Association Between Improvement in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Prognosis of Patients with Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Daichi Maeda, Yuya Matsue, Yudai Fujimoto, Taishi Dotare, Tsutomu Sunayama, Kenji Yoshioka, Takeru Nabeta, Yoshihisa Naruse, Takeshi Kitai, Tatsunori Taniguchi, Hidekazu Tanaka, Ryota Morimoto, Yuichi Baba, Tohru Minamino
{"title":"Association Between Improvement in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Prognosis of Patients with Cardiac Sarcoidosis.","authors":"Daichi Maeda, Yuya Matsue, Yudai Fujimoto, Taishi Dotare, Tsutomu Sunayama, Kenji Yoshioka, Takeru Nabeta, Yoshihisa Naruse, Takeshi Kitai, Tatsunori Taniguchi, Hidekazu Tanaka, Ryota Morimoto, Yuichi Baba, Tohru Minamino","doi":"10.1536/ihj.25-273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Changes in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) have been reported; however, the prognostic implications remain unknown. This study aimed to investigate the predictive factors for LVEF improvement in patients with CS and the association between LVEF improvement and prognosis. This was a post hoc analysis of the ILLUMINATE-CS registry, a multicenter retrospective study on CS. Patients with a baseline LVEF ≥ 50% were excluded. LVEF improvement was defined as the difference between the baseline and follow-up echocardiographic results. Patients were stratified based on tertiles of LVEF improvement: 1st (≤ 0%, least improved), 2nd (0-9%), and 3rd (> 9%, most improved) tertile groups. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality after follow-up echocardiography. Overall, 188 patients with CS (age: 62.1 ± 10.7 years; male proportion: 42.6%) were analyzed. In the multivariate linear regression analysis, narrower QRS duration, lower baseline LVEF, and no prescription of beta-blockers at baseline were independently associated with greater LVEF improvement. During the median follow-up period of 407 days, 26 deaths occurred. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significant difference between the 3 groups (log-rank test, P = 0.002). In the adjusted Cox proportional hazard analysis, the 1st and 2nd tertile groups showed progressively higher mortality rates than the 3rd tertile group. Independent of other variables, LVEF improvement as a continuous variable was associated with a lower mortality rate. Among patients with CS, LVEF improvement was significantly associated with favorable outcomes. LVEF should be monitored if baseline LVEF is decreased.</p>","PeriodicalId":13711,"journal":{"name":"International heart journal","volume":"66 5","pages":"786-793"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.25-273","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Changes in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) have been reported; however, the prognostic implications remain unknown. This study aimed to investigate the predictive factors for LVEF improvement in patients with CS and the association between LVEF improvement and prognosis. This was a post hoc analysis of the ILLUMINATE-CS registry, a multicenter retrospective study on CS. Patients with a baseline LVEF ≥ 50% were excluded. LVEF improvement was defined as the difference between the baseline and follow-up echocardiographic results. Patients were stratified based on tertiles of LVEF improvement: 1st (≤ 0%, least improved), 2nd (0-9%), and 3rd (> 9%, most improved) tertile groups. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality after follow-up echocardiography. Overall, 188 patients with CS (age: 62.1 ± 10.7 years; male proportion: 42.6%) were analyzed. In the multivariate linear regression analysis, narrower QRS duration, lower baseline LVEF, and no prescription of beta-blockers at baseline were independently associated with greater LVEF improvement. During the median follow-up period of 407 days, 26 deaths occurred. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significant difference between the 3 groups (log-rank test, P = 0.002). In the adjusted Cox proportional hazard analysis, the 1st and 2nd tertile groups showed progressively higher mortality rates than the 3rd tertile group. Independent of other variables, LVEF improvement as a continuous variable was associated with a lower mortality rate. Among patients with CS, LVEF improvement was significantly associated with favorable outcomes. LVEF should be monitored if baseline LVEF is decreased.

心脏结节病患者左心室射血分数改善与预后的关系
心脏结节病(CS)患者左心室射血分数(LVEF)的变化已被报道;然而,其预后影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨CS患者LVEF改善的预测因素以及LVEF改善与预后的关系。这是对ILLUMINATE-CS注册表的事后分析,这是一项关于CS的多中心回顾性研究。排除基线LVEF≥50%的患者。LVEF改善被定义为基线和随访超声心动图结果的差异。根据LVEF改善的分位数对患者进行分层:第1组(≤0%,改善最少),第2组(0-9%),第3组(0-9%,改善最多)。主要结局为随访超声心动图后的全因死亡率。共分析188例CS患者(年龄:62.1±10.7岁,男性比例:42.6%)。在多变量线性回归分析中,较短的QRS持续时间、较低的基线LVEF和基线时未处方β受体阻滞剂与LVEF改善的独立相关。在407天的中位随访期间,发生26例死亡。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示3组间差异有统计学意义(log-rank检验,P = 0.002)。在调整后的Cox比例风险分析中,1和2个五分位数组的死亡率逐渐高于3个五分位数组。独立于其他变量,LVEF改善作为一个连续变量与较低的死亡率相关。在CS患者中,LVEF改善与良好的预后显著相关。如果基线LVEF下降,应监测LVEF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International heart journal
International heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
148
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Authors of research articles should disclose at the time of submission any financial arrangement they may have with a company whose product figures prominently in the submitted manuscript or with a company making a competing product. Such information will be held in confidence while the paper is under review and will not influence the editorial decision, but if the article is accepted for publication, the editors will usually discuss with the authors the manner in which such information is to be communicated to the reader.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信