Variants in CALD1, ESRP1, and RBFOX1 are associated with orofacial cleft risk.

IF 3.7 2区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
PLoS Genetics Pub Date : 2025-09-30 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.1011581
Jenna C Carlson, Xinyi Zhang, Zeynep Erdogan-Yildirim, Terri H Beaty, Azeez Butali, Carmen J Buxó, Lord J J Gowans, Jacqueline T Hecht, Ross E Long, Lina Moreno, Jeffrey C Murray, Ieda M Orioli, Carmencita Padilla, George L Wehby, Eleanor Feingold, Elizabeth J Leslie-Clarkson, Seth M Weinberg, Mary L Marazita, John R Shaffer
{"title":"Variants in CALD1, ESRP1, and RBFOX1 are associated with orofacial cleft risk.","authors":"Jenna C Carlson, Xinyi Zhang, Zeynep Erdogan-Yildirim, Terri H Beaty, Azeez Butali, Carmen J Buxó, Lord J J Gowans, Jacqueline T Hecht, Ross E Long, Lina Moreno, Jeffrey C Murray, Ieda M Orioli, Carmencita Padilla, George L Wehby, Eleanor Feingold, Elizabeth J Leslie-Clarkson, Seth M Weinberg, Mary L Marazita, John R Shaffer","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgen.1011581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nonsyndromic orofacial clefts (OFCs) are common, heritable birth defects caused by both genetic and environmental risk factors. Despite the identification of many genetic loci harboring OFC-risk variants, there are many unknown genetic determinants of OFC. Furthermore, while the process of embryonic facial development is well characterized, the molecular mechanisms that underly it are not. This represents a major hurdle in understanding how disruptions in these biological processes result in OFC. Thus, we sought to identify novel OFC-risk loci through a genome-wide multi-ancestry study of five nested OFC phenotypes (isolated cleft lip [CLO], isolated cleft palate [CPO], cleft lip and palate [CLP], cleft lip with/without cleft palate [CL/P], and any cleft [ANY]) representing distinct cleft subtypes to identify subtype-specific signals and grouped types to maximize power to detect shared genetic effects. We performed genome-wide meta-analyses of these five OFC phenotypes from three cohorts totaling >14,000 individuals using METAL. In addition to replicating 13 known OFC-risk loci, we observed novel association in three regions: the 1p36.32 locus (lead variant rs584402, an intergenic variant, pCLO = 3.14e-8), the 7q33 locus (lead variant rs17168118, an intronic variant in CALD1, pCLP = 9.17e-9), and the 16p13.3 locus (lead variant rs77075754, an intronic variant in RBFOX1, pCL/P = 1.53e-9, pANY = 1.93e-9). We also observed a novel association within the known risk locus 8q22.1 that was independent of the previously reported signal (lead variant rs4735314, an intronic variant in ESRP1, pCLP = 1.07e-9, pCL/P = 3.88e-8). Next, we performed multi-tissue TWAS with s-MulTiXcan and identified four overlapping genes with significant genetically predicted transcription associated with OFC risk. These genes also overlapped the genome-wide significant association signals from the meta-analysis, including CALD1 and ESRP1 and known OFC-risk genes TANC2 and NTN1. Each of the newly reported loci has potential regulatory effects, including evidence of craniofacial enhancer activity, that offer new clues as to the molecule mechanisms underlying embryonic facial development.</p>","PeriodicalId":49007,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Genetics","volume":"21 9","pages":"e1011581"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011581","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nonsyndromic orofacial clefts (OFCs) are common, heritable birth defects caused by both genetic and environmental risk factors. Despite the identification of many genetic loci harboring OFC-risk variants, there are many unknown genetic determinants of OFC. Furthermore, while the process of embryonic facial development is well characterized, the molecular mechanisms that underly it are not. This represents a major hurdle in understanding how disruptions in these biological processes result in OFC. Thus, we sought to identify novel OFC-risk loci through a genome-wide multi-ancestry study of five nested OFC phenotypes (isolated cleft lip [CLO], isolated cleft palate [CPO], cleft lip and palate [CLP], cleft lip with/without cleft palate [CL/P], and any cleft [ANY]) representing distinct cleft subtypes to identify subtype-specific signals and grouped types to maximize power to detect shared genetic effects. We performed genome-wide meta-analyses of these five OFC phenotypes from three cohorts totaling >14,000 individuals using METAL. In addition to replicating 13 known OFC-risk loci, we observed novel association in three regions: the 1p36.32 locus (lead variant rs584402, an intergenic variant, pCLO = 3.14e-8), the 7q33 locus (lead variant rs17168118, an intronic variant in CALD1, pCLP = 9.17e-9), and the 16p13.3 locus (lead variant rs77075754, an intronic variant in RBFOX1, pCL/P = 1.53e-9, pANY = 1.93e-9). We also observed a novel association within the known risk locus 8q22.1 that was independent of the previously reported signal (lead variant rs4735314, an intronic variant in ESRP1, pCLP = 1.07e-9, pCL/P = 3.88e-8). Next, we performed multi-tissue TWAS with s-MulTiXcan and identified four overlapping genes with significant genetically predicted transcription associated with OFC risk. These genes also overlapped the genome-wide significant association signals from the meta-analysis, including CALD1 and ESRP1 and known OFC-risk genes TANC2 and NTN1. Each of the newly reported loci has potential regulatory effects, including evidence of craniofacial enhancer activity, that offer new clues as to the molecule mechanisms underlying embryonic facial development.

CALD1、ESRP1和RBFOX1的变异与唇腭裂风险相关。
非综合征性口面裂(OFCs)是一种常见的遗传性出生缺陷,由遗传和环境风险因素引起。尽管已经发现了许多含有OFC风险变异的基因位点,但仍有许多未知的OFC遗传决定因素。此外,虽然胚胎面部发育的过程已被很好地描述,但其背后的分子机制尚不清楚。这代表了理解这些生物过程的中断如何导致OFC的主要障碍。因此,我们试图通过对5种巢式OFC表型(孤立性唇裂[CLO]、孤立性腭裂[CPO]、唇腭裂[CLP]、唇腭裂/不唇裂[CL/P]和任何唇裂[any])的全基因组多祖先研究来鉴定新的OFC风险位点,这些表型代表不同的唇裂亚型,以确定亚型特异性信号和分组类型,以最大限度地检测共享遗传效应。我们使用METAL对来自3个队列共计14000人的这5种OFC表型进行了全基因组荟萃分析。除了复制13个已知的ofc风险位点外,我们还在三个区域观察到新的关联:1p36.32位点(铅变异体rs584402,基因间变异,pCLO = 3.14e-8), 7q33位点(铅变异体rs17168118, CALD1内含子变异,pCLP = 9.17e-9)和16p13.3位点(铅变异体rs77075754, RBFOX1内含子变异,pCL/P = 1.53e-9, pANY = 1.93e-9)。我们还观察到在已知风险位点8q22.1中存在独立于先前报道的信号的新关联(先导变异rs4735314, ESRP1的内含子变异,pCLP = 1.07e-9, pCL/P = 3.88e-8)。接下来,我们使用s-MulTiXcan进行了多组织TWAS,并确定了四个重叠的基因,这些基因的显著遗传预测转录与OFC风险相关。这些基因也与荟萃分析的全基因组显著关联信号重叠,包括CALD1和ESRP1以及已知的ofc风险基因TANC2和NTN1。每一个新报道的基因座都有潜在的调节作用,包括颅面增强活性的证据,为胚胎面部发育的分子机制提供了新的线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Genetics
PLoS Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
自引率
2.20%
发文量
438
期刊介绍: PLOS Genetics is run by an international Editorial Board, headed by the Editors-in-Chief, Greg Barsh (HudsonAlpha Institute of Biotechnology, and Stanford University School of Medicine) and Greg Copenhaver (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). Articles published in PLOS Genetics are archived in PubMed Central and cited in PubMed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信