Strategies for Sustaining Emergency Care in the United States.

Rand health quarterly Pub Date : 2025-09-29 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01
Mahshid Abir, Brian Briscombe, Carl T Berdahl, Kirstin W Scott, Sydney Cortner, Daniel Wang, Rose Kerber, Wilson Nham
{"title":"Strategies for Sustaining Emergency Care in the United States.","authors":"Mahshid Abir, Brian Briscombe, Carl T Berdahl, Kirstin W Scott, Sydney Cortner, Daniel Wang, Rose Kerber, Wilson Nham","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past decade, much has changed in the emergency care landscape in the United States. Hospital-based emergency departments (EDs) and the health care professionals who provide care in them have been at the forefront of responding to the opioid and gun violence epidemics and the coronavirus pandemic, with reported increases in patient acuity and complexity. During the same time frame, there have been unsustainable declines in payment for emergency care, putting the viability of EDs at risk. The authors (1) assess the current value of emergency care, (2) evaluate challenges to sustaining emergency care, (3) measure trends in emergency care payment, and (4) identify alternate funding strategies for emergency care. To achieve these objectives, they sought expert input in the form of a study advisory board and conducted interviews and focus groups, a survey, case studies, an environmental scan of peer-reviewed and gray literature, and analysis of administrative data. The authors find that EDs offer many types of value to various stakeholders in the United States but that, because of the stresses EDs have faced over the past decade, the viability of emergency care as we know it is at risk. The authors offer policy actions that need to be taken on multiple fronts to preserve emergency care.</p>","PeriodicalId":74637,"journal":{"name":"Rand health quarterly","volume":"12 4","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rand health quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past decade, much has changed in the emergency care landscape in the United States. Hospital-based emergency departments (EDs) and the health care professionals who provide care in them have been at the forefront of responding to the opioid and gun violence epidemics and the coronavirus pandemic, with reported increases in patient acuity and complexity. During the same time frame, there have been unsustainable declines in payment for emergency care, putting the viability of EDs at risk. The authors (1) assess the current value of emergency care, (2) evaluate challenges to sustaining emergency care, (3) measure trends in emergency care payment, and (4) identify alternate funding strategies for emergency care. To achieve these objectives, they sought expert input in the form of a study advisory board and conducted interviews and focus groups, a survey, case studies, an environmental scan of peer-reviewed and gray literature, and analysis of administrative data. The authors find that EDs offer many types of value to various stakeholders in the United States but that, because of the stresses EDs have faced over the past decade, the viability of emergency care as we know it is at risk. The authors offer policy actions that need to be taken on multiple fronts to preserve emergency care.

在美国维持紧急护理的策略。
在过去的十年里,美国的急诊护理情况发生了很大的变化。医院急诊科(EDs)和在其中提供护理的卫生保健专业人员一直站在应对阿片类药物和枪支暴力流行病以及冠状病毒大流行的最前沿,据报道,患者的敏锐度和复杂性都有所增加。在同一时间段内,急诊费用出现了不可持续的下降,危及急诊科的生存。作者(1)评估急诊护理的当前价值,(2)评估维持急诊护理的挑战,(3)衡量急诊护理支付的趋势,以及(4)确定急诊护理的替代资金策略。为了实现这些目标,他们以研究顾问委员会的形式寻求专家意见,并进行了访谈和焦点小组、调查、案例研究、对同行评议文献和灰色文献进行环境扫描,以及对行政数据进行分析。作者发现,急诊科为美国的各种利益相关者提供了多种类型的价值,但由于急诊科在过去十年中面临的压力,我们所知道的急诊护理的可行性面临风险。作者提供了需要在多个方面采取的政策行动,以保持紧急护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信