{"title":"Assessing Community-Based interventions effectiveness on hypertension prevention and control: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Saber Azami-Aghdash, Nasrin Joudyian, Sahar Jafari, Shahin Karami, Ramin Rezapour","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-24283-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Designing and implementing community-based interventions for the prevention and control of hypertension is of particular importance. The aim of the present study is to systematically review the effectiveness of community-based interventions conducted for the prevention and control of hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for this systematic review and meta-analysis were collected from the databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, manual search of relevant journals, Google Scholar, searching reference lists of selected articles, and unpublished sources from the beginning of the year 2000 to 2025. A random effects model in Stata:16 software was used for the meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ultimately, 68 articles were included in the study. Interventions were effective in 54 studies and ineffective in 14 studies. Meta-analysis results of 34 studies showed that the interventions reduced the mean systolic blood pressure by 7.26 mmHg [5.32-9.2, CI = 95%] and diastolic blood pressure by 2.77 mmHg [1.81-3.73, CI = 95%]. Overall, interventions conducted in low- and middle-income countries, in healthcare centers, as single-component interventions, and with fewer repetition periods were more effective. Meta-regression results indicated that the variables of patient follow-up duration (weeks) and the frequency of intervention (weeks) did not predict the outcomes of interventions on changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The heterogeneity of study results was high, but the likelihood of publication bias was very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Due to the significant effectiveness of community-based interventions in preventing and controlling hypertension, the development and implementation of additional such interventions are strongly recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"3253"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-24283-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Designing and implementing community-based interventions for the prevention and control of hypertension is of particular importance. The aim of the present study is to systematically review the effectiveness of community-based interventions conducted for the prevention and control of hypertension.
Methods: Data for this systematic review and meta-analysis were collected from the databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, manual search of relevant journals, Google Scholar, searching reference lists of selected articles, and unpublished sources from the beginning of the year 2000 to 2025. A random effects model in Stata:16 software was used for the meta-analysis.
Results: Ultimately, 68 articles were included in the study. Interventions were effective in 54 studies and ineffective in 14 studies. Meta-analysis results of 34 studies showed that the interventions reduced the mean systolic blood pressure by 7.26 mmHg [5.32-9.2, CI = 95%] and diastolic blood pressure by 2.77 mmHg [1.81-3.73, CI = 95%]. Overall, interventions conducted in low- and middle-income countries, in healthcare centers, as single-component interventions, and with fewer repetition periods were more effective. Meta-regression results indicated that the variables of patient follow-up duration (weeks) and the frequency of intervention (weeks) did not predict the outcomes of interventions on changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The heterogeneity of study results was high, but the likelihood of publication bias was very low.
Conclusion: Due to the significant effectiveness of community-based interventions in preventing and controlling hypertension, the development and implementation of additional such interventions are strongly recommended.
背景:设计和实施社区干预措施预防和控制高血压是特别重要的。本研究的目的是系统地回顾以社区为基础的高血压预防和控制干预措施的有效性。方法:本系统评价和荟萃分析的数据来自PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、人工检索相关期刊、谷歌Scholar、检索精选文章的参考文献列表以及2000年初至2025年未发表的文献。meta分析采用Stata:16软件中的随机效应模型。结果:最终有68篇文章被纳入研究。干预措施在54项研究中有效,14项研究无效。34项研究的荟萃分析结果显示,干预措施使平均收缩压降低7.26 mmHg [5.32-9.2, CI = 95%],舒张压降低2.77 mmHg [1.81-3.73, CI = 95%]。总体而言,在低收入和中等收入国家的医疗保健中心进行的干预措施,作为单一成分的干预措施,重复周期更短,更有效。meta回归结果显示,患者随访时间(周)和干预频率(周)等变量不能预测干预对收缩压和舒张压变化的影响。研究结果的异质性较高,但发表偏倚的可能性很低。结论:鉴于社区干预措施在预防和控制高血压方面的显著效果,强烈建议开发和实施其他此类干预措施。
期刊介绍:
BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.