Boon or Bane?: The Hybrid Institutional Complex for the Sustainable Development Goals

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Jack Taggart, Benjamin Faude
{"title":"Boon or Bane?: The Hybrid Institutional Complex for the Sustainable Development Goals","authors":"Jack Taggart,&nbsp;Benjamin Faude","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This Special Section marks the tenth anniversary of the United Nations' 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Progress on the latter has been dismal, with only 17% of targets on track. The contributions to this Special Section explore the global governance of the SDGs as a Hybrid Institutional Complex (HIC): a global governance complex characterized by institutional diversity in that it combines formal intergovernmental organizations, informal intergovernmental institutions, public-private partnerships, multistakeholder initiatives, and private transnational institutions. The HIC framework suggests that this institutional diversity can offer governance benefits, such as good substantive fit for addressing complex transboundary SDG challenges and good political fit by including a broad swathe of actors relevant for goal attainment. Yet it also highlights governance risks, including individual institutions assuming governance tasks that they are poorly suited for and powerful actors cherry-picking goals and softer forms of governance that fit their interests. By applying the HIC concept to discrete dimensions of SDG governance and subfields, the contributions examine whether institutional diversity is driving or hindering progress. As we approach the 2030 deadline, they provide insights into the benefits and risks of HIC-based SDG governance, offering reflections on the remaining and post-2030 development agenda.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"16 4","pages":"682-690"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.70084","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.70084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This Special Section marks the tenth anniversary of the United Nations' 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Progress on the latter has been dismal, with only 17% of targets on track. The contributions to this Special Section explore the global governance of the SDGs as a Hybrid Institutional Complex (HIC): a global governance complex characterized by institutional diversity in that it combines formal intergovernmental organizations, informal intergovernmental institutions, public-private partnerships, multistakeholder initiatives, and private transnational institutions. The HIC framework suggests that this institutional diversity can offer governance benefits, such as good substantive fit for addressing complex transboundary SDG challenges and good political fit by including a broad swathe of actors relevant for goal attainment. Yet it also highlights governance risks, including individual institutions assuming governance tasks that they are poorly suited for and powerful actors cherry-picking goals and softer forms of governance that fit their interests. By applying the HIC concept to discrete dimensions of SDG governance and subfields, the contributions examine whether institutional diversity is driving or hindering progress. As we approach the 2030 deadline, they provide insights into the benefits and risks of HIC-based SDG governance, offering reflections on the remaining and post-2030 development agenda.

Abstract Image

恩还是贝恩?:可持续发展目标的混合机构综合体
本专题纪念联合国《2030年议程》和可持续发展目标提出十周年。后者的进展令人沮丧,只有17%的目标在轨道上。本专题部分的文章将可持续发展目标的全球治理作为一种混合制度综合体(HIC)进行探讨:这是一种以制度多样性为特征的全球治理综合体,它结合了正式的政府间组织、非正式的政府间机构、公私伙伴关系、多利益攸关方倡议和私营跨国机构。HIC框架表明,这种制度多样性可以带来治理方面的好处,例如在实质性上适合解决复杂的跨界可持续发展目标挑战,在政治上适合纳入与实现目标相关的广泛行为体。然而,它也凸显了治理风险,包括个别机构承担了它们不适合的治理任务,强大的行为者挑选符合其利益的目标和较软的治理形式。通过将HIC概念应用于可持续发展目标治理的离散维度和子领域,论文研究了制度多样性是推动还是阻碍了进展。随着2030年最后期限的临近,这些报告对基于hicc的可持续发展目标治理的益处和风险提供了深刻见解,并对剩余的和2030年后的发展议程提出了思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Policy
Global Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
125
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信