Analysis of the Working Group's Recommendations and COP-16 Decision 16/2 on Digital Sequence Information

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Bruna Gomes Maia, Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde
{"title":"Analysis of the Working Group's Recommendations and COP-16 Decision 16/2 on Digital Sequence Information","authors":"Bruna Gomes Maia,&nbsp;Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Recent advancements in molecular biology and bioinformatics have introduced innovative methods for accessing genetic information, which are not yet encompassed by the existing frameworks of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Nagoya Protocol. Technologies utilizing Digital Sequence Information often eliminate the need for physical samples by relying on genetic data stored digitally through private and public databases. The CBD and the Nagoya Protocol were originally designed to regulate access to genetic resources in their physical form. However, the increasing reliance on DSI for developing biotechnological products has revealed a significant necessity to update the international Access and Benefit-Sharing framework. To address this issue, the 15th meeting of the Conference of the Parties approved Decision 15/9, which calls for the establishment of a mechanism to include DSI in the international ABS regime. This decision led to the creation of a Working Group on Benefit-sharing from the use of DSI (WGDSI). This paper aims to critically analyze the multilateral benefit-sharing modalities recommended by the WGDSI and those proposed by Decision 16/2 at COP-16. The work also proposes a new solution to improve the mechanism's ability to raise funds for biodiversity conservation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"16 4","pages":"751-761"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.70013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advancements in molecular biology and bioinformatics have introduced innovative methods for accessing genetic information, which are not yet encompassed by the existing frameworks of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Nagoya Protocol. Technologies utilizing Digital Sequence Information often eliminate the need for physical samples by relying on genetic data stored digitally through private and public databases. The CBD and the Nagoya Protocol were originally designed to regulate access to genetic resources in their physical form. However, the increasing reliance on DSI for developing biotechnological products has revealed a significant necessity to update the international Access and Benefit-Sharing framework. To address this issue, the 15th meeting of the Conference of the Parties approved Decision 15/9, which calls for the establishment of a mechanism to include DSI in the international ABS regime. This decision led to the creation of a Working Group on Benefit-sharing from the use of DSI (WGDSI). This paper aims to critically analyze the multilateral benefit-sharing modalities recommended by the WGDSI and those proposed by Decision 16/2 at COP-16. The work also proposes a new solution to improve the mechanism's ability to raise funds for biodiversity conservation.

Abstract Image

分析工作组的建议和缔约方会议-16关于数字序列信息的第16/2号决定
分子生物学和生物信息学的最新进展为获取遗传信息提供了创新的方法,这些方法尚未包含在《生物多样性公约》和《名古屋议定书》的现有框架中。利用数字序列信息的技术通常通过依赖通过私人和公共数据库数字化存储的遗传数据来消除对物理样本的需要。《生物多样性公约》和《名古屋议定书》最初旨在规范获取物质形式的遗传资源。然而,在开发生物技术产品方面越来越依赖DSI,这表明有必要更新国际获取和惠益分享框架。为解决这一问题,第十五届缔约方大会通过了第15/9号决议,呼吁建立将DSI纳入国际ABS体系的机制。这一决定促成了DSI使用惠益分享工作组(WGDSI)的成立。本文旨在批判性地分析WGDSI推荐的多边利益分享模式和COP-16第16/2号决定提出的多边利益分享模式。这项工作还提出了一个新的解决方案,以提高该机制为生物多样性保护筹集资金的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Policy
Global Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
125
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信