Advance Care Planning in Advanced Heart Failure: The Illusion of Individual Autonomy.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Tieghan Killackey, Elizabeth Peter, Jane Maciver, Shan Mohammed
{"title":"Advance Care Planning in Advanced Heart Failure: The Illusion of Individual Autonomy.","authors":"Tieghan Killackey, Elizabeth Peter, Jane Maciver, Shan Mohammed","doi":"10.1177/10497323251375276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advance care planning involves understanding and sharing values and goals to ensure people with serious illnesses receive treatment that is consistent with their preferences. With the growing treatment options available to patients living with advanced heart failure, advance care planning is regarded as a means of preserving individual autonomy. Despite significant public awareness campaigns, research, and interventions to increase advance care planning, it remains under-utilized in heart failure care. The aim of this research was to gain an understanding of how patients with heart failure understand and express their autonomy through the process of advance care planning. Critical qualitative multiple-case study methodology was used. Cases were constructed using data from 19 interviews with seven patients, eight caregivers, and nine healthcare providers from across two institutions. Constructions of autonomy were developed using within- and across-case analysis guided by a relational conception of autonomy based in feminist ethics. There were three key findings: (1) advance care planning is understood as external to treatment decision-making within the current biomedical landscape; (2) the experience of autonomy in advanced heart failure is incongruent with the dominant individualistic approach; and (3) advance care planning is influenced by interpersonal relationships and responsibilities as well as interpersonal and social power dynamics. Although advance care planning is considered a practice that preserves individual autonomy, interpersonal, institutional, and societal level relationships were all heavily influential in this practice. Future research should consider the advancement of advance care planning, and the enactment of autonomy, using a relational framework that acknowledges autonomy is shaped by institutional, social, and interpersonal relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323251375276"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251375276","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advance care planning involves understanding and sharing values and goals to ensure people with serious illnesses receive treatment that is consistent with their preferences. With the growing treatment options available to patients living with advanced heart failure, advance care planning is regarded as a means of preserving individual autonomy. Despite significant public awareness campaigns, research, and interventions to increase advance care planning, it remains under-utilized in heart failure care. The aim of this research was to gain an understanding of how patients with heart failure understand and express their autonomy through the process of advance care planning. Critical qualitative multiple-case study methodology was used. Cases were constructed using data from 19 interviews with seven patients, eight caregivers, and nine healthcare providers from across two institutions. Constructions of autonomy were developed using within- and across-case analysis guided by a relational conception of autonomy based in feminist ethics. There were three key findings: (1) advance care planning is understood as external to treatment decision-making within the current biomedical landscape; (2) the experience of autonomy in advanced heart failure is incongruent with the dominant individualistic approach; and (3) advance care planning is influenced by interpersonal relationships and responsibilities as well as interpersonal and social power dynamics. Although advance care planning is considered a practice that preserves individual autonomy, interpersonal, institutional, and societal level relationships were all heavily influential in this practice. Future research should consider the advancement of advance care planning, and the enactment of autonomy, using a relational framework that acknowledges autonomy is shaped by institutional, social, and interpersonal relationships.

晚期心力衰竭的预先护理计划:个体自主的幻觉。
预先的护理计划包括理解和分享价值观和目标,以确保患有严重疾病的人得到符合他们偏好的治疗。随着晚期心力衰竭患者的治疗选择越来越多,提前护理计划被视为保留个人自主权的一种手段。尽管有显著的公众意识运动、研究和干预措施来增加预先护理计划,但它在心力衰竭护理中仍未得到充分利用。本研究的目的是了解心力衰竭患者如何通过预先护理计划的过程来理解和表达他们的自主权。采用了关键的定性多案例研究方法。病例的构建使用来自两家机构的7名患者、8名护理人员和9名医疗保健提供者的19次访谈数据。自主性的建构是在基于女性主义伦理学的自主性关系概念的指导下,利用案例内和跨案例分析发展起来的。有三个主要发现:(1)在当前的生物医学景观中,预先护理计划被理解为治疗决策的外部;(2)晚期心力衰竭患者的自主体验与占主导地位的个人主义治疗方法不一致;(3)事前照护计划受人际关系与责任、人际与社会权力动态的影响。虽然预先护理计划被认为是一种保留个人自主权的做法,但人际关系、机构关系和社会层面的关系在这种做法中都有很大的影响。未来的研究应该考虑提前护理计划的进步,以及自主性的制定,使用一个承认自主性是由制度、社会和人际关系形成的关系框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信