A simulation-based policy analysis of anticipatory action for cholera outbreaks, Democratic Republic of the Congo.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bulletin of the World Health Organization Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-03 DOI:10.2471/BLT.25.293226
Pei Shan Loo, Jefferson K Rajah, Hugo Jose Herrera de Leon, Birgit Kopainsky, Leonardo Milano
{"title":"A simulation-based policy analysis of anticipatory action for cholera outbreaks, Democratic Republic of the Congo.","authors":"Pei Shan Loo, Jefferson K Rajah, Hugo Jose Herrera de Leon, Birgit Kopainsky, Leonardo Milano","doi":"10.2471/BLT.25.293226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the effect of anticipatory action on outcomes during a cholera outbreak in a hypothetical health zone in the Democratic Republic of the Congo by means of a cholera response model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a system dynamics approach, we developed a cholera response model for the Democratic Republic of the Congo on the basis of a published cholera response simulation model for Yemen. The model evaluated four intervention scenarios: (i) existing responses to cholera outbreaks; (ii) anticipatory action (that is, immediate interventions); (iii) anticipatory action plus one vaccine dose; and (iv) anticipatory action plus two vaccine doses.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The model showed that immediate interventions can function as an essential bridge to comprehensive vaccination, particularly in resource-constrained settings where timely coordination is crucial. Moreover, anticipatory action can reduce the total number of cholera cases. However, booster vaccinations are crucial for preventing subsequent waves of infection due to waning immunity following single-dose vaccination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anticipatory action can enhance cholera outbreak management in low-resource settings by facilitating synergy between immediate and long-term interventions. The timing and coordination of interventions and the use of booster doses to prevent disease resurgence are all important. Dynamic models are useful for simulating outbreaks and can foster proactive, evidence-based public health planning, thereby supporting the shift from reactive to anticipatory strategies in alignment with the Global Task Force on Cholera Control's 2030 cholera roadmap. Continuous refinement of the model with real-world data will enhance its global applicability and help advance effective disease control strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9465,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","volume":"103 10","pages":"607-618"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.25.293226","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the effect of anticipatory action on outcomes during a cholera outbreak in a hypothetical health zone in the Democratic Republic of the Congo by means of a cholera response model.

Methods: Using a system dynamics approach, we developed a cholera response model for the Democratic Republic of the Congo on the basis of a published cholera response simulation model for Yemen. The model evaluated four intervention scenarios: (i) existing responses to cholera outbreaks; (ii) anticipatory action (that is, immediate interventions); (iii) anticipatory action plus one vaccine dose; and (iv) anticipatory action plus two vaccine doses.

Findings: The model showed that immediate interventions can function as an essential bridge to comprehensive vaccination, particularly in resource-constrained settings where timely coordination is crucial. Moreover, anticipatory action can reduce the total number of cholera cases. However, booster vaccinations are crucial for preventing subsequent waves of infection due to waning immunity following single-dose vaccination.

Conclusion: Anticipatory action can enhance cholera outbreak management in low-resource settings by facilitating synergy between immediate and long-term interventions. The timing and coordination of interventions and the use of booster doses to prevent disease resurgence are all important. Dynamic models are useful for simulating outbreaks and can foster proactive, evidence-based public health planning, thereby supporting the shift from reactive to anticipatory strategies in alignment with the Global Task Force on Cholera Control's 2030 cholera roadmap. Continuous refinement of the model with real-world data will enhance its global applicability and help advance effective disease control strategies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于模拟的刚果民主共和国霍乱暴发预期行动政策分析。
目的:通过霍乱反应模型探讨在刚果民主共和国一个假想卫生区霍乱暴发期间预期行动对结果的影响。方法:利用系统动力学方法,我们在已发表的也门霍乱反应模拟模型的基础上开发了刚果民主共和国的霍乱反应模型。该模型评估了四种干预方案:(一)现有的霍乱疫情应对措施;预期行动(即立即干预);㈢预期行动加一剂疫苗;(四)预期行动加上两剂疫苗。研究结果:该模型表明,即时干预措施可以作为实现全面疫苗接种的重要桥梁,特别是在资源受限的环境中,及时协调至关重要。此外,预期行动可以减少霍乱病例的总数。然而,加强疫苗接种对于预防由于单剂疫苗接种后免疫力下降而导致的后续感染浪潮至关重要。结论:预期行动可通过促进即时和长期干预措施之间的协同作用,加强资源匮乏地区霍乱疫情管理。干预措施的时机和协调以及使用加强剂量以预防疾病复发都很重要。动态模型有助于模拟疫情,并可促进积极主动、以证据为基础的公共卫生规划,从而支持根据全球霍乱控制工作队的2030年霍乱路线图,从被动战略转向预期战略。用真实世界的数据不断改进模型将增强其全球适用性,并有助于推进有效的疾病控制策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Bulletin of the World Health Organization 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
0.90%
发文量
317
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of the World Health Organization Journal Overview: Leading public health journal Peer-reviewed monthly journal Special focus on developing countries Global scope and authority Top public and environmental health journal Impact factor of 6.818 (2018), according to Web of Science ranking Audience: Essential reading for public health decision-makers and researchers Provides blend of research, well-informed opinion, and news
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信