Successful treatment of five cases of catatonia treated with guanfacine without ECT: a case series from a psychiatric hospital in Japan.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Hiroki Saito, Mikael Tiger, Ryosuke Arakawa, Amane Tateno
{"title":"Successful treatment of five cases of catatonia treated with guanfacine without ECT: a case series from a psychiatric hospital in Japan.","authors":"Hiroki Saito, Mikael Tiger, Ryosuke Arakawa, Amane Tateno","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-07349-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Catatonia, including malignant catatonia, is a severe neuropsychiatric condition historically associated with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. However, recent diagnostic frameworks, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR) and the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11), offer a broader understanding. These systems classify catatonia not as a standalone diagnosis but as a specifier that may occur alongside various psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia spectrum disorders, mood disorders, neurodevelopmental disorders, or medical conditions. Although electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and benzodiazepines are considered gold standard treatments for catatonia, many healthcare settings lack access to ECT, and certain physical conditions make ECT relatively contraindicated or a high-risk option. Guanfacine, a central adrenergic α2A receptor agonist, has a similar mechanism of action as the sedative dexmedetomidine, which has shown efficacy in treating catatonia. However, the effectiveness of guanfacine in this context has not been tested.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>We report five cases of catatonia (including malignant catatonia) associated with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. These cases were treated either in a psychiatric hospital or an outpatient clinic, both of which lacked access to ECT. Extended-release formulation of guanfacine was administered alongside temporary benzodiazepine use, and treatment outcomes were observed. All five patients were in syndromal remission from catatonia following treatment that included guanfacine in combination with other pharmacological interventions. Mild to moderate side effects were observed. These included dizziness and fatigue in one patient, and hypotension and bradycardia in two others. All adverse effects resolved with dose reduction. Complications of catatonia included impaired oral intake requiring nutritional support in two patients and urinary catheterization due to immobility in two patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that guanfacine may serve as a safe and effective alternative to ECT for catatonia in settings where ECT is unavailable or relatively contraindicated. The clinical courses also suggest that dysfunction of the central noradrenergic system may contribute to the pathophysiology of catatonia, and that guanfacine's selective α2A adrenoceptor modulation may play a role in symptom improvement. Further research is needed to validate these findings and clarify the underlying mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"903"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07349-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Catatonia, including malignant catatonia, is a severe neuropsychiatric condition historically associated with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. However, recent diagnostic frameworks, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR) and the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11), offer a broader understanding. These systems classify catatonia not as a standalone diagnosis but as a specifier that may occur alongside various psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia spectrum disorders, mood disorders, neurodevelopmental disorders, or medical conditions. Although electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and benzodiazepines are considered gold standard treatments for catatonia, many healthcare settings lack access to ECT, and certain physical conditions make ECT relatively contraindicated or a high-risk option. Guanfacine, a central adrenergic α2A receptor agonist, has a similar mechanism of action as the sedative dexmedetomidine, which has shown efficacy in treating catatonia. However, the effectiveness of guanfacine in this context has not been tested.

Case presentation: We report five cases of catatonia (including malignant catatonia) associated with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. These cases were treated either in a psychiatric hospital or an outpatient clinic, both of which lacked access to ECT. Extended-release formulation of guanfacine was administered alongside temporary benzodiazepine use, and treatment outcomes were observed. All five patients were in syndromal remission from catatonia following treatment that included guanfacine in combination with other pharmacological interventions. Mild to moderate side effects were observed. These included dizziness and fatigue in one patient, and hypotension and bradycardia in two others. All adverse effects resolved with dose reduction. Complications of catatonia included impaired oral intake requiring nutritional support in two patients and urinary catheterization due to immobility in two patients.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that guanfacine may serve as a safe and effective alternative to ECT for catatonia in settings where ECT is unavailable or relatively contraindicated. The clinical courses also suggest that dysfunction of the central noradrenergic system may contribute to the pathophysiology of catatonia, and that guanfacine's selective α2A adrenoceptor modulation may play a role in symptom improvement. Further research is needed to validate these findings and clarify the underlying mechanisms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用胍法辛治疗紧张症不经电痉挛治疗5例:日本某精神病院病例系列分析。
背景:紧张症,包括恶性紧张症,是一种历史上与精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍相关的严重神经精神疾病。然而,最近的诊断框架,如精神障碍诊断和统计手册,第五版,文本修订版(DSM-5-TR)和国际疾病分类,第11版(ICD-11),提供了更广泛的理解。这些系统不是将紧张症作为一种独立的诊断,而是作为一种可能与各种精神疾病(包括精神分裂症谱系障碍、情绪障碍、神经发育障碍或医疗状况)一起发生的说明。虽然电痉挛疗法(ECT)和苯二氮卓类药物被认为是治疗紧张症的金标准,但许多医疗机构缺乏ECT,某些身体状况使ECT相对禁忌或高风险的选择。胍法辛是一种中枢肾上腺素能α2A受体激动剂,其作用机制与镇静剂右美托咪定相似,已显示出治疗紧张症的疗效。然而,胍法辛在这种情况下的有效性尚未得到测试。病例介绍:我们报告五例紧张症(包括恶性紧张症)与精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍。这些病例要么在精神病院接受治疗,要么在门诊接受治疗,这两家医院都没有电痉挛疗法。在暂时使用苯二氮卓的同时给予胍法辛缓释制剂,观察治疗结果。所有5例患者在使用胍法辛联合其他药物干预治疗后,紧张症症状均得到缓解。观察到轻度至中度的副作用。其中包括一名患者的头晕和疲劳,另外两名患者的低血压和心动过缓。所有不良反应均随剂量减少而消失。紧张症的并发症包括2例患者需要营养支持的口服摄入受损,2例患者由于不活动而需要导尿。结论:这些发现表明,胍法辛可以作为一种安全有效的替代ECT治疗紧张症的环境中,ECT不可用或相对禁忌症。临床过程还提示中枢去甲肾上腺素能系统功能障碍可能参与了紧张症的病理生理,胍法辛选择性调节α2A肾上腺素能受体可能在症状改善中起作用。需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现并阐明潜在的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信