Boya Guo, Yanwei Cai, Daeeun Kim, Roelof A J Smit, Zhe Wang, Kruthika R Iyer, Austin T Hilliard, Jeffrey Haessler, Ran Tao, K Alaine Broadaway, Yujie Wang, Nikita Pozdeyev, Frederik F Stæger, Chaojie Yang, Brett Vanderwerff, Amit D Patki, Lauren Stalbow, Meng Lin, Nicholas Rafaels, Jonathan Shortt, Laura Wiley, Maggie Stanislawski, Jack Pattee, Lea Davis, Peter S Straub, Megan M Shuey, Nancy J Cox, Nanette R Lee, Marit E Jørgensen, Peter Bjerregaard, Christina Larsen, Torben Hansen, Ida Moltke, James B Meigs, Daniel O Stram, Xianyong Yin, Xiang Zhou, Kyong-Mi Chang, Shoa L Clarke, Rodrigo Guarischi-Sousa, Joanna Lankester, Philip S Tsao, Steven Buyske, Mariaelisa Graff, Laura M Raffield, Quan Sun, Lynne R Wilkens, Christopher S Carlson, Charles B Easton, Simin Liu, JoAnn E Manson, Loïc L Marchand, Christopher A Haiman, Karen L Mohlke, Penny Gordon-Larsen, Anders Albrechtsen, Michael Boehnke, Stephen S Rich, Ani Manichaikul, Jerome I Rotter, Noha A Yousri, Ryan M Irvin, Chris Gignoux, Kari E North, Ruth J F Loos, Themistocles L Assimes, Ulrike Peters, Charles Kooperberg, Sridharan Raghavan, Heather M Highland, Burcu F Darst
{"title":"Polygenic risk score for type 2 diabetes shows context-dependent effects across populations.","authors":"Boya Guo, Yanwei Cai, Daeeun Kim, Roelof A J Smit, Zhe Wang, Kruthika R Iyer, Austin T Hilliard, Jeffrey Haessler, Ran Tao, K Alaine Broadaway, Yujie Wang, Nikita Pozdeyev, Frederik F Stæger, Chaojie Yang, Brett Vanderwerff, Amit D Patki, Lauren Stalbow, Meng Lin, Nicholas Rafaels, Jonathan Shortt, Laura Wiley, Maggie Stanislawski, Jack Pattee, Lea Davis, Peter S Straub, Megan M Shuey, Nancy J Cox, Nanette R Lee, Marit E Jørgensen, Peter Bjerregaard, Christina Larsen, Torben Hansen, Ida Moltke, James B Meigs, Daniel O Stram, Xianyong Yin, Xiang Zhou, Kyong-Mi Chang, Shoa L Clarke, Rodrigo Guarischi-Sousa, Joanna Lankester, Philip S Tsao, Steven Buyske, Mariaelisa Graff, Laura M Raffield, Quan Sun, Lynne R Wilkens, Christopher S Carlson, Charles B Easton, Simin Liu, JoAnn E Manson, Loïc L Marchand, Christopher A Haiman, Karen L Mohlke, Penny Gordon-Larsen, Anders Albrechtsen, Michael Boehnke, Stephen S Rich, Ani Manichaikul, Jerome I Rotter, Noha A Yousri, Ryan M Irvin, Chris Gignoux, Kari E North, Ruth J F Loos, Themistocles L Assimes, Ulrike Peters, Charles Kooperberg, Sridharan Raghavan, Heather M Highland, Burcu F Darst","doi":"10.1038/s41467-025-63546-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Polygenic risk scores hold prognostic value for identifying individuals at higher risk of type 2 diabetes. However, further characterization is needed to understand the generalizability of type 2 diabetes polygenic risk scores in diverse populations across various contexts. We systematically characterize a multi-ancestry type 2 diabetes polygenic risk score among 244,637 cases and 637,891 controls across diverse populations from the Population Architecture Genomics and Epidemiology Study and 13 additional biobanks and cohorts. Polygenic risk score performance is context dependent, with better performance in those who are younger, male, without hypertension, and not obese or overweight. Additionally, the polygenic risk score is associated with various diabetes-related cardiometabolic traits and type 2 diabetes complications, suggesting its utility for stratifying risk of complications and identifying shared genetic architecture between type 2 diabetes and other diseases. These findings highlight the need to account for context when evaluating polygenic risk score as a tool for type 2 diabetes risk prognostication and the potentially generalizable associations of type 2 diabetes polygenic risk score with diabetes-related traits, despite differential performance in type 2 diabetes prediction across diverse populations. Our study provides a comprehensive resource to characterize a type 2 diabetes polygenic risk score.</p>","PeriodicalId":19066,"journal":{"name":"Nature Communications","volume":"16 1","pages":"8632"},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Communications","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-63546-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores hold prognostic value for identifying individuals at higher risk of type 2 diabetes. However, further characterization is needed to understand the generalizability of type 2 diabetes polygenic risk scores in diverse populations across various contexts. We systematically characterize a multi-ancestry type 2 diabetes polygenic risk score among 244,637 cases and 637,891 controls across diverse populations from the Population Architecture Genomics and Epidemiology Study and 13 additional biobanks and cohorts. Polygenic risk score performance is context dependent, with better performance in those who are younger, male, without hypertension, and not obese or overweight. Additionally, the polygenic risk score is associated with various diabetes-related cardiometabolic traits and type 2 diabetes complications, suggesting its utility for stratifying risk of complications and identifying shared genetic architecture between type 2 diabetes and other diseases. These findings highlight the need to account for context when evaluating polygenic risk score as a tool for type 2 diabetes risk prognostication and the potentially generalizable associations of type 2 diabetes polygenic risk score with diabetes-related traits, despite differential performance in type 2 diabetes prediction across diverse populations. Our study provides a comprehensive resource to characterize a type 2 diabetes polygenic risk score.
期刊介绍:
Nature Communications, an open-access journal, publishes high-quality research spanning all areas of the natural sciences. Papers featured in the journal showcase significant advances relevant to specialists in each respective field. With a 2-year impact factor of 16.6 (2022) and a median time of 8 days from submission to the first editorial decision, Nature Communications is committed to rapid dissemination of research findings. As a multidisciplinary journal, it welcomes contributions from biological, health, physical, chemical, Earth, social, mathematical, applied, and engineering sciences, aiming to highlight important breakthroughs within each domain.