Classify the fNIRS signals of first-episode drug-naive MDD patients with or without suicidal ideation using machine learning.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Lan Mou, Yuqi Shen, Qian Tan, Boyuan Wu, Jiayun Zhu, Zefeng Wang, Zhongxia Shen, Xinhua Shen
{"title":"Classify the fNIRS signals of first-episode drug-naive MDD patients with or without suicidal ideation using machine learning.","authors":"Lan Mou, Yuqi Shen, Qian Tan, Boyuan Wu, Jiayun Zhu, Zefeng Wang, Zhongxia Shen, Xinhua Shen","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-07394-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) has a high suicide risk, and current diagnosis of suicidal ideation (SI) mainly relies on subjective tools.Neuroimaging techniques, including functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), offer potential for identifying objective biomarkers. fNIRS, with its advantages of non-invasiveness, portability, and tolerance of mild movement, provides a feasible approach for clinical research. However, previous fNIRS studies on MDD and suicidal ideation have inconsistent results due to patient and methodological differences.Traditional machine learning in fNIRS data analysis has limitations, while deep - learning methods like one-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) are under-explored. This study aims to use fNIRS to explore prefrontal function in first-episode drug-naive MDD patients with suicidal ideation and evaluate fNIRS as a diagnostic tool via deep learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 91 first-episode drug-naive MDD patients were included and categorized into two groups based on their scores on the suicidal item of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17): 40 patients with suicidal ideation (SIs) and 51 patients without suicidal ideation (NSIs). Concurrently, 39 healthy controls (HCs) were recruited. We utilized fNIRS to measure the hemodynamic responses in the prefrontal cortex of each group during the verbal fluency task (VFT). A Kruskal-Wallis test was conducted to analyze the changes in oxyhemoglobin concentration among the three groups, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for each region of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to HCs, NSIs exhibited significantly reduced activation in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC), frontopolar prefrontal cortex (FPC), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), while SIs showed significantly decreased activation in the entire prefrontal cortex. The activation values of SIs in DLPFC, FPC, and OFC were significantly lower than those of NSIs. The highest accuracy for the three-class classification was observed in the lFPC, reaching 69.80%. The SIs group had the largest area under the ROC curve (AUC = 0.88) in the rFPC, while the NSIs group had the largest area under the ROC curve (AUC = 0.88) in the rDLPFC. The HCs group exhibited the largest area under the ROC curve (AUC = 0.92) in the rDLPFC and rVLPFC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DLPFC, FPC, and OFC may serve as biomarker brain regions for identifying suicidal ideation in first-episode drug-naive MDD patients. The fNIRS-VFT task can be utilized clinically as an auxiliary diagnostic tool for mental disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"909"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07394-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) has a high suicide risk, and current diagnosis of suicidal ideation (SI) mainly relies on subjective tools.Neuroimaging techniques, including functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), offer potential for identifying objective biomarkers. fNIRS, with its advantages of non-invasiveness, portability, and tolerance of mild movement, provides a feasible approach for clinical research. However, previous fNIRS studies on MDD and suicidal ideation have inconsistent results due to patient and methodological differences.Traditional machine learning in fNIRS data analysis has limitations, while deep - learning methods like one-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) are under-explored. This study aims to use fNIRS to explore prefrontal function in first-episode drug-naive MDD patients with suicidal ideation and evaluate fNIRS as a diagnostic tool via deep learning.

Methods: A total of 91 first-episode drug-naive MDD patients were included and categorized into two groups based on their scores on the suicidal item of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17): 40 patients with suicidal ideation (SIs) and 51 patients without suicidal ideation (NSIs). Concurrently, 39 healthy controls (HCs) were recruited. We utilized fNIRS to measure the hemodynamic responses in the prefrontal cortex of each group during the verbal fluency task (VFT). A Kruskal-Wallis test was conducted to analyze the changes in oxyhemoglobin concentration among the three groups, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for each region of interest.

Results: Compared to HCs, NSIs exhibited significantly reduced activation in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC), frontopolar prefrontal cortex (FPC), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), while SIs showed significantly decreased activation in the entire prefrontal cortex. The activation values of SIs in DLPFC, FPC, and OFC were significantly lower than those of NSIs. The highest accuracy for the three-class classification was observed in the lFPC, reaching 69.80%. The SIs group had the largest area under the ROC curve (AUC = 0.88) in the rFPC, while the NSIs group had the largest area under the ROC curve (AUC = 0.88) in the rDLPFC. The HCs group exhibited the largest area under the ROC curve (AUC = 0.92) in the rDLPFC and rVLPFC.

Conclusion: DLPFC, FPC, and OFC may serve as biomarker brain regions for identifying suicidal ideation in first-episode drug-naive MDD patients. The fNIRS-VFT task can be utilized clinically as an auxiliary diagnostic tool for mental disorders.

使用机器学习对有或无自杀意念的首发药物型MDD患者的fNIRS信号进行分类。
背景:重度抑郁障碍(MDD)具有较高的自杀风险,目前对自杀意念(SI)的诊断主要依赖于主观工具。神经成像技术,包括功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS),为识别客观生物标志物提供了潜力。fNIRS具有非侵入性、便携性和轻度运动耐受性等优点,为临床研究提供了可行的方法。然而,由于患者和方法的差异,以往关于重度抑郁症和自杀意念的fNIRS研究结果不一致。传统的机器学习在近红外光谱数据分析中存在局限性,而一维卷积神经网络(CNN)等深度学习方法尚未得到充分开发。本研究旨在利用fNIRS来探讨首发药物未发作的MDD患者自杀意念的前额叶功能,并通过深度学习评估fNIRS作为诊断工具的价值。方法:将91例首发无药MDD患者按17项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAMD-17)自杀项得分分为两组:有自杀意念(si)患者40例和无自杀意念(nsi)患者51例。同时,招募了39名健康对照(hc)。我们利用近红外光谱(fNIRS)测量了各组在言语流畅性任务(VFT)期间前额叶皮层的血流动力学反应。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验分析三组患者血氧蛋白浓度的变化,并对每个感兴趣的区域生成受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。结果:与hc相比,nsi在左背外侧前额叶皮质(lDLPFC)、额极前额叶皮质(FPC)、眶额叶皮质(OFC)和腹外侧前额叶皮质(VLPFC)的激活显著降低,而si在整个前额叶皮质的激活显著降低。在DLPFC、FPC和OFC中,si的激活值明显低于nsi。lFPC的三类分类准确率最高,达到69.80%。在rFPC中,SIs组的ROC曲线下面积最大(AUC = 0.88),而在rDLPFC中,NSIs组的ROC曲线下面积最大(AUC = 0.88)。hcc组rDLPFC和rVLPFC的ROC曲线下面积最大(AUC = 0.92)。结论:DLPFC、FPC和OFC可能是识别首发药物幼稚型MDD患者自杀意念的生物标志物脑区。fNIRS-VFT任务在临床上可作为精神障碍的辅助诊断工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信