Metacognitive Awareness of Lipreading Gains in Young and Older Adults.

IF 2.2
Elena Giovanelli, Benedetta Desolda, Chiara Valzolgher, Elena Gessa, Tommaso Rosi, Francesco Pavani
{"title":"Metacognitive Awareness of Lipreading Gains in Young and Older Adults.","authors":"Elena Giovanelli, Benedetta Desolda, Chiara Valzolgher, Elena Gessa, Tommaso Rosi, Francesco Pavani","doi":"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>When listening to speech in noise, lipreading can facilitate communication. However, beyond its objective benefits, individuals' perceptions of lipreading advantages may influence their motivation to use it in daily interactions. We investigated to what extent older and younger adults are metacognitively aware of lipreading benefits, focusing not only on performance improvements but also on changes in confidence and listening effort and on the internal evaluations (confidence and effort) that shape listening experiences and may influence strategy adoption.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Forty participants completed a hearing-in-noise task in virtual reality, facing a human-like avatar behind a translucent panel that varied in transparency to create pairs of conditions with different lip visibility. We measured audiovisual performance, confidence, and effort, deriving both real improvements (i.e., lipreading gain) and metacognitive improvements (i.e., perceived changes in accuracy, confidence, and effort) on a trial-by-trial basis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both age groups experienced comparable real improvements from lipreading and were similarly aware of its benefits for accuracy and confidence. Yet, older adults were less sensitive to the reduction of listening effort associated with higher lip visibility, particularly those with lower unisensory lipreading abilities (as measured in a visual-only condition).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While younger and older adults share similar awareness of lipreading benefits in speech perception, reduced sensitivity to effort reduction may impact older adults' motivation to use lipreading in everyday communication. Given the role of perceived effort in strategy adoption, these findings highlight the importance of addressing effort perceptions in interventions aimed at improving communication in aging populations.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30179404.</p>","PeriodicalId":520690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","volume":" ","pages":"4720-4735"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: When listening to speech in noise, lipreading can facilitate communication. However, beyond its objective benefits, individuals' perceptions of lipreading advantages may influence their motivation to use it in daily interactions. We investigated to what extent older and younger adults are metacognitively aware of lipreading benefits, focusing not only on performance improvements but also on changes in confidence and listening effort and on the internal evaluations (confidence and effort) that shape listening experiences and may influence strategy adoption.

Method: Forty participants completed a hearing-in-noise task in virtual reality, facing a human-like avatar behind a translucent panel that varied in transparency to create pairs of conditions with different lip visibility. We measured audiovisual performance, confidence, and effort, deriving both real improvements (i.e., lipreading gain) and metacognitive improvements (i.e., perceived changes in accuracy, confidence, and effort) on a trial-by-trial basis.

Results: Both age groups experienced comparable real improvements from lipreading and were similarly aware of its benefits for accuracy and confidence. Yet, older adults were less sensitive to the reduction of listening effort associated with higher lip visibility, particularly those with lower unisensory lipreading abilities (as measured in a visual-only condition).

Conclusions: While younger and older adults share similar awareness of lipreading benefits in speech perception, reduced sensitivity to effort reduction may impact older adults' motivation to use lipreading in everyday communication. Given the role of perceived effort in strategy adoption, these findings highlight the importance of addressing effort perceptions in interventions aimed at improving communication in aging populations.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30179404.

青年和老年人唇读增益的元认知意识。
目的:在嘈杂环境中听讲话时,读唇有助于交流。然而,除了它的客观好处之外,个体对唇读优势的感知可能会影响他们在日常交往中使用唇读的动机。我们调查了老年人和年轻人在多大程度上对唇读的好处有元认知意识,不仅关注表现的提高,还关注信心和听力努力的变化,以及塑造听力体验并可能影响策略采用的内部评估(信心和努力)。方法:40名参与者在虚拟现实中完成了一项噪音听力任务,他们面对一个半透明面板后的人形化身,该面板的透明度不同,以创造不同嘴唇可见度的条件对。我们测量了视听表现、信心和努力程度,在一次又一次的试验基础上得出了实际的改善(即唇读增益)和元认知的改善(即在准确性、信心和努力方面的感知变化)。结果:两个年龄组的人都从唇读中获得了相当的实际改善,并且同样意识到唇读对准确性和自信心的好处。然而,老年人对高嘴唇可见度导致的听力努力减少不太敏感,尤其是那些无感觉读唇能力较低的人(在仅视觉条件下测量)。结论:虽然年轻人和老年人对唇读在言语感知方面的好处有着相似的认识,但对努力减少的敏感性降低可能会影响老年人在日常交流中使用唇读的动机。考虑到感知努力在策略采用中的作用,这些发现强调了在旨在改善老龄化人口沟通的干预措施中解决感知努力的重要性。补充资料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30179404。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信