Complex competition interactions between Egyptian fruit bats and black rats in the real world.

IF 4.5 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Xing Chen, Lee Harten, Adi Rachum, Liraz Attia, Yossi Yovel
{"title":"Complex competition interactions between Egyptian fruit bats and black rats in the real world.","authors":"Xing Chen, Lee Harten, Adi Rachum, Liraz Attia, Yossi Yovel","doi":"10.1186/s12915-025-02380-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interspecific interactions, including competition and predation, are key drivers of ecological systems. Understanding these interactions remains challenging in the wild as it requires quantifying their effects, particularly the non-consumptive effects (NCEs) driven by predation risk. We conducted a 7-month study in a semi-natural open bat colony, monitoring interactions between Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus) and black rats (Rattus rattus) competing for food, where rats also pose a potential predation risk to the bats.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Video analysis revealed that bat responses to rats were fundamentally different from responses to conspecifics. The primary response was avoidance, with bat landings near food decreasing significantly when rats were present. For the 789 landings that did occur, bats showed increased vigilance and reduced foraging success, demonstrating clear NCEs. Crucially, bat foraging strategies were highly context-dependent, shifting with seasonal resource availability and rat abundance. During winter when rats were uncommon, the bats primarily employed predation risk-averse strategies (avoidance and vigilance). In spring, when rats were frequent, although there was clear temporal partitioning between the bat and the rat populations, some of the bats shifted to heterospecific interference competition, and occasionally attacked the rats to gain access to food-a behavior inconsistent with simple risk-aversion models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that the bat-rat interactions are dynamically modulated by resource availability, which alters rat presence and thereby the context-dependent interplay between interference competition and NCEs. This study provides rare quantitative evidence of how behaviorally flexible animals strategically manage interference competition and predation risk based on seasonal ecological conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9339,"journal":{"name":"BMC Biology","volume":"23 1","pages":"290"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487382/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-025-02380-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Interspecific interactions, including competition and predation, are key drivers of ecological systems. Understanding these interactions remains challenging in the wild as it requires quantifying their effects, particularly the non-consumptive effects (NCEs) driven by predation risk. We conducted a 7-month study in a semi-natural open bat colony, monitoring interactions between Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus) and black rats (Rattus rattus) competing for food, where rats also pose a potential predation risk to the bats.

Results: Video analysis revealed that bat responses to rats were fundamentally different from responses to conspecifics. The primary response was avoidance, with bat landings near food decreasing significantly when rats were present. For the 789 landings that did occur, bats showed increased vigilance and reduced foraging success, demonstrating clear NCEs. Crucially, bat foraging strategies were highly context-dependent, shifting with seasonal resource availability and rat abundance. During winter when rats were uncommon, the bats primarily employed predation risk-averse strategies (avoidance and vigilance). In spring, when rats were frequent, although there was clear temporal partitioning between the bat and the rat populations, some of the bats shifted to heterospecific interference competition, and occasionally attacked the rats to gain access to food-a behavior inconsistent with simple risk-aversion models.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that the bat-rat interactions are dynamically modulated by resource availability, which alters rat presence and thereby the context-dependent interplay between interference competition and NCEs. This study provides rare quantitative evidence of how behaviorally flexible animals strategically manage interference competition and predation risk based on seasonal ecological conditions.

现实世界中埃及果蝠和黑鼠之间复杂的竞争相互作用。
背景:种间相互作用,包括竞争和捕食,是生态系统的关键驱动力。了解这些相互作用在野外仍然具有挑战性,因为它需要量化它们的影响,特别是由捕食风险驱动的非消耗性影响(NCEs)。我们在半自然的开放蝙蝠群落中进行了为期7个月的研究,监测埃及果蝠(Rousettus aegyptiacus)和黑鼠(Rattus Rattus)之间争夺食物的相互作用,老鼠也对蝙蝠构成潜在的捕食风险。结果:视频分析显示,蝙蝠对大鼠的反应与对同种特异性的反应有着根本的不同。主要的反应是躲避,当老鼠出现时,蝙蝠在食物附近着陆的次数明显减少。对于确实发生的789次着陆,蝙蝠表现出更高的警惕性和更低的觅食成功率,这表明了明显的nce。关键是,蝙蝠的觅食策略高度依赖于环境,随着季节资源可用性和老鼠数量的变化而变化。在老鼠不常见的冬季,蝙蝠主要采用捕食风险规避策略(回避和警惕)。在春天,当老鼠频繁出现时,尽管蝙蝠和老鼠种群之间存在明显的时间划分,但一些蝙蝠转向了异种干扰竞争,偶尔攻击老鼠以获得食物——这种行为与简单的风险规避模型不一致。结论:我们的研究结果表明,蝙蝠与大鼠的相互作用受到资源可用性的动态调节,资源可用性改变了大鼠的存在,从而改变了干扰竞争与nce之间的情境依赖性相互作用。这项研究提供了罕见的定量证据,表明行为灵活的动物如何根据季节生态条件战略性地管理干扰竞争和捕食风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Biology
BMC Biology 生物-生物学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
1.90%
发文量
260
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Biology is a broad scope journal covering all areas of biology. Our content includes research articles, new methods and tools. BMC Biology also publishes reviews, Q&A, and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信