Electrocardiogram heart rate variability for machine learning diagnosis of obstructive sleep Apnoea: A bayesian meta-analysis.

IF 2
Yunrui Hao, Nicole Kye Wen Tan, Esther Yanxin Gao, Joy Xin Yi Au, Novelle En Xian Toh, Cai Ling Yong, Yao Hao Teo, Adele Chin Wei Ng, Zhou Hao Leong, Chu Qin Phua, Thun How Ong, Leong Chai Leow, Guang-Bin Huang, Benjamin Kye Jyn Tan, Song Tar Toh
{"title":"Electrocardiogram heart rate variability for machine learning diagnosis of obstructive sleep Apnoea: A bayesian meta-analysis.","authors":"Yunrui Hao, Nicole Kye Wen Tan, Esther Yanxin Gao, Joy Xin Yi Au, Novelle En Xian Toh, Cai Ling Yong, Yao Hao Teo, Adele Chin Wei Ng, Zhou Hao Leong, Chu Qin Phua, Thun How Ong, Leong Chai Leow, Guang-Bin Huang, Benjamin Kye Jyn Tan, Song Tar Toh","doi":"10.1007/s11325-025-03476-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSA) is a common yet underdiagnosed condition associated with significant health risks. Although polysomnography is the diagnostic gold standard, it is resource-intensive and unsuitable for widespread screening. Heart rate variability (HRV) derived from electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings has emerged as a promising, accessible alternative for OSA detection. Recent developments in machine learning have enabled automated HRV analysis, potentially offering a scalable screening tool for OSA. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning-based models trained on HRV for detecting OSA in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore (up to 20 October 2024) for eligible studies that assessed the accuracy of OSA diagnosis using AI models trained on HRV, compared to the apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI). Bayesian bivariate random-effects meta-analysis estimated pooled sensitivity and specificity. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2, and GRADE was used to rate evidence certainty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies with 2,019 participants met inclusion criteria. Pooled sensitivity was 79.0% (95% CrI: 74.9%-82.7%) and specificity was 75.0% (95% CrI: 67.9%-82.3%). The diagnostic odds ratio was 11.3 (95% CrI: 7.21-19.0%). Meta-regression showed specificity varied with demographic factors, while model architecture and validation methods had no significant impact. No publication bias was detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning models trained on HRV show good diagnostic accuracy for OSA, with higher specificity than STOP-BANG and comparable performance to home sleep tests. Their scalability and potential integration into wearable devices offer a practical, cost-effective screening option. Further real-world validation is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":520777,"journal":{"name":"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung","volume":"29 5","pages":"303"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-025-03476-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSA) is a common yet underdiagnosed condition associated with significant health risks. Although polysomnography is the diagnostic gold standard, it is resource-intensive and unsuitable for widespread screening. Heart rate variability (HRV) derived from electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings has emerged as a promising, accessible alternative for OSA detection. Recent developments in machine learning have enabled automated HRV analysis, potentially offering a scalable screening tool for OSA. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning-based models trained on HRV for detecting OSA in adults.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore (up to 20 October 2024) for eligible studies that assessed the accuracy of OSA diagnosis using AI models trained on HRV, compared to the apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI). Bayesian bivariate random-effects meta-analysis estimated pooled sensitivity and specificity. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2, and GRADE was used to rate evidence certainty.

Results: Nine studies with 2,019 participants met inclusion criteria. Pooled sensitivity was 79.0% (95% CrI: 74.9%-82.7%) and specificity was 75.0% (95% CrI: 67.9%-82.3%). The diagnostic odds ratio was 11.3 (95% CrI: 7.21-19.0%). Meta-regression showed specificity varied with demographic factors, while model architecture and validation methods had no significant impact. No publication bias was detected.

Conclusions: Machine learning models trained on HRV show good diagnostic accuracy for OSA, with higher specificity than STOP-BANG and comparable performance to home sleep tests. Their scalability and potential integration into wearable devices offer a practical, cost-effective screening option. Further real-world validation is warranted.

心电图心率变异性用于阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的机器学习诊断:贝叶斯荟萃分析。
目的:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSA)是一种常见但诊断不足的疾病,具有重大的健康风险。虽然多导睡眠图是诊断的金标准,但它是资源密集型的,不适合广泛筛查。从心电图(ECG)记录中得出的心率变异性(HRV)已成为一种有前途的、可获得的OSA检测替代方法。机器学习的最新发展使HRV分析自动化成为可能,可能为OSA提供可扩展的筛选工具。本研究旨在评估基于HRV训练的机器学习模型诊断成人OSA的准确性。方法:我们检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science和IEEE explore(截至2024年10月20日),以评估使用HRV训练的AI模型与呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)相比诊断OSA准确性的符合条件的研究。贝叶斯双变量随机效应荟萃分析估计了合并敏感性和特异性。使用QUADAS-2评估偏倚风险,使用GRADE评价证据确定性。结果:9项研究,2019名受试者符合纳入标准。合并敏感性为79.0% (95% CrI: 74.9% ~ 82.7%),特异性为75.0% (95% CrI: 67.9% ~ 82.3%)。诊断优势比为11.3 (95% CrI: 7.21-19.0%)。meta回归显示,特异性随人口统计学因素而变化,而模型结构和验证方法无显著影响。未发现发表偏倚。结论:HRV训练的机器学习模型对OSA的诊断准确性较好,特异性高于STOP-BANG,性能与家庭睡眠测试相当。它们的可扩展性和与可穿戴设备的潜在集成提供了一种实用且具有成本效益的筛查选择。进一步的实际验证是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信