A randomized trial showing mnemonic strategy training increases memory, brain activation, and functional connectivity more than vanishing cue training in cognitively intact older adults.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Benjamin M Hampstead, Alexandru D Iordan, Robert Ploutz-Snyder, Bidisha Ghosh, Ashley Harrie, Anthony Y Stringer, K Sathian
{"title":"A randomized trial showing mnemonic strategy training increases memory, brain activation, and functional connectivity more than vanishing cue training in cognitively intact older adults.","authors":"Benjamin M Hampstead, Alexandru D Iordan, Robert Ploutz-Snyder, Bidisha Ghosh, Ashley Harrie, Anthony Y Stringer, K Sathian","doi":"10.1080/09602011.2025.2525349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This single-blind, parallel groups, randomized controlled trial examined whether (1) mnemonic strategy training (MST) improved memory for face-name associations relative to vanishing cue training (VCT) and (2) the interventions modulated blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal in a training-specific manner.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomized 30 cognitively intact older adults to either MST or VCT (1:1 basis). Memory for face-name associations (primary outcome) was evaluated at baseline and post-training using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and again at 1-month follow-up (memory test only). During training sessions, MST participants applied a 3-step strategy while those receiving VCT recalled the targeted name across trials with letters subtracted (correct trials) or added (incorrect trials) as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no adverse events and excellent retention. The magnitude of memory test improvement was significantly greater after MST at both post-training and 1-month relative to VCT. The MST group also showed significantly greater BOLD signal changes in multiple brain regions as well as increased functional connectivity between networks relative to the VCT group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MST is superior to VCT for enhancing long-term retention of face-name associations in cognitively intact older adults and appears to enhance use of lateral frontoparietal regions and networks involved in top-down processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":54729,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2025.2525349","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This single-blind, parallel groups, randomized controlled trial examined whether (1) mnemonic strategy training (MST) improved memory for face-name associations relative to vanishing cue training (VCT) and (2) the interventions modulated blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal in a training-specific manner.

Methods: We randomized 30 cognitively intact older adults to either MST or VCT (1:1 basis). Memory for face-name associations (primary outcome) was evaluated at baseline and post-training using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and again at 1-month follow-up (memory test only). During training sessions, MST participants applied a 3-step strategy while those receiving VCT recalled the targeted name across trials with letters subtracted (correct trials) or added (incorrect trials) as appropriate.

Results: There were no adverse events and excellent retention. The magnitude of memory test improvement was significantly greater after MST at both post-training and 1-month relative to VCT. The MST group also showed significantly greater BOLD signal changes in multiple brain regions as well as increased functional connectivity between networks relative to the VCT group.

Conclusions: MST is superior to VCT for enhancing long-term retention of face-name associations in cognitively intact older adults and appears to enhance use of lateral frontoparietal regions and networks involved in top-down processing.

一项随机试验显示,在认知完整的老年人中,记忆策略训练比消失线索训练更能提高记忆力、大脑激活和功能连接。
目的:本单盲、平行组、随机对照试验研究了(1)相对于消失提示训练(VCT),助记策略训练(MST)是否改善了面孔-名字关联记忆;(2)干预是否以特定训练方式调节血氧水平依赖(BOLD)信号。方法:我们随机选择30名认知完整的老年人进行MST或VCT(1:1为基础)。使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)在基线和训练后评估面孔-名字联想记忆(主要结果),并在1个月的随访中再次评估(仅记忆测试)。在训练过程中,MST参与者采用三步策略,而那些接受VCT的参与者则在不同的试验中适当地减去(正确的试验)或增加(错误的试验)字母来回忆目标名字。结果:无不良反应,保留性好。与VCT相比,MST在训练后和1个月的记忆测试改善幅度均显著增加。与VCT组相比,MST组在多个脑区也显示出明显更大的BOLD信号变化,以及网络之间功能连接的增加。结论:在认知完整的老年人中,MST在增强面孔-名字关联的长期保留方面优于VCT,并且似乎增强了参与自上而下加工的侧额顶叶区域和网络的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation publishes human experimental and clinical research related to rehabilitation, recovery of function, and brain plasticity. The journal is aimed at clinicians who wish to inform their practice in the light of the latest scientific research; at researchers in neurorehabilitation; and finally at researchers in cognitive neuroscience and related fields interested in the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation. Papers on neuropsychological assessment will be considered, and special topic reviews (2500-5000 words) addressing specific key questions in rehabilitation, recovery and brain plasticity will also be welcomed. The latter will enter a fast-track refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信