042). Multivariate analysis identified postoperative pneumocephalus volume (OR 1.0293 per cm3, p < 0.001) and residual hematoma (OR 1.00 per cm3, p = 0.046) as the only independent predictors of recurrence, while undergoing SI as opposed to the CDS was associated with a significantly increased risk of recurrence (OR 6.63, 95% CI 1.08-40.74; p = 0.041). No significant association was found between recurrence and antithrombotic therapy.

Conclusions: The CDS technique offers a cost-effective, safe, and efficient approach for the treatment of CSDH. By limiting air entry and promoting controlled drainage, it significantly reduces recurrence and improves patient outcomes. Given its simplicity and low resource requirements, the CDS method should be considered as a preferred first-line surgical strategy, particularly in the context of value-based care for an aging population.

空气问题:通过460例患者的多因素分析,比较封闭引流和标准灌洗,评估术后颅内气颅在慢性硬膜下血肿复发中的作用。
目的:慢性硬膜下血肿(CSDH)是一种常见的神经外科病理,特别是在老年患者中,由于人口老龄化和广泛使用抗血栓药物,其发病率不断增加。尽管手术治疗相对简单,但复发率仍是主要问题,据报道复发率高达30%。在与复发有关的因素中,术后尘脑已成为一个重要的、潜在的可改变的危险因素。本研究旨在比较封闭引流系统(CDS)与传统钻孔标准灌洗(SI)的有效性和安全性,重点研究复发、脑气和患者恢复情况。方法:这项回顾性、单中心队列研究包括460例2010年至2024年间接受手术清除症状性CSDH的患者。根据手术技术将患者分为两组:CDS (n = 358)和SI (n = 102)。分析了人口统计学、临床状况、放射学特征和手术结果。采用单因素和多因素logistic回归分析评估30天复发的预测因素。采用标准化成像方案对血肿和气肿进行体积分析。结果:基线特征平衡良好。与SI组(49.3±11.97 cm3)相比,CDS组术后气头明显减少(3.0±1.78 cm3) (p < 0.0001)。CDS组的复发率明显较低(10.1% vs 27.5%, p < 0.001),而且CDS还与平均住院时间较短(6.8 vs 11.2天,p < 0.001)、血肿重吸收较快(2.1 vs 3.2个月,p < 0.001)和30天死亡率较低(1.1% vs 4.9%, p = 0.042)相关。多因素分析发现,术后脑积水体积(OR 1.0293 / cm3, p < 0.001)和残留血肿(OR 1.00 / cm3, p = 0.046)是复发的唯一独立预测因素,而与CDS相比,接受SI与复发风险显著增加相关(OR 6.63, 95% CI 1.08-40.74; p = 0.041)。未发现复发与抗栓治疗有显著相关性。结论:CDS技术是一种经济、安全、有效的治疗CSDH的方法。通过限制空气进入和促进控制引流,可显著减少复发并改善患者预后。鉴于其简单性和低资源需求,CDS方法应被视为首选的一线手术策略,特别是在基于价值的老龄化人口护理背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical focus
Neurosurgical focus CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信