Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the digital competence questionnaire for nurses.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Arzu Bulut, Reyhan İnce Kasap, Nuray Yılmaz
{"title":"Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the digital competence questionnaire for nurses.","authors":"Arzu Bulut, Reyhan İnce Kasap, Nuray Yılmaz","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-03052-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital competence is crucial for nurses adapting to technological advancements and ensuring effective patient care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Digital Competence Questionnaire (DCQ), thus providing a scientific basis for its study application among Turkish nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional validation study was conducted with 423 registered nurses from two hospitals in the Black Sea region Turkiye using convenience sampling. Two independent samples were collected: 208 participants for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and 215 participants for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The data were collected through online surveys, assessing demographic characteristics, digital competence, attitudes towards digital technology, and affinity for technology interaction. The Turkish version of DCQ was created by translating and revising the original scale, conducting item and factor analysis, and validating it with validation factor analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Turkish version of the DCQ demonstrated a two-factor structure: Knowledge and Skills, and Attitude. EFA and CFA confirmed the scale's construct validity. The CFA model fit indices indicated an excellent fit with the data. Reliability measures were high, with internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Scores on the Turkish version of the DCQ were significantly associated with technology interaction and attitudes toward digital technology. The Turkish DCQ showed robust psychometric properties, aligning with the theoretical framework of digital competence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Turkish adaptation of the DCQ is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing nurses' digital competence. It provides a valuable resource for identifying gaps in digital skills and designing targeted interventions in clinical practice. The tool also supports efforts to enhance digital literacy and integration of digital technologies within nursing education and practice in Turkiye.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"1225"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03052-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Digital competence is crucial for nurses adapting to technological advancements and ensuring effective patient care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Digital Competence Questionnaire (DCQ), thus providing a scientific basis for its study application among Turkish nurses.

Methods: A cross-sectional validation study was conducted with 423 registered nurses from two hospitals in the Black Sea region Turkiye using convenience sampling. Two independent samples were collected: 208 participants for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and 215 participants for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The data were collected through online surveys, assessing demographic characteristics, digital competence, attitudes towards digital technology, and affinity for technology interaction. The Turkish version of DCQ was created by translating and revising the original scale, conducting item and factor analysis, and validating it with validation factor analysis.

Results: The Turkish version of the DCQ demonstrated a two-factor structure: Knowledge and Skills, and Attitude. EFA and CFA confirmed the scale's construct validity. The CFA model fit indices indicated an excellent fit with the data. Reliability measures were high, with internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Scores on the Turkish version of the DCQ were significantly associated with technology interaction and attitudes toward digital technology. The Turkish DCQ showed robust psychometric properties, aligning with the theoretical framework of digital competence.

Conclusions: The Turkish adaptation of the DCQ is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing nurses' digital competence. It provides a valuable resource for identifying gaps in digital skills and designing targeted interventions in clinical practice. The tool also supports efforts to enhance digital literacy and integration of digital technologies within nursing education and practice in Turkiye.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

土耳其版护士数字化能力问卷的信度和效度。
背景:数字能力对于护士适应技术进步和确保有效的患者护理至关重要。本研究旨在评估土耳其版数字能力问卷(DCQ)的信度和效度,为其在土耳其护士中的研究应用提供科学依据。方法:采用方便抽样方法,对土耳其黑海地区两家医院的423名注册护士进行横断面验证研究。收集了两个独立的样本:探索性因子分析(EFA) 208名参与者和验证性因子分析(CFA) 215名参与者。数据通过在线调查收集,评估人口特征、数字能力、对数字技术的态度以及对技术互动的亲和力。土耳其语版的DCQ量表是通过对原量表进行翻译和修订,进行项目分析和因子分析,并通过验证因子分析进行验证而形成的。结果:土耳其版本的DCQ表现出双因素结构:知识和技能,以及态度。EFA和CFA验证了量表的构念效度。CFA模型拟合指数表明与数据拟合良好。信度测量高,具有内部一致性和重测信度。土耳其版本的DCQ得分与技术互动和对数字技术的态度显著相关。土耳其DCQ显示出强大的心理测量特性,与数字能力的理论框架一致。结论:土耳其采用的DCQ是一种有效可靠的评估护士数字化能力的工具。它为识别数字技能差距和在临床实践中设计有针对性的干预措施提供了宝贵的资源。该工具还支持土耳其在护理教育和实践中提高数字素养和整合数字技术的努力。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信