{"title":"Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota from Long-term Captive and Newly Captured Whale Sharks (Rhincodon typus).","authors":"Takaomi Ito, Takao Segawa, Kazuto Takasaki, Takahiro Matsudaira, Itsuki Kiyatake, Hiroyuki Irino, Yu Nakajima","doi":"10.1264/jsme2.ME25023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite its ecological importance, the gut microbiota of whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) remains poorly understood. Therefore, the present study exami-ned how environmental differences affect the fecal microbiota by comparing long-term captive and newly captured individuals. Fecal samples were collected over time from four long-term captive and two newly captured whale sharks, with seawater also being sampled from their respective tanks. Using 16S rRNA sequencing, 12,497 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were identified, including 6,976 classified as major ASVs. There were no significant differences in alpha diversity indexes between long-term captive and newly captured sharks; however, the latter showed slightly larger variance in four indexes. The ASV count per individual was slightly lower in long-term captive sharks than in their newly captured counterparts. In long-term captive individuals, Photobacterium was highly abundant. Conversely, Ureaplasma was dominant in newly captured individuals, but was barely detected in long-term captive sharks. Although alpha diversity did not differ significantly between the groups, a beta diversity ana-lysis showed clear distinctions. The high abundance of Ureaplasma in newly captured sharks suggests its involvement in nitrogen metabolism, possibly through urea recycling. Although further research is needed to clarify the taxonomic position and ecological functions of these Ureaplasma populations, the present study provides key insights for the conservation of wild whale sharks and improving health management for captive individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":18482,"journal":{"name":"Microbes and Environments","volume":"40 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbes and Environments","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME25023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite its ecological importance, the gut microbiota of whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) remains poorly understood. Therefore, the present study exami-ned how environmental differences affect the fecal microbiota by comparing long-term captive and newly captured individuals. Fecal samples were collected over time from four long-term captive and two newly captured whale sharks, with seawater also being sampled from their respective tanks. Using 16S rRNA sequencing, 12,497 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were identified, including 6,976 classified as major ASVs. There were no significant differences in alpha diversity indexes between long-term captive and newly captured sharks; however, the latter showed slightly larger variance in four indexes. The ASV count per individual was slightly lower in long-term captive sharks than in their newly captured counterparts. In long-term captive individuals, Photobacterium was highly abundant. Conversely, Ureaplasma was dominant in newly captured individuals, but was barely detected in long-term captive sharks. Although alpha diversity did not differ significantly between the groups, a beta diversity ana-lysis showed clear distinctions. The high abundance of Ureaplasma in newly captured sharks suggests its involvement in nitrogen metabolism, possibly through urea recycling. Although further research is needed to clarify the taxonomic position and ecological functions of these Ureaplasma populations, the present study provides key insights for the conservation of wild whale sharks and improving health management for captive individuals.
期刊介绍:
Microbial ecology in natural and engineered environments; Microbial degradation of xenobiotic compounds; Microbial processes in biogeochemical cycles; Microbial interactions and signaling with animals and plants; Interactions among microorganisms; Microorganisms related to public health; Phylogenetic and functional diversity of microbial communities; Genomics, metagenomics, and bioinformatics for microbiology; Application of microorganisms to agriculture, fishery, and industry; Molecular biology and biochemistry related to environmental microbiology; Methodology in general and environmental microbiology; Interdisciplinary research areas for microbial ecology (e.g., Astrobiology, and Origins of Life); Taxonomic description of novel microorganisms with ecological perspective; Physiology and metabolisms of microorganisms; Evolution of genes and microorganisms; Genome report of microorganisms with ecological perspective.