Bridging the Gap: A comprehensive review and cross-check analysis for China's Non-CO2 greenhouse gas emission estimates.

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Liting Hu, Xuekun Fang
{"title":"Bridging the Gap: A comprehensive review and cross-check analysis for China's Non-CO<sub>2</sub> greenhouse gas emission estimates.","authors":"Liting Hu, Xuekun Fang","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-CO<sub>2</sub> greenhouse gases (GHGs), mainly including CH<sub>4</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O, SF<sub>6</sub>, HFCs, PFCs, and NF<sub>3</sub>, contribute significantly to climate change, yet their emission estimates exhibit substantial uncertainties. This study provides a comprehensive assessment of China's non-CO<sub>2</sub> GHG emission estimates by systematically analyzing over 100 research articles encompassing both bottom-up and top-down studies. Our analysis reveals that multi-year average uncertainties in non-CO<sub>2</sub> GHG estimates (±21-38 %) substantially exceed those calculated based on China's National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, and are approximately 4-7 times greater than CO<sub>2</sub> emission uncertainties (±5.6-5.9 %). These wide estimation ranges have persisted despite substantial increases in research studies, indicating fundamental methodological challenges, which may hinder the mitigation policymaking. Through systematic cross-check between bottom-up and top-down approaches, we identify three primary sources of uncertainty: (1) inaccessible or inconsistent activity data, (2) incomplete emission source coverage, and (3) outdated emission factors in bottom-up studies; while top-down estimates are affected by limitations in inversion systems and scarce observational data. This work addresses critical knowledge gaps and provides specific pathways for improving the accuracy of China's non-CO<sub>2</sub> GHG emissions quantification, supporting more effective climate policy development and emission reduction strategies. The findings directly inform China's climate mitigation policies and contribute to global efforts in achieving the Paris Agreement targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"394 ","pages":"127362"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127362","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-CO2 greenhouse gases (GHGs), mainly including CH4, N2O, SF6, HFCs, PFCs, and NF3, contribute significantly to climate change, yet their emission estimates exhibit substantial uncertainties. This study provides a comprehensive assessment of China's non-CO2 GHG emission estimates by systematically analyzing over 100 research articles encompassing both bottom-up and top-down studies. Our analysis reveals that multi-year average uncertainties in non-CO2 GHG estimates (±21-38 %) substantially exceed those calculated based on China's National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, and are approximately 4-7 times greater than CO2 emission uncertainties (±5.6-5.9 %). These wide estimation ranges have persisted despite substantial increases in research studies, indicating fundamental methodological challenges, which may hinder the mitigation policymaking. Through systematic cross-check between bottom-up and top-down approaches, we identify three primary sources of uncertainty: (1) inaccessible or inconsistent activity data, (2) incomplete emission source coverage, and (3) outdated emission factors in bottom-up studies; while top-down estimates are affected by limitations in inversion systems and scarce observational data. This work addresses critical knowledge gaps and provides specific pathways for improving the accuracy of China's non-CO2 GHG emissions quantification, supporting more effective climate policy development and emission reduction strategies. The findings directly inform China's climate mitigation policies and contribute to global efforts in achieving the Paris Agreement targets.

弥合差距:中国非二氧化碳温室气体排放估算的全面回顾与交叉检验分析。
非co2温室气体(ghg),主要包括CH4、N2O、SF6、hfc、pfc和NF3,对气候变化有重要贡献,但其排放估算存在很大的不确定性。本研究通过系统分析100多篇自下而上和自上而下的研究论文,对中国非co2温室气体排放估算进行了全面评估。我们的分析表明,非CO2温室气体估算的多年平均不确定性(±21- 38%)大大超过了基于中国国家温室气体清单计算的多年平均不确定性,大约是CO2排放不确定性(±5.6- 5.9%)的4-7倍。尽管大量增加了研究,但这些较宽的估计范围仍然存在,这表明在方法上存在根本性挑战,这可能阻碍减缓政策的制定。通过对自下而上和自上而下方法的系统交叉检查,我们确定了三个主要的不确定性来源:(1)不可访问或不一致的活动数据;(2)不完整的排放源覆盖;(3)自下而上研究中过时的排放因子;而自上而下的估计受到反演系统的限制和观测数据的缺乏的影响。这项工作填补了关键的知识空白,并为提高中国非二氧化碳温室气体排放量化的准确性提供了具体途径,为更有效的气候政策制定和减排战略提供了支持。研究结果为中国的气候减缓政策提供了直接信息,并为实现《巴黎协定》目标的全球努力做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信