The incidence and risk factor of atrial fibrillation after percutaneous coronary intervention.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Sheng Su, Le Li, Xi Peng, Likun Zhou, Yulong Xiong, Zhenhao Zhang, Yan Yao
{"title":"The incidence and risk factor of atrial fibrillation after percutaneous coronary intervention.","authors":"Sheng Su, Le Li, Xi Peng, Likun Zhou, Yulong Xiong, Zhenhao Zhang, Yan Yao","doi":"10.1186/s12872-025-05051-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation (AF) have poor clinical outcomes. However, the incidence of new-onset AF occurring after hospital discharge following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been well characterized. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of AF developing after PCI discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing PCI enrolled from January 2013 to December 2013. The primary endpoint was new-onset AF occurring after hospital discharge following PCI, defined as AF documented during follow-up and not present during the index PCI hospitalization. Cox proportional hazards regression models with covariate adjustments, complemented by Fine-Gray competing risk analyses, were employed to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for assessing AF risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 8,367 patients, 94 (1.1%) developed new-onset AF during 3-year follow-up, with no significant incidence difference between acute/chronic coronary syndromes (1.1% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.59). Age > 56.5 years (HR 2.97, 95%CI 1.72-5.12) and prior PCI (HR 1.73, 95%CI 1.13-2.65) independently predicted AF. Recalibration modestly improved all scores (the Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation score, CHA2DS2-VASc score, Atrial Fibrillation Risk Index, CHARGE-AF score) without statistical significance. CHARGE-AF outperformed other scores (all P < 0.05), while an age/ prior PCI-only model demonstrated non-inferior predictive capability versus CHARGE-AF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this large PCI cohort, a simplified model using only age > 56.5 years and prior PCI demonstrated non-inferior AF prediction compared to the best-performing CHARGE-AF score, supporting streamlined risk stratification for new-onset AF.</p>","PeriodicalId":9195,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"711"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-025-05051-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation (AF) have poor clinical outcomes. However, the incidence of new-onset AF occurring after hospital discharge following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been well characterized. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of AF developing after PCI discharge.

Methods: Patients undergoing PCI enrolled from January 2013 to December 2013. The primary endpoint was new-onset AF occurring after hospital discharge following PCI, defined as AF documented during follow-up and not present during the index PCI hospitalization. Cox proportional hazards regression models with covariate adjustments, complemented by Fine-Gray competing risk analyses, were employed to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for assessing AF risk factors.

Results: Among 8,367 patients, 94 (1.1%) developed new-onset AF during 3-year follow-up, with no significant incidence difference between acute/chronic coronary syndromes (1.1% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.59). Age > 56.5 years (HR 2.97, 95%CI 1.72-5.12) and prior PCI (HR 1.73, 95%CI 1.13-2.65) independently predicted AF. Recalibration modestly improved all scores (the Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation score, CHA2DS2-VASc score, Atrial Fibrillation Risk Index, CHARGE-AF score) without statistical significance. CHARGE-AF outperformed other scores (all P < 0.05), while an age/ prior PCI-only model demonstrated non-inferior predictive capability versus CHARGE-AF.

Conclusions: In this large PCI cohort, a simplified model using only age > 56.5 years and prior PCI demonstrated non-inferior AF prediction compared to the best-performing CHARGE-AF score, supporting streamlined risk stratification for new-onset AF.

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后房颤的发生率及危险因素分析。
背景:冠状动脉疾病合并心房颤动(AF)患者临床预后较差。然而,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后出院后新发房颤的发生率尚未得到很好的描述。本研究的目的是探讨PCI出院后房颤发生的发生率及危险因素。方法:2013年1月至2013年12月接受PCI治疗的患者。主要终点是PCI术后出院后发生的新发房颤,定义为随访期间记录的房颤,且在PCI住院期间未出现房颤。采用协变量调整的Cox比例风险回归模型,辅以Fine-Gray竞争风险分析,估计评估房颤危险因素的风险比(hr)和95%置信区间(ci)。结果:8367例患者中,94例(1.1%)在3年随访期间发生新发房颤,急性/慢性冠脉综合征发生率无显著差异(1.1% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.59)。年龄bbb50 - 56.5岁(HR 2.97, 95%CI 1.72-5.12)和既往PCI (HR 1.73, 95%CI 1.13-2.65)独立预测房颤。重新校准可适度改善所有评分(术后房颤评分、CHA2DS2-VASc评分、房颤风险指数、CHARGE-AF评分),但无统计学意义。结论:在这个大型PCI队列中,一个仅使用年龄50 - 56.5岁和既往PCI的简化模型与最佳表现的CHARGE-AF评分相比,证明房颤预测不差,支持简化的新发房颤风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
480
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the heart and circulatory system, as well as related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信