Sampath Kumar Srinivasan, Pitchaimani Govindharaj, Prabu Gopal
{"title":"Reproductive autonomy of visually impaired women: a cross-sectional study in Coimbatore and Tiruchirappalli districts, Tamil Nadu.","authors":"Sampath Kumar Srinivasan, Pitchaimani Govindharaj, Prabu Gopal","doi":"10.1186/s13104-025-07496-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Reproductive autonomy is a fundamental human right, yet it remains a complex issue for visually impaired women. Therefore, this study aims to explore reproductive autonomy and examine the factors associated with reproductive autonomy among visually impaired women.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cross-sectional study was carried out in Tamil Nadu, India, involving 333 visually impaired women aged 18-44 (36.09 ± 5.97) from two districts. The study used a Reproductive Autonomy Scale (RAS) to assess reproductive autonomy, which comprises decision-making, freedom from coercion, and communication domains. The respondents had mean scores of 2.13 for decision-making, 2.05 for coercion, 3.74 for communication. The study found no significant differences in age, education, occupation, house ownership, community, and religion. Significant differences were found in the number of children across all domains, and the total RAS scores indicated that women with two or more children had higher reproductive autonomy. In spouse's disability, spouses with disabilities scored higher in decision-making domain compared to spouses without disabilities. The study concluded that the visually impaired women had a higher degree of reproductive autonomy. The results highlight that most women experience shared reproductive decision-making and supportive communication with their partners, with minimal instances of coercion.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"18 1","pages":"413"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07496-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Reproductive autonomy is a fundamental human right, yet it remains a complex issue for visually impaired women. Therefore, this study aims to explore reproductive autonomy and examine the factors associated with reproductive autonomy among visually impaired women.
Results: A cross-sectional study was carried out in Tamil Nadu, India, involving 333 visually impaired women aged 18-44 (36.09 ± 5.97) from two districts. The study used a Reproductive Autonomy Scale (RAS) to assess reproductive autonomy, which comprises decision-making, freedom from coercion, and communication domains. The respondents had mean scores of 2.13 for decision-making, 2.05 for coercion, 3.74 for communication. The study found no significant differences in age, education, occupation, house ownership, community, and religion. Significant differences were found in the number of children across all domains, and the total RAS scores indicated that women with two or more children had higher reproductive autonomy. In spouse's disability, spouses with disabilities scored higher in decision-making domain compared to spouses without disabilities. The study concluded that the visually impaired women had a higher degree of reproductive autonomy. The results highlight that most women experience shared reproductive decision-making and supportive communication with their partners, with minimal instances of coercion.
BMC Research NotesBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍:
BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.