Meta-evolutionary exome analysis identifies novel type 2 diabetes mellitus genes in the UK Biobank and all of us.

IF 3.7 2区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
PLoS Genetics Pub Date : 2025-09-30 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.1011889
Kevin Wilhelm, Jennifer Asmussen, Kwanghyuk Lee, Maryam Samieinasab, Emmanuel Asante, Marek Kimmel, Olivier Lichtarge
{"title":"Meta-evolutionary exome analysis identifies novel type 2 diabetes mellitus genes in the UK Biobank and all of us.","authors":"Kevin Wilhelm, Jennifer Asmussen, Kwanghyuk Lee, Maryam Samieinasab, Emmanuel Asante, Marek Kimmel, Olivier Lichtarge","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgen.1011889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) risk is heavily influenced by genetics, yet current association tests have explained only parts of its heritability. We developed MEVA (Meta-Evolutionary Action), a meta-analytic framework that integrates three complementary methods-EAML, Sigma-Diff, and GeneEMBED-to assess the functional burden of protein-coding variants using evolutionary data. MEVA was applied to exome data from 28,115 T2DM cases and 28,115 controls in the UK Biobank (UKB), identifying 101 genes (p < 1e-5). MEVA outperformed its component methods, each of which substantially outperformed a conventional burden test (MAGMA), in recovering known T2DM genes (AUROC = 0.925) and maintaining robustness in progressively smaller cohorts (AUROC = 0.917). MEVA showed significant enrichment for T2DM-related loci (p = 6.8e-10, p = 2.0e-34), protein interactions (z = 4.6, z = 4.2), pathways (p = 1.3e-6, z = 2.0), phenotypes (p = 1.3e-21, z = 9.1), and literature mentions (z = 7.2). Replication in 16,915 T2DM cases and 16,915 controls from All of Us (AoU) yielded 99 genes (p < 1e-5), 23 of which were also recovered in the UKB cohort - far exceeding random chance. These included established genes (SLC30A8, WFS1, HNF1A) and less-characterized candidates (NRIP1, ADAM30, CALCOCO2, TUBB1, ZFP36L2, WDR90). Notably, NRIP1 loss-of-function variants were associated with increased T2DM risk in both the UKB (OR = 1.09, FDR = 5.4e-4) and AoU (OR = 1.09, FDR = 0.046), and TUBB1 and CALCOCO2 gain-of-function variants showed consistent risk effects (FDR < 0.05). Pathway analyses revealed convergence on endoplasmic reticulum chaperone complexes (FDR = 0.02) and Hippo signaling (FDR = 8.5e-4). Finally, all 177 candidate genes were functionally prioritized using ten orthogonal criteria to guide experimental follow-up. These results demonstrate that combining complementary, impact-aware association tests increases sensitivity, improves replication, and expands the catalog of genetic risk factors for T2DM.</p>","PeriodicalId":49007,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Genetics","volume":"21 9","pages":"e1011889"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12510657/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011889","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) risk is heavily influenced by genetics, yet current association tests have explained only parts of its heritability. We developed MEVA (Meta-Evolutionary Action), a meta-analytic framework that integrates three complementary methods-EAML, Sigma-Diff, and GeneEMBED-to assess the functional burden of protein-coding variants using evolutionary data. MEVA was applied to exome data from 28,115 T2DM cases and 28,115 controls in the UK Biobank (UKB), identifying 101 genes (p < 1e-5). MEVA outperformed its component methods, each of which substantially outperformed a conventional burden test (MAGMA), in recovering known T2DM genes (AUROC = 0.925) and maintaining robustness in progressively smaller cohorts (AUROC = 0.917). MEVA showed significant enrichment for T2DM-related loci (p = 6.8e-10, p = 2.0e-34), protein interactions (z = 4.6, z = 4.2), pathways (p = 1.3e-6, z = 2.0), phenotypes (p = 1.3e-21, z = 9.1), and literature mentions (z = 7.2). Replication in 16,915 T2DM cases and 16,915 controls from All of Us (AoU) yielded 99 genes (p < 1e-5), 23 of which were also recovered in the UKB cohort - far exceeding random chance. These included established genes (SLC30A8, WFS1, HNF1A) and less-characterized candidates (NRIP1, ADAM30, CALCOCO2, TUBB1, ZFP36L2, WDR90). Notably, NRIP1 loss-of-function variants were associated with increased T2DM risk in both the UKB (OR = 1.09, FDR = 5.4e-4) and AoU (OR = 1.09, FDR = 0.046), and TUBB1 and CALCOCO2 gain-of-function variants showed consistent risk effects (FDR < 0.05). Pathway analyses revealed convergence on endoplasmic reticulum chaperone complexes (FDR = 0.02) and Hippo signaling (FDR = 8.5e-4). Finally, all 177 candidate genes were functionally prioritized using ten orthogonal criteria to guide experimental follow-up. These results demonstrate that combining complementary, impact-aware association tests increases sensitivity, improves replication, and expands the catalog of genetic risk factors for T2DM.

元进化外显子组分析在英国生物银行和我们所有人中发现了新的2型糖尿病基因。
2型糖尿病(T2DM)的风险很大程度上受遗传影响,但目前的关联测试只能解释其部分遗传性。我们开发了MEVA (Meta-Evolutionary Action),这是一个整合了三种互补方法(eaml、Sigma-Diff和geneember)的元分析框架,利用进化数据评估蛋白质编码变异的功能负担。MEVA应用于英国生物银行(UKB)中28,115例T2DM患者和28,115例对照组的外显子组数据,鉴定出101个基因(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Genetics
PLoS Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
自引率
2.20%
发文量
438
期刊介绍: PLOS Genetics is run by an international Editorial Board, headed by the Editors-in-Chief, Greg Barsh (HudsonAlpha Institute of Biotechnology, and Stanford University School of Medicine) and Greg Copenhaver (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). Articles published in PLOS Genetics are archived in PubMed Central and cited in PubMed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信