Neural alcohol cue reactivity as a risk factor for future drinking in youth with limited alcohol exposure.

IF 2.7 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Kathryn C Jenkins, Shiane Toleson, Alexa House, Kayla Kreutzer, K Luan Phan, Stephanie M Gorka
{"title":"Neural alcohol cue reactivity as a risk factor for future drinking in youth with limited alcohol exposure.","authors":"Kathryn C Jenkins, Shiane Toleson, Alexa House, Kayla Kreutzer, K Luan Phan, Stephanie M Gorka","doi":"10.1111/acer.70152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heightened alcohol cue reactivity is associated with alcohol problems and poor alcohol use disorder outcomes. Theory suggests that this reflects a conditioned response, whereby cues repeatedly paired with chronic alcohol use become more salient. However, few studies have investigated the relative emergence of heightened alcohol cue reactivity. It is possible that this response occurs very early in individual drinking trajectories and may play a role in shaping future alcohol use behavior.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We tested this hypothesis in a sample of youth (n = 159; ages 16-19) with limited lifetime alcohol exposure (<100 lifetime drinks). Participants completed a baseline cue reactivity task in which they viewed images of alcoholic beverages, high-calorie foods (reward control), and neutral objects. The late positive potential (LPP), measured using electroencephalography, is a positive-going event-related potential measured 400 ms after a visual cue. The LPP was used to index cue reactivity and scored as the average amplitude from parietal site Pz. At baseline and 12 months, participants completed a retrospective calendar of alcohol use. Participants were classified into groups based on lifetime alcohol exposure: (1) ≤ 10 drinks (n = 50), (2) ≤50 drinks (n = 74), (3) >50 drinks (n = 35).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We ran a repeated measures analysis of variance to compare the effects of task condition (alcohol cues/food cues > neutral) and drink groups on LPP amplitude. Our results revealed a significant condition × drink group interaction. Follow-up analyses revealed that, for alcohol cues only, there was a significant group effect. The highest drink exposure group exhibited greater LPP relative only to the low drink exposure group. Next, we examined whether baseline LPP to alcohol cues predicted total drinks consumed 12 months later, while controlling for baseline drinking behavior. Greater LPP to alcohol cues was associated with an increase in drinks consumed at one year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Heightened alcohol cue reactivity emerges with limited alcohol use and can be predictive of future drinking behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.70152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heightened alcohol cue reactivity is associated with alcohol problems and poor alcohol use disorder outcomes. Theory suggests that this reflects a conditioned response, whereby cues repeatedly paired with chronic alcohol use become more salient. However, few studies have investigated the relative emergence of heightened alcohol cue reactivity. It is possible that this response occurs very early in individual drinking trajectories and may play a role in shaping future alcohol use behavior.

Methods: We tested this hypothesis in a sample of youth (n = 159; ages 16-19) with limited lifetime alcohol exposure (<100 lifetime drinks). Participants completed a baseline cue reactivity task in which they viewed images of alcoholic beverages, high-calorie foods (reward control), and neutral objects. The late positive potential (LPP), measured using electroencephalography, is a positive-going event-related potential measured 400 ms after a visual cue. The LPP was used to index cue reactivity and scored as the average amplitude from parietal site Pz. At baseline and 12 months, participants completed a retrospective calendar of alcohol use. Participants were classified into groups based on lifetime alcohol exposure: (1) ≤ 10 drinks (n = 50), (2) ≤50 drinks (n = 74), (3) >50 drinks (n = 35).

Results: We ran a repeated measures analysis of variance to compare the effects of task condition (alcohol cues/food cues > neutral) and drink groups on LPP amplitude. Our results revealed a significant condition × drink group interaction. Follow-up analyses revealed that, for alcohol cues only, there was a significant group effect. The highest drink exposure group exhibited greater LPP relative only to the low drink exposure group. Next, we examined whether baseline LPP to alcohol cues predicted total drinks consumed 12 months later, while controlling for baseline drinking behavior. Greater LPP to alcohol cues was associated with an increase in drinks consumed at one year.

Conclusions: Heightened alcohol cue reactivity emerges with limited alcohol use and can be predictive of future drinking behaviors.

神经酒精线索反应是酒精接触有限的青少年未来饮酒的危险因素。
背景:升高的酒精线索反应与酒精问题和不良的酒精使用障碍结局有关。理论表明,这反映了一种条件反应,即与长期饮酒反复配对的线索变得更加突出。然而,很少有研究调查了酒精线索反应性升高的相对出现。这种反应很可能发生在个人饮酒轨迹的早期,并可能在塑造未来的饮酒行为中发挥作用。方法:我们在终生酒精暴露有限(50次饮酒(n = 35)的青年样本(n = 159;年龄16-19)中检验了这一假设。结果:我们进行了重复测量方差分析来比较任务条件(酒精线索/食物线索>中性)和饮料组对LPP振幅的影响。我们的结果揭示了一个显著的条件x饮料组相互作用。后续分析显示,仅就酒精线索而言,存在显著的群体效应。最高饮酒量组仅比低饮酒量组表现出更大的LPP。接下来,我们检查了基线LPP对酒精线索的预测是否能预测12个月后的总饮酒量,同时控制了基线饮酒行为。对酒精线索的LPP越大,一年内的饮酒量就会增加。结论:酒精提示反应的增强与有限的酒精使用有关,可以预测未来的饮酒行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信