Concordance between upper and lower airway microbiota in children with cystic fibrosis.

IF 2
Sedreh Nassirnia, Valentin Scherz, Gilbert Greub, Giorgia Caruana, Patrick Taffé, Katia Jaton, Sebastien Papis, Klara M Posfay-Barbe, Anne Mornand, Isabelle Rochat-Guignard, Claire Bertelli, Sandra A Asner
{"title":"Concordance between upper and lower airway microbiota in children with cystic fibrosis.","authors":"Sedreh Nassirnia, Valentin Scherz, Gilbert Greub, Giorgia Caruana, Patrick Taffé, Katia Jaton, Sebastien Papis, Klara M Posfay-Barbe, Anne Mornand, Isabelle Rochat-Guignard, Claire Bertelli, Sandra A Asner","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.002079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Sputum is the most used sample type to monitor the lower respiratory tract microbiota in cystic fibrosis (CF), but young patients often cannot expectorate.<b>Hypothesis.</b> We hypothesized that throat swabs could reflect lower airway colonization and assessed the concordance of bacterial community composition between paired sputum and throat swab samples from children with CF.<b>Aim.</b> We aimed to compare bacterial community diversity and composition between sputum and throat swabs in the full cohort and in patients with paired samples from the same visit.<b>Methodology.</b> The prospective longitudinal multicentre MUCOVIB cohort included 379 samples from 61 CF children. Using V3-V4 16S rRNA amplicon metagenomics, we compared bacterial community diversity and composition between sputum and throat swabs in the full cohort and in 11 patients with paired samples from the same visit.<b>Results.</b> Sputum and throat swabs exhibited similar bacterial diversity, regardless of the exacerbation status, and presented a substantial agreement for detecting pathogens (Cohen's kappa: 0.6). Differences in bacterial abundance were observed (<i>P</i>=0.001), but not presence/absence (<i>P</i>=0.098). Community typing revealed three distinct community types, with 86% of paired samples falling into the same cluster, highlighting the homogeneity between sputum and throat swab microbiota. Network analysis demonstrated slight, non-random similarities in microbial interactions between sample types (adjusted Rand index=0.08 and 0.10). The average beta-diversity distances between samples collected from the same visit were shorter (0.505±0.056 95% confidence interval), compared with sputum (0.695±0.017) or throat swab (0.704±0.045) from the same patient collected during different visits.<b>Conclusion.</b> Throat swabs can provide representative information on lower respiratory microbiota. Clinicians should collect throat swabs rather than relying on sputum samples from previous visits to guide antibiotic prescriptions in CF children unable to expectorate.</p>","PeriodicalId":94093,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":"74 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.002079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Sputum is the most used sample type to monitor the lower respiratory tract microbiota in cystic fibrosis (CF), but young patients often cannot expectorate.Hypothesis. We hypothesized that throat swabs could reflect lower airway colonization and assessed the concordance of bacterial community composition between paired sputum and throat swab samples from children with CF.Aim. We aimed to compare bacterial community diversity and composition between sputum and throat swabs in the full cohort and in patients with paired samples from the same visit.Methodology. The prospective longitudinal multicentre MUCOVIB cohort included 379 samples from 61 CF children. Using V3-V4 16S rRNA amplicon metagenomics, we compared bacterial community diversity and composition between sputum and throat swabs in the full cohort and in 11 patients with paired samples from the same visit.Results. Sputum and throat swabs exhibited similar bacterial diversity, regardless of the exacerbation status, and presented a substantial agreement for detecting pathogens (Cohen's kappa: 0.6). Differences in bacterial abundance were observed (P=0.001), but not presence/absence (P=0.098). Community typing revealed three distinct community types, with 86% of paired samples falling into the same cluster, highlighting the homogeneity between sputum and throat swab microbiota. Network analysis demonstrated slight, non-random similarities in microbial interactions between sample types (adjusted Rand index=0.08 and 0.10). The average beta-diversity distances between samples collected from the same visit were shorter (0.505±0.056 95% confidence interval), compared with sputum (0.695±0.017) or throat swab (0.704±0.045) from the same patient collected during different visits.Conclusion. Throat swabs can provide representative information on lower respiratory microbiota. Clinicians should collect throat swabs rather than relying on sputum samples from previous visits to guide antibiotic prescriptions in CF children unable to expectorate.

囊性纤维化患儿上、下气道微生物群的一致性。
介绍。痰是监测囊性纤维化(CF)患者下呼吸道微生物群最常用的样本类型,但年轻患者往往不能咳痰。我们假设咽拭子可以反映下气道定植,并评估配对的cf儿童痰和咽拭子样本之间细菌群落组成的一致性。我们的目的是比较整个队列和来自同一次访问的配对样本的患者的痰和咽拭子之间的细菌群落多样性和组成。前瞻性纵向多中心MUCOVIB队列包括来自61名CF儿童的379个样本。使用V3-V4 16S rRNA扩增子宏基因组学,我们比较了整个队列的痰和咽拭子之间的细菌群落多样性和组成,以及来自同一次就诊的11例患者的配对样本。痰液和咽拭子表现出相似的细菌多样性,无论恶化状态如何,并且在检测病原体方面表现出实质性的一致(Cohen的kappa: 0.6)。观察到细菌丰度差异(P=0.001),但没有存在/不存在差异(P=0.098)。群落分型显示出三种不同的群落类型,86%的配对样本属于同一群,突出了痰和咽拭子微生物群之间的同质性。网络分析表明,样品类型之间的微生物相互作用存在轻微的非随机相似性(调整后的Rand指数=0.08和0.10)。与同一患者不同访诊期间痰液(0.695±0.017)或咽拭子(0.704±0.045)相比,同一患者同一访诊期间采集样本之间的平均β多样性距离(0.505±0.056)较短(95%置信区间为0.505±0.056)。咽拭子可提供有关下呼吸道微生物群的代表性信息。临床医生应该收集咽拭子,而不是依靠以前就诊的痰样本来指导不能咳痰的CF儿童的抗生素处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信