A. El Shahawy, A. Mohamed, M. El Shafie, S. EL-Shatoury, K. A. A. El-Rahem, R. Wagdy
{"title":"Eco-friendly sustainable biofilters media for UASB effluent post-treatment in agrofood industry wastewater using design of experiments and LCA","authors":"A. El Shahawy, A. Mohamed, M. El Shafie, S. EL-Shatoury, K. A. A. El-Rahem, R. Wagdy","doi":"10.1007/s13762-025-06582-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study evaluates and compares sustainable, low-cost biofilter media, specifically chitosan and <i>Phragmites australis</i> biochar, with commercial activated carbon to remove chemical oxygen demand (COD) and phenol from agro-food industry wastewater. The primary objective is to identify an effective and eco-friendly alternative to conventional adsorbents for the post-treatment of effluents from Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactors. COD and phenol are targeted due to their environmental significance; COD reflects overall organic pollution, while phenol is a toxic, persistent compound in oily industrial wastewater. Multi-level factorial design experiments optimized using three types of adsorbent materials with different doses to improve the Biofilter performance. COD removal and phenol were studied as a function of four experimental parameters: adsorbent materials, dose, contact time, and wastewater type. To minimize the number of experiments, MINITAB Version 19 software conducted the experiments using a multi-level full factorial design, reducing the total number of experimental runs required while still capturing the interactions and effects of the different factors involved. The characterization investigation was carried out using X-ray diffractometry (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET). The optimal conditions achieved a composite desirability of 0.9872, indicating a near-ideal balance for both responses. For COD removal, the maximum rate of 98.3721% was achieved under the optimal conditions with <i>Phragmites australis</i> biochar (Adsorbent Material 2), UASB effluent (Wastewater Type 2), a contact time of 90 min, and a dose of 6.5 g/L, yielding a desirability value of 0.97463. The maximum rate of 86.6766% for phenol removal was also attained under the same optimal conditions, yielding a desirability value of 1.0000, representing perfect optimization for phenol removal. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was conducted to evaluate the environmental impacts associated with the treatment of UASB effluent and Arma wastewater using the three different adsorbent materials. The <i>Phragmites australis</i> biochar offers the most environmentally sustainable option for wastewater treatment. It significantly reduces greenhouse gas emissions, resource depletion, toxicity impacts, and energy use compared to Activated Carbon and Chitosan. This research is consistent with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), namely SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation) and SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production). Our findings have far-reaching implications for large-scale wastewater treatment, offering a greener and more sustainable future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":589,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","volume":"22 15","pages":"15479 - 15508"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13762-025-06582-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13762-025-06582-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluates and compares sustainable, low-cost biofilter media, specifically chitosan and Phragmites australis biochar, with commercial activated carbon to remove chemical oxygen demand (COD) and phenol from agro-food industry wastewater. The primary objective is to identify an effective and eco-friendly alternative to conventional adsorbents for the post-treatment of effluents from Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactors. COD and phenol are targeted due to their environmental significance; COD reflects overall organic pollution, while phenol is a toxic, persistent compound in oily industrial wastewater. Multi-level factorial design experiments optimized using three types of adsorbent materials with different doses to improve the Biofilter performance. COD removal and phenol were studied as a function of four experimental parameters: adsorbent materials, dose, contact time, and wastewater type. To minimize the number of experiments, MINITAB Version 19 software conducted the experiments using a multi-level full factorial design, reducing the total number of experimental runs required while still capturing the interactions and effects of the different factors involved. The characterization investigation was carried out using X-ray diffractometry (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET). The optimal conditions achieved a composite desirability of 0.9872, indicating a near-ideal balance for both responses. For COD removal, the maximum rate of 98.3721% was achieved under the optimal conditions with Phragmites australis biochar (Adsorbent Material 2), UASB effluent (Wastewater Type 2), a contact time of 90 min, and a dose of 6.5 g/L, yielding a desirability value of 0.97463. The maximum rate of 86.6766% for phenol removal was also attained under the same optimal conditions, yielding a desirability value of 1.0000, representing perfect optimization for phenol removal. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was conducted to evaluate the environmental impacts associated with the treatment of UASB effluent and Arma wastewater using the three different adsorbent materials. The Phragmites australis biochar offers the most environmentally sustainable option for wastewater treatment. It significantly reduces greenhouse gas emissions, resource depletion, toxicity impacts, and energy use compared to Activated Carbon and Chitosan. This research is consistent with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), namely SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation) and SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production). Our findings have far-reaching implications for large-scale wastewater treatment, offering a greener and more sustainable future.
本研究评价和比较了可持续、低成本的生物过滤介质,特别是壳聚糖和芦苇生物炭,与商业活性炭去除农业食品工业废水中的化学需氧量(COD)和苯酚。主要目标是确定一种有效和环保的替代传统吸附剂,用于上流式厌氧污泥毯(UASB)反应器出水的后处理。COD和苯酚因其环境意义而成为目标;COD反映了整体的有机污染,而苯酚是含油工业废水中一种有毒的持久性化合物。采用三种不同剂量的吸附剂对生物滤池的性能进行了优化设计。研究了吸附材料、投加量、接触时间和废水类型对COD去除率和苯酚去除率的影响。为了尽量减少实验次数,MINITAB Version 19软件使用多级全因子设计进行实验,减少了所需的实验运行总数,同时仍然捕获了所涉及的不同因素的相互作用和影响。采用x射线衍射(XRD)、扫描电镜(SEM)、傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)和布鲁诺尔-埃米特-泰勒(BET)等方法进行表征。最佳条件达到0.9872的综合期望,表明两种反应接近理想的平衡。以芦苇生物炭(吸附材料2)、UASB出水(废水类型2)、接触时间为90 min、投加量为6.5 g/L为最佳条件,COD去除率为98.3721%,理想值为0.97463。在相同的优化条件下,苯酚的最大去除率为86.6766%,理想值为1.0000,为苯酚的最佳脱除。通过生命周期评价(LCA)来评价使用三种不同的吸附材料处理UASB废水和Arma废水对环境的影响。芦苇生物炭为废水处理提供了最环保的可持续选择。与活性炭和壳聚糖相比,它显著减少了温室气体排放、资源消耗、毒性影响和能源使用。这项研究符合联合国可持续发展目标(SDG),即可持续发展目标6(清洁水和卫生设施)和可持续发展目标12(负责任的消费和生产)。我们的研究结果对大规模废水处理具有深远的意义,提供了一个更绿色、更可持续的未来。
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (IJEST) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of environmental science and technology, innovation, engineering and management.
A broad outline of the journal''s scope includes: peer reviewed original research articles, case and technical reports, reviews and analyses papers, short communications and notes to the editor, in interdisciplinary information on the practice and status of research in environmental science and technology, both natural and man made.
The main aspects of research areas include, but are not exclusive to; environmental chemistry and biology, environments pollution control and abatement technology, transport and fate of pollutants in the environment, concentrations and dispersion of wastes in air, water, and soil, point and non-point sources pollution, heavy metals and organic compounds in the environment, atmospheric pollutants and trace gases, solid and hazardous waste management; soil biodegradation and bioremediation of contaminated sites; environmental impact assessment, industrial ecology, ecological and human risk assessment; improved energy management and auditing efficiency and environmental standards and criteria.