Resident Physician Burnout in the Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective, Mixed-Methods Study.

IF 1.9 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Hitesh H Patel, Jean-Luc Banks, Arianna Michaels, Bex Forcier, Kenton Dover, Rimma Osipov, Christina Orantes, Emma Thompson, R Jean Cadigan, Arlene M Davis, Kunal P Patel
{"title":"Resident Physician Burnout in the Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective, Mixed-Methods Study.","authors":"Hitesh H Patel, Jean-Luc Banks, Arianna Michaels, Bex Forcier, Kenton Dover, Rimma Osipov, Christina Orantes, Emma Thompson, R Jean Cadigan, Arlene M Davis, Kunal P Patel","doi":"10.34197/ats-scholar.2025-0008OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Burnout, characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a reduced sense of personal accomplishment, negatively affects resident physicians and patients. Although burnout is common among intensive care unit (ICU) healthcare workers, data on its impact on resident physicians during their medical ICU (MICU) rotations are limited. <b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to determine the prevalence, key drivers, and mitigating factors for burnout among resident physicians rotating through the MICU. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a single-center, mixed-methods prospective cohort study in the MICU of an academic quaternary care hospital. Over the course of a 9-month period, we surveyed residents at the end of their MICU rotation and assessed the prevalence of burnout using the Maslach Burnout Inventory, as well as perceived drivers and mitigators of burnout. Focus groups were conducted to further explore internal medicine (IM) residents' perceptions of drivers and mitigators of MICU-related burnout. <b>Results:</b> Forty-nine residents completed the survey (80% response rate), and 25 IM residents participated in focus groups. The overall burnout prevalence was 88%. Although not statistically significant, higher burnout rates were observed among first-year residents (94% vs. 78%; <i>P</i> = 0.12) and non-IM residents (100% vs. 81%; <i>P</i> = 0.07). Fifty-three percent of residents believed that there was more burnout in the MICU than other ICU rotations. Three themes emerged as drivers of burnout: patient factors (high acuity, adverse outcomes, ethical dilemmas), team and unit dynamics (interdisciplinary tensions, MICU insider-outsider bias), and the clinical learning environment (limited work-life balance, steep learning curve, normalization of burnout). The primary mitigating factors were meaningful patient interactions, supportive team dynamics, structured debriefing, protected time, and focused skill development. <b>Conclusion:</b> Burnout in residents rotating through the MICU is extremely high, higher than the previously reported baseline resident burnout rate of 50-75%. First-year and non-IM residents may be especially vulnerable because of unfamiliarity with the unique team and unit dynamics and clinical learning environment of the MICU (high acuity, high intensity, frequent exposure to dying patients, and unit insider-outsider bias). This study highlights unique factors, which contribute to burnout among MICU residents, that differ from those affecting other critical care staff and could be addressed through targeted interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72330,"journal":{"name":"ATS scholar","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATS scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2025-0008OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Burnout, characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a reduced sense of personal accomplishment, negatively affects resident physicians and patients. Although burnout is common among intensive care unit (ICU) healthcare workers, data on its impact on resident physicians during their medical ICU (MICU) rotations are limited. Objective: This study aimed to determine the prevalence, key drivers, and mitigating factors for burnout among resident physicians rotating through the MICU. Methods: We conducted a single-center, mixed-methods prospective cohort study in the MICU of an academic quaternary care hospital. Over the course of a 9-month period, we surveyed residents at the end of their MICU rotation and assessed the prevalence of burnout using the Maslach Burnout Inventory, as well as perceived drivers and mitigators of burnout. Focus groups were conducted to further explore internal medicine (IM) residents' perceptions of drivers and mitigators of MICU-related burnout. Results: Forty-nine residents completed the survey (80% response rate), and 25 IM residents participated in focus groups. The overall burnout prevalence was 88%. Although not statistically significant, higher burnout rates were observed among first-year residents (94% vs. 78%; P = 0.12) and non-IM residents (100% vs. 81%; P = 0.07). Fifty-three percent of residents believed that there was more burnout in the MICU than other ICU rotations. Three themes emerged as drivers of burnout: patient factors (high acuity, adverse outcomes, ethical dilemmas), team and unit dynamics (interdisciplinary tensions, MICU insider-outsider bias), and the clinical learning environment (limited work-life balance, steep learning curve, normalization of burnout). The primary mitigating factors were meaningful patient interactions, supportive team dynamics, structured debriefing, protected time, and focused skill development. Conclusion: Burnout in residents rotating through the MICU is extremely high, higher than the previously reported baseline resident burnout rate of 50-75%. First-year and non-IM residents may be especially vulnerable because of unfamiliarity with the unique team and unit dynamics and clinical learning environment of the MICU (high acuity, high intensity, frequent exposure to dying patients, and unit insider-outsider bias). This study highlights unique factors, which contribute to burnout among MICU residents, that differ from those affecting other critical care staff and could be addressed through targeted interventions.

重症监护病房住院医师职业倦怠:一项前瞻性、混合方法研究。
背景:职业倦怠以情绪耗竭、人格解体和个人成就感降低为特征,对住院医师和患者产生负面影响。尽管职业倦怠在重症监护病房(ICU)医护人员中很常见,但其对住院医师在重症监护病房(MICU)轮转期间的影响的数据有限。目的:本研究旨在确定在MICU轮转的住院医师中职业倦怠的患病率、主要驱动因素和缓解因素。方法:我们在一家学术四级护理医院的MICU进行了一项单中心、混合方法的前瞻性队列研究。在为期9个月的时间里,我们在MICU轮换结束时对居民进行了调查,并使用Maslach倦怠量表评估了倦怠的患病率,以及倦怠的驱动因素和缓解因素。通过焦点小组研究,进一步探讨内科(IM)住院医师对micu相关职业倦怠的驱动因素和缓解因素的看法。结果:49名居民完成调查,回复率80%,25名IM居民参与焦点小组。总体倦怠率为88%。虽然没有统计学意义,但第一年住院医生(94%对78%,P = 0.12)和非住院医生(100%对81%,P = 0.07)的倦怠率较高。53%的住院医生认为,MICU比其他ICU轮转有更多的倦怠。倦怠的驱动因素有三个:患者因素(高灵敏度、不良结果、道德困境)、团队和单位动态(跨学科紧张、MICU内外偏见)和临床学习环境(有限的工作与生活平衡、陡峭的学习曲线、倦怠的正常化)。主要的缓解因素是有意义的患者互动、支持性的团队动态、结构化的汇报、保护时间和集中的技能发展。结论:在MICU轮转的住院医师的职业倦怠非常高,高于先前报道的住院医师职业倦怠基线率50-75%。由于不熟悉MICU独特的团队和单位动态以及临床学习环境(高灵敏度、高强度、频繁接触垂死病人以及单位内外偏见),第一年和非im住院医师可能特别容易受到伤害。本研究强调了导致MICU居民倦怠的独特因素,这些因素与影响其他重症护理人员的因素不同,可以通过有针对性的干预措施加以解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信