Solving Raven's Matrices While Walking on a Treadmill: Insights into Cognitive-Motor Interference Patterns in Dual-Task.

IF 1.2 4区心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES

Journal of Motor Behavior Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1080/00222895.2025.2566195

Frédéric Dierick, Fabien Buisseret, Thomas Hoho, Alexandre Fiévet, Adele Mae Luta

{"title":"Solving Raven's Matrices While Walking on a Treadmill: Insights into Cognitive-Motor Interference Patterns in Dual-Task.","authors":"Frédéric Dierick, Fabien Buisseret, Thomas Hoho, Alexandre Fiévet, Adele Mae Luta","doi":"10.1080/00222895.2025.2566195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates cognitive-motor interference by combining Raven's Progressive Matrices Test (RPMT) with treadmill walking. Two groups of healthy adults-20 young adults (born after 1995) familiar with treadmill walking and 18 older adults (born before 1980) without treadmill experience-completed both single-task and dual-task conditions. Cognitive performance (RPMT score) and gait metrics (stride interval variability and sample entropy) were recorded. Results revealed diverse interference patterns, with a predominance of gait-prioritization strategies under dual-task conditions. Significant differences between groups were found: younger adults showed greater cognitive performance decline, while older adults increased stride interval under dual-task conditions. A negative correlation between gait variability and complexity suggested adaptive motor strategies in some participants. This dual-task paradigm offers a standardized framework to explore both individual and group variability in multitasking performance. These insights may inform the design of safer environments and interventions targeting populations with different cognitive-motor profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":50125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2025.2566195","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates cognitive-motor interference by combining Raven's Progressive Matrices Test (RPMT) with treadmill walking. Two groups of healthy adults-20 young adults (born after 1995) familiar with treadmill walking and 18 older adults (born before 1980) without treadmill experience-completed both single-task and dual-task conditions. Cognitive performance (RPMT score) and gait metrics (stride interval variability and sample entropy) were recorded. Results revealed diverse interference patterns, with a predominance of gait-prioritization strategies under dual-task conditions. Significant differences between groups were found: younger adults showed greater cognitive performance decline, while older adults increased stride interval under dual-task conditions. A negative correlation between gait variability and complexity suggested adaptive motor strategies in some participants. This dual-task paradigm offers a standardized framework to explore both individual and group variability in multitasking performance. These insights may inform the design of safer environments and interventions targeting populations with different cognitive-motor profiles.

查看原文本刊更多论文

在跑步机上行走时解决雷文矩阵：对双重任务中认知-运动干扰模式的见解。

本研究通过联合瑞文进行性矩阵测验（RPMT）研究认知运动干扰。两组健康成年人——20名熟悉跑步机行走的年轻人（1995年以后出生）和18名没有跑步机经验的老年人（1980年以前出生）——完成了单任务和双任务条件。记录认知表现（RPMT评分）和步态指标（步幅间隔变异性和样本熵）。结果表明，在双任务条件下，步态优先策略占主导地位。两组之间存在显著差异：在双任务条件下，年轻人表现出更大的认知能力下降，而老年人则增加了步幅间隔。步态变异性和复杂性之间的负相关表明一些参与者的适应性运动策略。这种双任务范式提供了一个标准化的框架来探索多任务性能中的个人和群体可变性。这些见解可以为设计更安全的环境和针对不同认知运动特征人群的干预措施提供信息。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Motor Behavior 医学-神经科学

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.