EEG microstates, spectral analysis, and risk prediction in epilepsy comorbid with mild cognitive impairment: alteration in intrinsic brain activity.

IF 7.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Shenzhi Fang, Shenggen Chen, Lizhen Chen, Hanbin Lin, Changyun Liu, Chunhui Che, Wenting Xiong, Yuying Zhang, Juan Li, Luyan Wu, Xinming Huang, Huapin Huang, Wanhui Lin, Chaofeng Zhu
{"title":"EEG microstates, spectral analysis, and risk prediction in epilepsy comorbid with mild cognitive impairment: alteration in intrinsic brain activity.","authors":"Shenzhi Fang, Shenggen Chen, Lizhen Chen, Hanbin Lin, Changyun Liu, Chunhui Che, Wenting Xiong, Yuying Zhang, Juan Li, Luyan Wu, Xinming Huang, Huapin Huang, Wanhui Lin, Chaofeng Zhu","doi":"10.1186/s12967-025-07023-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate the differences in electroencephalogram (EEG) microstates and power spectrum between patients with epilepsy (PWE) comorbid with (without) mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and to develop a machine learning model to predict the risk of MCI comorbidity in PWE.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were classified into PWE comorbid with MCI (EPMCI) and PWE comorbid without MCI (EPNMCI). The microstate parameters and power spectral density (PSD) of both groups were compared. We combined different types of variables and constructed models using Support Vector Machine (SVM), Neural Network (NNET), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Naive Bayes (NB). An ideal predictive model was selected to evaluate the risk of MCI comorbidity in PWE.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 627 PWE were included in this study, of whom 106 had MCI and 521 did not. Significant differences were observed between the two groups of patients in microstates A, B, C, D, and PSD. Among various machine learning models and multiple variable groups, we selected the NNET model based on microstate variables as the optimal model. It demonstrated the second-highest ROCAUC value (0.93), the highest accuracy (0.89), the lowest standard error (0.11), and superior calibration metrics, including the highest discrimination index (D = 0.724), the lowest Brier score (0.084), and the smallest unreliability index (U = 0.006). Finally, we compared this model with the traditional MMSE decision curve analysis (DCA) and found that it exhibited a wider range of applicable thresholds and a greater overall net benefit, demonstrating enhanced clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Differences in EEG microstates analysis and spectral analysis provide evidence for the mechanisms and dynamic changes associated with epilepsy comorbid with MCI. The development of a predictive model offers guidance for the assessment of MCI in specific populations with epilepsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17458,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Translational Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"1035"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-025-07023-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate the differences in electroencephalogram (EEG) microstates and power spectrum between patients with epilepsy (PWE) comorbid with (without) mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and to develop a machine learning model to predict the risk of MCI comorbidity in PWE.

Method: Participants were classified into PWE comorbid with MCI (EPMCI) and PWE comorbid without MCI (EPNMCI). The microstate parameters and power spectral density (PSD) of both groups were compared. We combined different types of variables and constructed models using Support Vector Machine (SVM), Neural Network (NNET), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Naive Bayes (NB). An ideal predictive model was selected to evaluate the risk of MCI comorbidity in PWE.

Result: A total of 627 PWE were included in this study, of whom 106 had MCI and 521 did not. Significant differences were observed between the two groups of patients in microstates A, B, C, D, and PSD. Among various machine learning models and multiple variable groups, we selected the NNET model based on microstate variables as the optimal model. It demonstrated the second-highest ROCAUC value (0.93), the highest accuracy (0.89), the lowest standard error (0.11), and superior calibration metrics, including the highest discrimination index (D = 0.724), the lowest Brier score (0.084), and the smallest unreliability index (U = 0.006). Finally, we compared this model with the traditional MMSE decision curve analysis (DCA) and found that it exhibited a wider range of applicable thresholds and a greater overall net benefit, demonstrating enhanced clinical utility.

Conclusion: Differences in EEG microstates analysis and spectral analysis provide evidence for the mechanisms and dynamic changes associated with epilepsy comorbid with MCI. The development of a predictive model offers guidance for the assessment of MCI in specific populations with epilepsy.

脑电图微观状态、频谱分析和癫痫合并轻度认知障碍的风险预测:内在脑活动的改变。
目的:探讨癫痫(PWE)合并轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者脑电图(EEG)微态和功率谱的差异,并建立预测PWE合并轻度认知障碍风险的机器学习模型。方法:将参与者分为PWE合并MCI (EPMCI)和PWE合并无MCI (EPNMCI)两组。比较两组的微状态参数和功率谱密度(PSD)。我们结合不同类型的变量,并使用支持向量机(SVM)、神经网络(NNET)、随机森林(RF)、k近邻(KNN)和朴素贝叶斯(NB)构建模型。选择一个理想的预测模型来评估PWE患者MCI合并症的风险。结果:本研究共纳入627例PWE,其中106例有MCI, 521例无MCI。两组患者在微观状态A、B、C、D和PSD之间存在显著差异。在各种机器学习模型和多变量组中,我们选择了基于微状态变量的NNET模型作为最优模型。该方法的ROCAUC值(0.93)次高,准确度(0.89)最高,标准误差(0.11)最低,且具有最高的鉴别指数(D = 0.724)、最低的Brier评分(0.084)和最低的不信度指数(U = 0.006)。最后,我们将该模型与传统的MMSE决策曲线分析(DCA)进行了比较,发现它具有更广泛的适用阈值范围和更大的总体净效益,显示出更高的临床实用性。结论:脑电图微态分析和频谱分析的差异为癫痫合并轻度认知损伤的发病机制和动态变化提供了依据。预测模型的开发为评估特定癫痫人群的轻度认知障碍提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Translational Medicine
Journal of Translational Medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
537
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Translational Medicine is an open-access journal that publishes articles focusing on information derived from human experimentation to enhance communication between basic and clinical science. It covers all areas of translational medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信