A-404 Evaluating the need for head CT in mild TBI patients using a whole blood point-of-care test within 24 hours of suspected head injury

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
James Smith, Swati Pradhan-Bhatt, Erica Wyse, Raj Chandran, Ksenia Musaelyan, Brandon Gentile, Paula Bernander, Jaime Marino, Susan Brophy, Manish Gupta, Beth McQuiston, Adam Moss
{"title":"A-404 Evaluating the need for head CT in mild TBI patients using a whole blood point-of-care test within 24 hours of suspected head injury","authors":"James Smith, Swati Pradhan-Bhatt, Erica Wyse, Raj Chandran, Ksenia Musaelyan, Brandon Gentile, Paula Bernander, Jaime Marino, Susan Brophy, Manish Gupta, Beth McQuiston, Adam Moss","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Approximately 69 million people worldwide experience a traumatic brain injury (TBI) annually. In the Emergency Department, over 80% of patients evaluated for TBI undergo head CT scans, but fewer than 10% of these scans reveal acute traumatic abnormalities. This highlights the need for objective, rapid, and accurate tools to help clinicians evaluate patients with suspected TBI, significantly improving patient care by reducing unnecessary radiation exposure, minimizing wait times, and optimizing resource utilization. The i-STAT® TBI test represents a significant advancement in TBI diagnostics. This point-of-care test measures two key brain injury biomarkers, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1). Its recent regulatory clearance for clinical use with venous whole blood enhances its utility and accessibility in various environments, including bedside use. This study demonstrates the analytical and clinical performance of the whole blood TBI test. Methods The i-STAT TBI test is a panel of in vitro diagnostic immunoassays for the quantitative measurements of GFAP and UCH-L1 in 20 µL of venous whole blood. Performance characteristics such as detection limits, imprecision, linearity, measuring interval, and potential interference due to drugs of abuse were established following CLSI guidance. Clinical performance was evaluated in a prospective study across 20 U.S. sites. The study enrolled 970 adult patients with suspected mild TBI who presented with initial GCS scores of 13-15 within 24 hours of injury and had a head CT scan ordered as part of standard care. Results The reportable range of the GFAP assay extended from 47 pg/mL to 10,000 pg/mL. For UCH-L1, the range extended from 87 pg/mL to 3,200 pg/mL. Within-laboratory imprecision ranged from 3.98% to 24.62% CV for GFAP and 4.81% to 11.64% CV for UCH-L1. The linearity of GFAP and UCH-L1 assays was established using venous whole blood samples of varying antigen levels. Deviations from linearity were =15% for GFAP and =10% for UCH-L1. Additionally, drugs of abuse were tested and no interference was observed with TBI assays at concentrations up to 2.25 times the highest therapeutic drug concentration. In the clinical performance study, 283 had positive CT imaging showing acute traumatic intracranial lesions, while 687 had negative scans (no acute trauma-related findings). The TBI test correctly identified 273 of the 283 CT-positive patients as “Elevated,” resulting in a clinical sensitivity of 96.5%. All patients requiring neurosurgical intervention were classified as “Elevated.” Among the 687 patients with negative CT scans, 277 were identified as “Not Elevated,” reflecting a specificity of 40.3%. These metrics translated into an overall negative predictive value of 96.5%, indicating that most patients testing “Not Elevated” had no lesions on head CT. Conclusion The i-STAT TBI test allows for expanded utility and easier accessibility of TBI biomarkers for bedside evaluation. This test demonstrated high clinical performance in ruling out intracranial lesions visible on CT imaging in adult mild TBI patients seen within 24 hours of trauma. The TBI test provides an objective tool to reduce unnecessary neuroimaging in mild TBI cases and potentially alleviate the associated resource and radiation burdens.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.388","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Approximately 69 million people worldwide experience a traumatic brain injury (TBI) annually. In the Emergency Department, over 80% of patients evaluated for TBI undergo head CT scans, but fewer than 10% of these scans reveal acute traumatic abnormalities. This highlights the need for objective, rapid, and accurate tools to help clinicians evaluate patients with suspected TBI, significantly improving patient care by reducing unnecessary radiation exposure, minimizing wait times, and optimizing resource utilization. The i-STAT® TBI test represents a significant advancement in TBI diagnostics. This point-of-care test measures two key brain injury biomarkers, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1). Its recent regulatory clearance for clinical use with venous whole blood enhances its utility and accessibility in various environments, including bedside use. This study demonstrates the analytical and clinical performance of the whole blood TBI test. Methods The i-STAT TBI test is a panel of in vitro diagnostic immunoassays for the quantitative measurements of GFAP and UCH-L1 in 20 µL of venous whole blood. Performance characteristics such as detection limits, imprecision, linearity, measuring interval, and potential interference due to drugs of abuse were established following CLSI guidance. Clinical performance was evaluated in a prospective study across 20 U.S. sites. The study enrolled 970 adult patients with suspected mild TBI who presented with initial GCS scores of 13-15 within 24 hours of injury and had a head CT scan ordered as part of standard care. Results The reportable range of the GFAP assay extended from 47 pg/mL to 10,000 pg/mL. For UCH-L1, the range extended from 87 pg/mL to 3,200 pg/mL. Within-laboratory imprecision ranged from 3.98% to 24.62% CV for GFAP and 4.81% to 11.64% CV for UCH-L1. The linearity of GFAP and UCH-L1 assays was established using venous whole blood samples of varying antigen levels. Deviations from linearity were =15% for GFAP and =10% for UCH-L1. Additionally, drugs of abuse were tested and no interference was observed with TBI assays at concentrations up to 2.25 times the highest therapeutic drug concentration. In the clinical performance study, 283 had positive CT imaging showing acute traumatic intracranial lesions, while 687 had negative scans (no acute trauma-related findings). The TBI test correctly identified 273 of the 283 CT-positive patients as “Elevated,” resulting in a clinical sensitivity of 96.5%. All patients requiring neurosurgical intervention were classified as “Elevated.” Among the 687 patients with negative CT scans, 277 were identified as “Not Elevated,” reflecting a specificity of 40.3%. These metrics translated into an overall negative predictive value of 96.5%, indicating that most patients testing “Not Elevated” had no lesions on head CT. Conclusion The i-STAT TBI test allows for expanded utility and easier accessibility of TBI biomarkers for bedside evaluation. This test demonstrated high clinical performance in ruling out intracranial lesions visible on CT imaging in adult mild TBI patients seen within 24 hours of trauma. The TBI test provides an objective tool to reduce unnecessary neuroimaging in mild TBI cases and potentially alleviate the associated resource and radiation burdens.
a -404评估轻度TBI患者在疑似颅脑损伤后24小时内使用全血即时检测进行头部CT检查的必要性
全世界每年大约有6900万人经历创伤性脑损伤(TBI)。在急诊科,超过80%的TBI患者接受头部CT扫描,但只有不到10%的扫描显示急性创伤性异常。这突出了客观、快速和准确的工具的需求,以帮助临床医生评估疑似TBI患者,通过减少不必要的辐射暴露、最小化等待时间和优化资源利用来显着改善患者护理。i-STAT®TBI测试代表了TBI诊断的重大进步。这种即时测试测量了两个关键的脑损伤生物标志物,胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)和泛素羧基末端水解酶L1 (UCH-L1)。它最近被批准用于静脉全血的临床使用,增强了它在各种环境中的实用性和可及性,包括床边使用。本研究证明了全血TBI试验的分析和临床性能。方法i-STAT TBI试验是一组体外诊断免疫分析法,用于定量测定20µL静脉全血中GFAP和UCH-L1的含量。性能特征,如检出限、不精度、线性、测量间隔和药物滥用的潜在干扰是根据CLSI指南建立的。临床表现在一项横跨美国20个地点的前瞻性研究中进行评估。该研究招募了970名疑似轻度TBI的成年患者,他们在受伤24小时内的初始GCS评分为13-15,并将头部CT扫描作为标准治疗的一部分。结果GFAP检测的报告范围从47 pg/mL扩大到10000 pg/mL。对于UCH-L1,范围从87 pg/mL到3200 pg/mL。GFAP和UCH-L1的实验室内不精确CV分别为3.98% ~ 24.62%和4.81% ~ 11.64%。采用不同抗原水平的静脉全血样本,建立GFAP和UCH-L1检测的线性关系。GFAP和UCH-L1的线性偏差分别为=15%和=10%。此外,对滥用药物进行了测试,在最高治疗药物浓度高达2.25倍的浓度下,TBI试验没有观察到干扰。在临床表现研究中,283例CT阳性显示急性创伤性颅内病变,687例CT阴性(无急性创伤相关发现)。TBI测试正确识别283例ct阳性患者中的273例为“升高”,临床敏感性为96.5%。所有需要神经外科干预的患者都被归类为“升高”。在687例CT扫描阴性的患者中,277例被确定为“未升高”,反映了40.3%的特异性。这些指标转化为96.5%的总体阴性预测值,表明大多数检测为“未升高”的患者在头部CT上没有病变。结论i-STAT TBI试验扩大了TBI生物标志物在床边评估中的实用性和可及性。该测试在排除成人轻度TBI患者创伤后24小时内CT成像可见的颅内病变方面表现出很高的临床性能。TBI测试提供了一种客观的工具,可以减少轻度TBI病例中不必要的神经影像学检查,并可能减轻相关的资源和辐射负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信