Evaluating Implementation Context to Prepare for Scaling-Up the Integration of Interdisciplinary Healthcare Providers in Rheumatology Practices: A Rheumatology Workforce Survey.

Jessica Widdifield,Celia Laur,Timothy S H Kwok,Laura Oliva,C Thomas Appleton,Vandana Ahluwalia,J Carter Thorne,Nicolas S Bodmer,Molly J Gomes,Jenna C Wong,Jennifer Ji Young Lee,Claire E H Barber,Laura Passalent,Lauren K King
{"title":"Evaluating Implementation Context to Prepare for Scaling-Up the Integration of Interdisciplinary Healthcare Providers in Rheumatology Practices: A Rheumatology Workforce Survey.","authors":"Jessica Widdifield,Celia Laur,Timothy S H Kwok,Laura Oliva,C Thomas Appleton,Vandana Ahluwalia,J Carter Thorne,Nicolas S Bodmer,Molly J Gomes,Jenna C Wong,Jennifer Ji Young Lee,Claire E H Barber,Laura Passalent,Lauren K King","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nInterdisciplinary healthcare providers (IHPs) can support effective delivery of optimal rheumatology care. To inform widespread implementation efforts, we assessed rheumatology workforce characteristics and determinants of integrating of IHPs within rheumatology practices in Ontario, Canada.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA convergent mixed methods design included an environmental scan to identify clinically active rheumatologists and a workforce survey guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 2.0. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and stratified by subgroups. Qualitative responses were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Integration of findings enabled a comprehensive understanding of implementation determinants.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf the 293 Ontario rheumatologists identified by the environmental scan (as of 2025), 26 were nearing retirement, leaving approximately 267 eligible for the survey. 197 rheumatologists participated in the survey, yielding a response rate of 74%, and coverage of >90% of practice sites. Pediatric rheumatologists and those in hospital-based settings had more structural and collaborative supports than community-based rheumatologists. Overall, 177 (91%) indicated they were interested in adding IHPs, with 126 (65%) preferring an Extended Role/Scope Provider. While inadequate funding was the key deterrent to adoption, motivational readiness was high: 92% perceived an IHP team-based model as an improvement, 85% saw it as a good fit, and 83% considered it a priority to better meet patient needs. Many noted a lack of supportive climate, including lack of support, processes, and resources to enable this practice change.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nRheumatologists report high motivation for practice change to integrate IHPs. System-level and practice-level implementation strategies are needed to support workforce transformation.","PeriodicalId":501812,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Rheumatology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2025-0683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Interdisciplinary healthcare providers (IHPs) can support effective delivery of optimal rheumatology care. To inform widespread implementation efforts, we assessed rheumatology workforce characteristics and determinants of integrating of IHPs within rheumatology practices in Ontario, Canada. METHODS A convergent mixed methods design included an environmental scan to identify clinically active rheumatologists and a workforce survey guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 2.0. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and stratified by subgroups. Qualitative responses were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Integration of findings enabled a comprehensive understanding of implementation determinants. RESULTS Of the 293 Ontario rheumatologists identified by the environmental scan (as of 2025), 26 were nearing retirement, leaving approximately 267 eligible for the survey. 197 rheumatologists participated in the survey, yielding a response rate of 74%, and coverage of >90% of practice sites. Pediatric rheumatologists and those in hospital-based settings had more structural and collaborative supports than community-based rheumatologists. Overall, 177 (91%) indicated they were interested in adding IHPs, with 126 (65%) preferring an Extended Role/Scope Provider. While inadequate funding was the key deterrent to adoption, motivational readiness was high: 92% perceived an IHP team-based model as an improvement, 85% saw it as a good fit, and 83% considered it a priority to better meet patient needs. Many noted a lack of supportive climate, including lack of support, processes, and resources to enable this practice change. CONCLUSION Rheumatologists report high motivation for practice change to integrate IHPs. System-level and practice-level implementation strategies are needed to support workforce transformation.
评估实施环境,准备在风湿病实践中扩大跨学科医疗保健提供者的整合:风湿病劳动力调查。
目的:跨学科医疗服务提供者(IHPs)可以支持最佳风湿病护理的有效提供。为了向广泛的实施工作提供信息,我们评估了加拿大安大略省风湿病学工作人员的特征和将ihp整合到风湿病学实践中的决定因素。方法融合混合方法设计包括环境扫描,以确定临床活跃的风湿病学家,并在实施研究统一框架2.0指导下进行劳动力调查。定量数据进行描述性分析,并按亚组分层。定性反应分析采用常规的内容分析。综合调查结果使我们能够全面了解执行决定因素。结果:在环境扫描确定的293名安大略省风湿病学家中(截至2025年),26名接近退休,剩下约267名符合调查条件。197名风湿病学家参与了调查,回复率为74%,覆盖率为90%。与社区风湿病学家相比,儿科风湿病学家和以医院为基础的风湿病学家有更多的结构性和协作性支持。总体而言,177(91%)表示他们有兴趣增加ihp, 126(65%)更喜欢扩展角色/范围提供者。虽然资金不足是采用的主要障碍,但动机准备程度很高:92%的人认为基于团队的IHP模式是一种改进,85%的人认为它非常适合,83%的人认为它是更好地满足患者需求的优先事项。许多人注意到缺乏支持性的环境,包括缺乏支持、流程和资源来实现这种实践的改变。结论风湿病学家报告说,他们有很高的动机改变实践,整合ihp。需要系统级和实践级的实施策略来支持劳动力转换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信