Psychodrama Group Therapy for Excoriation Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial with a Bayesian Analysis.

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Daniel C R Gulassa, Roberta S Amaral, Daniela Lopes Angelo, Elen C Oliveira, Cristiano N de Abreu, Hermano Tavares
{"title":"Psychodrama Group Therapy for Excoriation Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial with a Bayesian Analysis.","authors":"Daniel C R Gulassa, Roberta S Amaral, Daniela Lopes Angelo, Elen C Oliveira, Cristiano N de Abreu, Hermano Tavares","doi":"10.1080/00207284.2025.2551504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Excoriation disorder (ED) involves uncontrollable skin picking, not explained by a dermatologic or other psychological conditions. ED is associated with emotion regulation impairment, psychosocial distress, and psychiatric comorbidities. This study investigated the efficacy of psychodrama group therapy (PGT) in reducing ED symptoms. A randomized controlled trial compared psychodrama group therapy (PGT, n = 26) and support group therapy (SGT, n = 27) as a control. The comparison included ED severity, psychosocial impact, emotion regulation, depression, anxiety, social adjustment, and general clinical status. Bayesian ANOVA models showed improvement in skin excoriation (BF<sub>incl</sub> = 1.15e + 7), emotional regulation (BF<sub>incl</sub> = 258.12), depression (BF<sub>incl</sub> = 89.73), impact of excoriation (BF<sub>incl</sub> = 71.69) and anxiety (BF<sub>incl</sub> = 20.27) over time for both groups. PGT was not more effective than SGT, but group psychotherapy is a valuable treatment option for ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":46441,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Group Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Group Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207284.2025.2551504","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Excoriation disorder (ED) involves uncontrollable skin picking, not explained by a dermatologic or other psychological conditions. ED is associated with emotion regulation impairment, psychosocial distress, and psychiatric comorbidities. This study investigated the efficacy of psychodrama group therapy (PGT) in reducing ED symptoms. A randomized controlled trial compared psychodrama group therapy (PGT, n = 26) and support group therapy (SGT, n = 27) as a control. The comparison included ED severity, psychosocial impact, emotion regulation, depression, anxiety, social adjustment, and general clinical status. Bayesian ANOVA models showed improvement in skin excoriation (BFincl = 1.15e + 7), emotional regulation (BFincl = 258.12), depression (BFincl = 89.73), impact of excoriation (BFincl = 71.69) and anxiety (BFincl = 20.27) over time for both groups. PGT was not more effective than SGT, but group psychotherapy is a valuable treatment option for ED.

心理剧团体治疗擦伤障碍:贝叶斯分析的随机对照试验。
刮伤障碍(ED)是指无法控制的皮肤撕裂,不能用皮肤病学或其他心理疾病来解释。ED与情绪调节障碍、社会心理困扰和精神合并症有关。本研究探讨心理剧团体治疗(PGT)减轻ED症状的效果。一项随机对照试验比较心理剧团体治疗(PGT, n = 26)和支持团体治疗(SGT, n = 27)作为对照。比较包括ED严重程度、心理社会影响、情绪调节、抑郁、焦虑、社会适应和一般临床状况。贝叶斯方差分析模型显示,随着时间的推移,两组的皮肤磨破(BFincl = 1.15e + 7)、情绪调节(BFincl = 258.12)、抑郁(BFincl = 89.73)、磨破的影响(BFincl = 71.69)和焦虑(BFincl = 20.27)均有所改善。PGT并不比SGT更有效,但团体心理治疗是ED的一种有价值的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Recognized as the leading source of information on group therapy theory, practice, and research, this journal features contributions from foremost experts in the field. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy offers: - Clinical articles on group treatment models, process issues, and techniques - Research reviews that keep practitioners up to date - Thought-provoking essays in the Reader"s Forum and Commentary sections - Reviews of current books and video releases - Special issues on such topics as evidence-based practice and ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信