Olivia Ziegler MD , Alicia C. Greene DO , Laura Fiorini MD , Eric D. Moyer MD , Mckell Quattrone MD , Neekita Jikaria MD , Mary C. Santos MD, Med , Rushin D. Brahmbhatt MD , Audrey S. Kulaylat MD, MSc
{"title":"Novel Low-Cost Low-Fidelity Abdominal Wall Simulation is Effective for Surgical Education","authors":"Olivia Ziegler MD , Alicia C. Greene DO , Laura Fiorini MD , Eric D. Moyer MD , Mckell Quattrone MD , Neekita Jikaria MD , Mary C. Santos MD, Med , Rushin D. Brahmbhatt MD , Audrey S. Kulaylat MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.08.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Surgical training increasingly employs simulation to facilitate resident education. However, simulations are often costly or use animal tissues, with attendant challenges in their financial and logistical feasibility. We present a foam abdominal wall model for abdominal access and ostomy creation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Layers of craft foams and fabrics are used to accurately simulate the layers of the abdominal wall, both on and off midline. Sixteen general surgery junior residents were proctored by a colorectal surgeon to complete each simulation. Residents completed pretask and post-task 5-point Likert-scale regarding comfort with technical skills. Improvement in these metrics was the primary outcome of interest. Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test was performed, preselected alpha was set at 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Residents reported that their confidence in all aspects of stoma creation improved following completion of the lab. On prelab <em>versus</em> postlab survey, residents significantly increased in overall technical comfort by 2 points (<em>P</em> < 0.001), comfort in siting the stoma by 1 point (<em>P</em> < 0.001), creating the trephine by 2 points (<em>P</em> < 0.001), and securing the stoma by 1 point (<em>P</em> < 0.001). On pretest <em>versus</em> post-test survey residents significantly improved their technical comfort with Veress needle by 2 points (<em>P</em> < 0.001), optical trocar by 1 point (<em>P</em> < 0.001), and Hasson by 1.5 points (<em>P</em> < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This model is easy to make and effective in increasing resident-reported comfort with ostomy formation and abdominal access. This offers an opportunity for residents to practice critical procedures in general surgery at low-cost and with no associated patient risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"315 ","pages":"Pages 79-85"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480425005426","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Surgical training increasingly employs simulation to facilitate resident education. However, simulations are often costly or use animal tissues, with attendant challenges in their financial and logistical feasibility. We present a foam abdominal wall model for abdominal access and ostomy creation.
Methods
Layers of craft foams and fabrics are used to accurately simulate the layers of the abdominal wall, both on and off midline. Sixteen general surgery junior residents were proctored by a colorectal surgeon to complete each simulation. Residents completed pretask and post-task 5-point Likert-scale regarding comfort with technical skills. Improvement in these metrics was the primary outcome of interest. Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test was performed, preselected alpha was set at 0.05.
Results
Residents reported that their confidence in all aspects of stoma creation improved following completion of the lab. On prelab versus postlab survey, residents significantly increased in overall technical comfort by 2 points (P < 0.001), comfort in siting the stoma by 1 point (P < 0.001), creating the trephine by 2 points (P < 0.001), and securing the stoma by 1 point (P < 0.001). On pretest versus post-test survey residents significantly improved their technical comfort with Veress needle by 2 points (P < 0.001), optical trocar by 1 point (P < 0.001), and Hasson by 1.5 points (P < 0.001).
Conclusions
This model is easy to make and effective in increasing resident-reported comfort with ostomy formation and abdominal access. This offers an opportunity for residents to practice critical procedures in general surgery at low-cost and with no associated patient risk.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories.
The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.