Fission-Fusion Group Dynamics and Cooperative Hunting Stabilise Social Carnivore Populations

IF 7.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Letters Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1111/ele.70211
J. M. Fryxell, S. Mduma, J. Masoy, J. Grant C. Hopcraft, A. R. E. Sinclair, R. Dejeante, C. Packer
{"title":"Fission-Fusion Group Dynamics and Cooperative Hunting Stabilise Social Carnivore Populations","authors":"J. M. Fryxell,&nbsp;S. Mduma,&nbsp;J. Masoy,&nbsp;J. Grant C. Hopcraft,&nbsp;A. R. E. Sinclair,&nbsp;R. Dejeante,&nbsp;C. Packer","doi":"10.1111/ele.70211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Theory suggests that large social groups of carnivores should be unsustainable, due to reduced foraging efficiency because of overlapping perception radii. Using Serengeti lions as a case study, we apply behaviourally based foraging models to show that fragmentation of social groups into smaller subgroups or mutual cooperation during hunting are both plausible hypothetical mechanisms capable of sustaining larger lion prides. Data from the Serengeti ecosystem demonstrate that lion prides typically fragment into small hunting groups that are well approximated by an exponential distribution of group sizes typical of fission-fusion social systems. A model linking fission-fusion group dynamics with predator–prey interaction predicts both the surprising degree of population stability of the Serengeti lions as well as the long-term persistence of large prides. There is little evidence, however, that Serengeti lions cooperate during hunting except when they hunt Cape buffalo, so fission-fusion is apparently the dominant stabilising process in Serengeti.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"28 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.70211","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70211","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Theory suggests that large social groups of carnivores should be unsustainable, due to reduced foraging efficiency because of overlapping perception radii. Using Serengeti lions as a case study, we apply behaviourally based foraging models to show that fragmentation of social groups into smaller subgroups or mutual cooperation during hunting are both plausible hypothetical mechanisms capable of sustaining larger lion prides. Data from the Serengeti ecosystem demonstrate that lion prides typically fragment into small hunting groups that are well approximated by an exponential distribution of group sizes typical of fission-fusion social systems. A model linking fission-fusion group dynamics with predator–prey interaction predicts both the surprising degree of population stability of the Serengeti lions as well as the long-term persistence of large prides. There is little evidence, however, that Serengeti lions cooperate during hunting except when they hunt Cape buffalo, so fission-fusion is apparently the dominant stabilising process in Serengeti.

Abstract Image

裂变-融合群体动态和合作狩猎稳定了群居食肉动物种群。
理论表明,大型食肉动物社会群体应该是不可持续的,因为重叠的感知半径降低了觅食效率。以塞伦盖蒂狮子为例,我们应用基于行为的觅食模型来表明,社会群体分裂成更小的子群体或在狩猎过程中相互合作都是能够维持更大狮子群的合理假设机制。来自塞伦盖蒂生态系统的数据表明,狮群通常会分裂成小的狩猎群体,这与分裂融合社会系统中典型的群体规模指数分布非常接近。一个将分裂-融合群体动力学与捕食者-猎物相互作用联系起来的模型,既预测了塞伦盖蒂狮惊人的种群稳定性,也预测了大型狮群的长期持久性。然而,几乎没有证据表明塞伦盖蒂狮子在捕猎过程中会合作,除了捕猎南非水牛的时候,所以裂变融合显然是塞伦盖蒂主要的稳定过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology Letters
Ecology Letters 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
201
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信