Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota from Long-term Captive and Newly Captured Whale Sharks (Rhincodon typus).

IF 2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Takaomi Ito, Takao Segawa, Kazuto Takasaki, Takahiro Matsudaira, Itsuki Kiyatake, Hiroyuki Irino, Yu Nakajima
{"title":"Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota from Long-term Captive and Newly Captured Whale Sharks (Rhincodon typus).","authors":"Takaomi Ito, Takao Segawa, Kazuto Takasaki, Takahiro Matsudaira, Itsuki Kiyatake, Hiroyuki Irino, Yu Nakajima","doi":"10.1264/jsme2.ME25023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite its ecological importance, the gut microbiota of whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) remains poorly understood. Therefore, the present study exami-ned how environmental differences affect the fecal microbiota by comparing long-term captive and newly captured individuals. Fecal samples were collected over time from four long-term captive and two newly captured whale sharks, with seawater also being sampled from their respective tanks. Using 16S rRNA sequencing, 12,497 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were identified, including 6,976 classified as major ASVs. There were no significant differences in alpha diversity indexes between long-term captive and newly captured sharks; however, the latter showed slightly larger variance in four indexes. The ASV count per individual was slightly lower in long-term captive sharks than in their newly captured counterparts. In long-term captive individuals, Photobacterium was highly abundant. Conversely, Ureaplasma was dominant in newly captured individuals, but was barely detected in long-term captive sharks. Although alpha diversity did not differ significantly between the groups, a beta diversity ana-lysis showed clear distinctions. The high abundance of Ureaplasma in newly captured sharks suggests its involvement in nitrogen metabolism, possibly through urea recycling. Although further research is needed to clarify the taxonomic position and ecological functions of these Ureaplasma populations, the present study provides key insights for the conservation of wild whale sharks and improving health management for captive individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":18482,"journal":{"name":"Microbes and Environments","volume":"40 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbes and Environments","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME25023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite its ecological importance, the gut microbiota of whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) remains poorly understood. Therefore, the present study exami-ned how environmental differences affect the fecal microbiota by comparing long-term captive and newly captured individuals. Fecal samples were collected over time from four long-term captive and two newly captured whale sharks, with seawater also being sampled from their respective tanks. Using 16S rRNA sequencing, 12,497 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were identified, including 6,976 classified as major ASVs. There were no significant differences in alpha diversity indexes between long-term captive and newly captured sharks; however, the latter showed slightly larger variance in four indexes. The ASV count per individual was slightly lower in long-term captive sharks than in their newly captured counterparts. In long-term captive individuals, Photobacterium was highly abundant. Conversely, Ureaplasma was dominant in newly captured individuals, but was barely detected in long-term captive sharks. Although alpha diversity did not differ significantly between the groups, a beta diversity ana-lysis showed clear distinctions. The high abundance of Ureaplasma in newly captured sharks suggests its involvement in nitrogen metabolism, possibly through urea recycling. Although further research is needed to clarify the taxonomic position and ecological functions of these Ureaplasma populations, the present study provides key insights for the conservation of wild whale sharks and improving health management for captive individuals.

长期圈养和新捕获鲸鲨粪便微生物群的比较。
尽管其生态重要性,鲸鲨(Rhincodon typus)的肠道微生物群仍然知之甚少。因此,本研究通过比较长期圈养和新捕获的个体,考察了环境差异对粪便微生物群的影响。研究人员从四只长期圈养的鲸鲨和两只新捕获的鲸鲨身上收集了粪便样本,并从它们各自的水箱中采集了海水样本。16S rRNA测序共鉴定出12497个扩增子序列变异(amplicon sequence variants, asv),其中6976个为主要asv。α多样性指数在长期圈养与新捕获鲨鱼间无显著差异;而后者在四项指标上的差异略大。长期圈养的鲨鱼的人均ASV数量略低于新捕获的鲨鱼。在长期圈养的个体中,光杆菌含量非常丰富。相反,脲原体在新捕获的个体中占主导地位,但在长期捕获的鲨鱼中几乎没有检测到。虽然α多样性在组间没有显著差异,但β多样性分析显示出明显的差异。新捕获的鲨鱼体内尿素原体的高丰度表明,它参与了氮代谢,可能是通过尿素循环。虽然这些脲原体种群的分类地位和生态功能还需要进一步的研究,但本研究为野生鲸鲨的保护和改善圈养个体的健康管理提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbes and Environments
Microbes and Environments 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
66
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Microbial ecology in natural and engineered environments; Microbial degradation of xenobiotic compounds; Microbial processes in biogeochemical cycles; Microbial interactions and signaling with animals and plants; Interactions among microorganisms; Microorganisms related to public health; Phylogenetic and functional diversity of microbial communities; Genomics, metagenomics, and bioinformatics for microbiology; Application of microorganisms to agriculture, fishery, and industry; Molecular biology and biochemistry related to environmental microbiology; Methodology in general and environmental microbiology; Interdisciplinary research areas for microbial ecology (e.g., Astrobiology, and Origins of Life); Taxonomic description of novel microorganisms with ecological perspective; Physiology and metabolisms of microorganisms; Evolution of genes and microorganisms; Genome report of microorganisms with ecological perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信