Nonlinear impact of artificial intelligence on clean energy transformation: The asymmetric role of heterogeneous environment regulations.

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Xiaoyue Huang, Jian Tang, Yadi Chen, Sen Qiao
{"title":"Nonlinear impact of artificial intelligence on clean energy transformation: The asymmetric role of heterogeneous environment regulations.","authors":"Xiaoyue Huang, Jian Tang, Yadi Chen, Sen Qiao","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the critical period of the global clean energy transformation (CET), the mechanism by which artificial intelligence (AI) and environmental regulations jointly drive the CET is still unclear. Using panel data from Chinese prefecture-level cities spanning 2006 to 2022, and linear interpolation is used to process some missing data. This study employs the two-way fixed effects model and Spatial Durbin Model to examine the impact of AI on CET and spatial spillover effects, as well as the role of heterogeneous environmental regulations. The findings reveal that a \"U-shaped\" relationship exists between AI and CET, which is more significant in central and northeastern regions, large cities, non-resource-based and non-low-carbon pilot cities in China, further verifying Porter's hypothesis. Importantly, there is an asymmetric nonlinear moderating effect. Formal environmental regulation (FER) has a positive moderating effect. Initially, it exacerbates the weak inhibition of AI due to cost effect, but in maturity, it strengthens the promotion of AI by technical synergy. However, informal environmental regulation (IER) is opposite. It is insignificant initially due to flexible constraints, but in maturity, the positive effect of AI is weakened due to the false compliance. In addition, AI in neighboring areas has a positive spillover effect on local CET. These findings provide key decision-making basis for the government to maximize the role of AI in enabling CET by formulating differentiated environmental regulation policies in stages.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"394 ","pages":"127457"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127457","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the critical period of the global clean energy transformation (CET), the mechanism by which artificial intelligence (AI) and environmental regulations jointly drive the CET is still unclear. Using panel data from Chinese prefecture-level cities spanning 2006 to 2022, and linear interpolation is used to process some missing data. This study employs the two-way fixed effects model and Spatial Durbin Model to examine the impact of AI on CET and spatial spillover effects, as well as the role of heterogeneous environmental regulations. The findings reveal that a "U-shaped" relationship exists between AI and CET, which is more significant in central and northeastern regions, large cities, non-resource-based and non-low-carbon pilot cities in China, further verifying Porter's hypothesis. Importantly, there is an asymmetric nonlinear moderating effect. Formal environmental regulation (FER) has a positive moderating effect. Initially, it exacerbates the weak inhibition of AI due to cost effect, but in maturity, it strengthens the promotion of AI by technical synergy. However, informal environmental regulation (IER) is opposite. It is insignificant initially due to flexible constraints, but in maturity, the positive effect of AI is weakened due to the false compliance. In addition, AI in neighboring areas has a positive spillover effect on local CET. These findings provide key decision-making basis for the government to maximize the role of AI in enabling CET by formulating differentiated environmental regulation policies in stages.

人工智能对清洁能源转型的非线性影响:异质环境规制的不对称作用。
在全球清洁能源转型的关键时期,人工智能(AI)和环境法规共同推动清洁能源转型的机制尚不清楚。利用2006 - 2022年中国地级市面板数据,采用线性插值法对部分缺失数据进行处理。本研究采用双向固定效应模型和空间德宾模型,考察人工智能对CET的影响和空间溢出效应,以及异质性环境规制的作用。研究结果表明,人工智能与CET之间存在“u型”关系,且在中国中部和东北地区、大城市、非资源型和非低碳试点城市中更为显著,进一步验证了波特的假设。重要的是,存在不对称的非线性调节效应。正式环境规制具有正向调节作用。初期由于成本效应加剧了对人工智能的弱抑制,成熟后通过技术协同加强了对人工智能的促进。而非正式环境规制则与之相反。在初始阶段,由于约束条件的灵活,它的积极作用是微不足道的,但在成熟阶段,由于虚假合规,人工智能的积极作用被削弱。此外,邻近地区人工智能对当地CET具有正向溢出效应。这些发现为政府分阶段制定差别化的环境监管政策,最大限度地发挥人工智能在实现CET中的作用提供了关键的决策依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信