Technology-Facilitated Abuse in Relationships Scale: Psychometric Properties of Victimization and Perpetration Among Portuguese Adolescents.

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Maria Vale, Marlene Matos
{"title":"Technology-Facilitated Abuse in Relationships Scale: Psychometric Properties of Victimization and Perpetration Among Portuguese Adolescents.","authors":"Maria Vale, Marlene Matos","doi":"10.1177/08862605251368832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Technology-facilitated dating abuse (TFDA) is a prevalent and harmful experience for adolescents. However, the absence of validated instruments in Portugal hinders early detection, prevention, and intervention. To address this gap, this study aims to: (a) analyze the psychometric properties of the Technology-Facilitated Abuse in Relationships (TAR) scale, recognized as one of the most reliable measures in this field; (b) estimate prevalence rates; and (c) examine associations with gender, age, self-esteem, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and in-person dating violence. Between February and May 2023, 859 Portuguese adolescents (48.9% cisgender boys, 48.2% cisgender girls, and 2.9% gender-diverse; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 15.27, <i>SD</i> = 1.68) enrolled in grades 7 to 12 across 25 schools in northern and central Portugal completed an online questionnaire. The TAR scale was translated and adapted following international guidelines. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the original four-factor structure-humiliation, monitoring/control, sexual coercion, and threats-for both victimization and perpetration, with adequate reliability, convergent, and discriminant validity. Prevalence rates showed that 11.9% reported victimization, 9.4% perpetration, and 34.5% victimization-perpetration. Monitoring/control behaviors were the most prevalent and bidirectional form. Gender and age differences emerged: Cisgender boys were more often uninvolved in monitoring/control, while cisgender girls were more frequently victims-perpetrators; adolescents aged 14 to 16 reported higher rates of victimization, particularly sexual coercion. TFDA was negatively correlated with self-esteem and HRQOL, and positively correlated with in-person dating victimization and perpetration. These results support the Portuguese version of the TAR scale as a valid instrument for research, clinical, and forensic use.</p>","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":" ","pages":"8862605251368832"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251368832","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technology-facilitated dating abuse (TFDA) is a prevalent and harmful experience for adolescents. However, the absence of validated instruments in Portugal hinders early detection, prevention, and intervention. To address this gap, this study aims to: (a) analyze the psychometric properties of the Technology-Facilitated Abuse in Relationships (TAR) scale, recognized as one of the most reliable measures in this field; (b) estimate prevalence rates; and (c) examine associations with gender, age, self-esteem, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and in-person dating violence. Between February and May 2023, 859 Portuguese adolescents (48.9% cisgender boys, 48.2% cisgender girls, and 2.9% gender-diverse; Mage = 15.27, SD = 1.68) enrolled in grades 7 to 12 across 25 schools in northern and central Portugal completed an online questionnaire. The TAR scale was translated and adapted following international guidelines. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the original four-factor structure-humiliation, monitoring/control, sexual coercion, and threats-for both victimization and perpetration, with adequate reliability, convergent, and discriminant validity. Prevalence rates showed that 11.9% reported victimization, 9.4% perpetration, and 34.5% victimization-perpetration. Monitoring/control behaviors were the most prevalent and bidirectional form. Gender and age differences emerged: Cisgender boys were more often uninvolved in monitoring/control, while cisgender girls were more frequently victims-perpetrators; adolescents aged 14 to 16 reported higher rates of victimization, particularly sexual coercion. TFDA was negatively correlated with self-esteem and HRQOL, and positively correlated with in-person dating victimization and perpetration. These results support the Portuguese version of the TAR scale as a valid instrument for research, clinical, and forensic use.

人际关系量表中技术促进的虐待:葡萄牙青少年受害和犯罪的心理测量特征。
科技促进的约会虐待(TFDA)对青少年来说是一种普遍而有害的经历。然而,葡萄牙缺乏有效的仪器阻碍了早期发现、预防和干预。为了解决这一差距,本研究旨在:(a)分析技术促进的关系虐待(TAR)量表的心理测量特性,该量表被认为是该领域最可靠的测量方法之一;(b)估计患病率;(c)研究与性别、年龄、自尊、健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)和当面约会暴力的关系。2023年2月至5月期间,859名葡萄牙青少年(48.9%的顺性别男孩,48.2%的顺性别女孩,2.9%的性别多样化;Mage = 15.27, SD = 1.68)在葡萄牙北部和中部的25所学校就读于7至12年级,完成了一份在线问卷。TAR量表是按照国际准则进行翻译和调整的。验证性因子分析支持原来的四因素结构——羞辱、监视/控制、性胁迫和威胁——对受害和犯罪都具有足够的信度、收敛效度和区别效度。流行率显示,11.9%的人报告了受害,9.4%的人报告了施暴,34.5%的人报告了施暴-施暴。监视/控制行为是最普遍的双向形式。性别和年龄差异出现了:顺性男孩更经常不参与监督/控制,而顺性女孩更经常是受害者-加害者;14至16岁的青少年受害率更高,尤其是性胁迫。TFDA与自尊、HRQOL呈负相关,与约会受害、加害呈正相关。这些结果支持葡萄牙语版TAR量表作为研究、临床和法医使用的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信