Effect of Different Adhesive Systems and Resin Cements on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Fiber Reinforced Posts to Root Dentin

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Maher S. Hajjaj
{"title":"Effect of Different Adhesive Systems and Resin Cements on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Fiber Reinforced Posts to Root Dentin","authors":"Maher S. Hajjaj","doi":"10.1002/jbm.b.35662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Good bond strength between fiber-reinforced posts (FRPs) and root dentin is essential for successful rehabilitation of endodontically treated teeth. 45 human premolar teeth were divided into three main groups (<i>n</i> = 15) based on bonding agent use: no bonding (control), light-cured (LC), and dual-cured (DC). Each group was further split by cement type: self-adhesive resin cement, bioactive resin cement, and core build-up material, totaling nine subgroups. The teeth were sectioned perpendicularly to the root surface to obtain two middle-root slices. After thermocycling, the push-out bond strength (PBS) test was performed and data were statistically analyzed with the ANOVA test followed by the post hoc Tukey test. Failure modes were examined under a stereomicroscope and statistically evaluated using the <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> test. There was a significant difference in the PBS between test groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001*). In control groups, core build-up material (Control/LZ = 7.6 ± 3.4 MPa) had significantly lower PBS than the rest of the groups, except Control/AB = 9.9 ± 3.3 MPa. The application of bonding agents significantly increased bond strength for bioactive cement (LC/AB = 14.8 ± 4.8 MPa and DC/AB = 17.7 ± 4.5 MPa) and core build-up material (LC/LZ = 20.4 ± 6.4 MPa and DC/LZ = 16.4 ± 3.8 MPa). Notably, self-adhesive resin cement achieved statistically similar PBS even without the application of bonding agent (Control/RX = 13.6 ± 3.1 MPa, LC/RX = 17.4 ± 5.5 MPa, and DC/RX = 17.0 ± 5.8 MPa). Self-adhesive resin cement can bond effectively to root dentin without additional bonding agents. However, bioactive and core build-up cements need bonding agents for optimal performance, highlighting the need to tailor bonding strategies to the specific cement used. Bonding FRPs to intra-radicular dentin was always a challenge. A strong bond to root dentin is an important factor to ensure the success and longevity of post and core restorations. This study provides great evidence for the significant influence of adhesive systems and resin cements on the bond strength of FRPs to root dentin. Using this study, clinicians will perform an informed choice of restorative materials for each clinical situation and select the best adhesive/cement combo to achieve good bond strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":15269,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","volume":"113 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jbm.b.35662","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.b.35662","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Good bond strength between fiber-reinforced posts (FRPs) and root dentin is essential for successful rehabilitation of endodontically treated teeth. 45 human premolar teeth were divided into three main groups (n = 15) based on bonding agent use: no bonding (control), light-cured (LC), and dual-cured (DC). Each group was further split by cement type: self-adhesive resin cement, bioactive resin cement, and core build-up material, totaling nine subgroups. The teeth were sectioned perpendicularly to the root surface to obtain two middle-root slices. After thermocycling, the push-out bond strength (PBS) test was performed and data were statistically analyzed with the ANOVA test followed by the post hoc Tukey test. Failure modes were examined under a stereomicroscope and statistically evaluated using the χ2 test. There was a significant difference in the PBS between test groups (p < 0.0001*). In control groups, core build-up material (Control/LZ = 7.6 ± 3.4 MPa) had significantly lower PBS than the rest of the groups, except Control/AB = 9.9 ± 3.3 MPa. The application of bonding agents significantly increased bond strength for bioactive cement (LC/AB = 14.8 ± 4.8 MPa and DC/AB = 17.7 ± 4.5 MPa) and core build-up material (LC/LZ = 20.4 ± 6.4 MPa and DC/LZ = 16.4 ± 3.8 MPa). Notably, self-adhesive resin cement achieved statistically similar PBS even without the application of bonding agent (Control/RX = 13.6 ± 3.1 MPa, LC/RX = 17.4 ± 5.5 MPa, and DC/RX = 17.0 ± 5.8 MPa). Self-adhesive resin cement can bond effectively to root dentin without additional bonding agents. However, bioactive and core build-up cements need bonding agents for optimal performance, highlighting the need to tailor bonding strategies to the specific cement used. Bonding FRPs to intra-radicular dentin was always a challenge. A strong bond to root dentin is an important factor to ensure the success and longevity of post and core restorations. This study provides great evidence for the significant influence of adhesive systems and resin cements on the bond strength of FRPs to root dentin. Using this study, clinicians will perform an informed choice of restorative materials for each clinical situation and select the best adhesive/cement combo to achieve good bond strength.

Abstract Image

不同粘结体系及树脂胶合剂对纤维增强桩与牙根质的外推结合强度的影响。
纤维增强桩与牙根之间良好的粘结强度是根管治疗后牙齿成功康复的关键。将45颗人类前磨牙根据粘结剂的使用情况分为3组(n = 15):无粘结组(control)、光固化组(LC)和双固化组(DC)。每组进一步按胶结物类型划分:自粘树脂胶结物、生物活性树脂胶结物和岩心构筑材料,共9个亚组。将牙齿垂直于根面切面,获得两根中间片。热循环后,进行推出键强度(PBS)检验,数据采用方差分析和事后Tukey检验进行统计分析。在体视显微镜下检查失效模式,并使用χ2检验进行统计评估。两组间PBS差异有统计学意义(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
199
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is a highly interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal serving the needs of biomaterials professionals who design, develop, produce and apply biomaterials and medical devices. It has the common focus of biomaterials applied to the human body and covers all disciplines where medical devices are used. Papers are published on biomaterials related to medical device development and manufacture, degradation in the body, nano- and biomimetic- biomaterials interactions, mechanics of biomaterials, implant retrieval and analysis, tissue-biomaterial surface interactions, wound healing, infection, drug delivery, standards and regulation of devices, animal and pre-clinical studies of biomaterials and medical devices, and tissue-biopolymer-material combination products. Manuscripts are published in one of six formats: • original research reports • short research and development reports • scientific reviews • current concepts articles • special reports • editorials Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials, Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. Manuscripts from all countries are invited but must be in English. Authors are not required to be members of the affiliated Societies, but members of these societies are encouraged to submit their work to the journal for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信