Exploring Patient and Caregiver Perceptions of the Facilitators and Barriers to Patient Engagement in Research: Participatory Qualitative Study.

Q2 Medicine
Sasha Melanda Kullman, Louise Bird, Amy Clark, Amanda Doherty-Kirby, Diana Ermel, Nathalie Kinnard, Marion Knutson, Andrew Milroy, Lesley Singer, Anna Maria Chudyk
{"title":"Exploring Patient and Caregiver Perceptions of the Facilitators and Barriers to Patient Engagement in Research: Participatory Qualitative Study.","authors":"Sasha Melanda Kullman, Louise Bird, Amy Clark, Amanda Doherty-Kirby, Diana Ermel, Nathalie Kinnard, Marion Knutson, Andrew Milroy, Lesley Singer, Anna Maria Chudyk","doi":"10.2196/79538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient engagement in research is the meaningful and active involvement of patient and caregiver partners (ie, patients and their family or friends) in research priority-setting, conduct, and governance. With the proper support, patient and caregiver partners can inform every stage of the research cycle, but common barriers often prevent their full engagement.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This participatory qualitative study aimed to answer the question: What are the facilitators and barriers to patient engagement experienced by patient and caregiver partners in a Canadian research context?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were N=13 patient and caregiver partners (median age 62 y, IQR 58-69 y; 11/13, 85% women; 13/13, 100% White) from 4 provinces who completed 60-90-minute semistructured videoconferencing interviews. The interviews were transcribed verbatim. A researcher and a patient partner reviewed the transcripts and curated a dataset of 90 participant quotations representing facilitators and barriers to patient engagement. This dataset was co-analyzed using participatory theme elicitation alongside 7 patient and caregiver partners with diverse identities who were not among the participants we interviewed and, therefore, contributed novel perspectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We generated four themes depicting factors that facilitate meaningful patient engagement alongside barriers that arise when these factors are not in place: (1) Co-defining roles and expectations; (2) demonstrating the value and impact of engagement; (3) psychological safety; and (4) community outreach, training, and education. We then discuss how barriers to enacting these 4 factors can be mitigated and provide a practical checklist of considerations for both researchers and patient and caregiver partners for engaging together throughout the research cycle.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Research teams conducting patient and caregiver engagement activities should draw from our findings to mitigate barriers and facilitate meaningful engagement experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"e79538"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12483476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/79538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient engagement in research is the meaningful and active involvement of patient and caregiver partners (ie, patients and their family or friends) in research priority-setting, conduct, and governance. With the proper support, patient and caregiver partners can inform every stage of the research cycle, but common barriers often prevent their full engagement.

Objective: This participatory qualitative study aimed to answer the question: What are the facilitators and barriers to patient engagement experienced by patient and caregiver partners in a Canadian research context?

Methods: Participants were N=13 patient and caregiver partners (median age 62 y, IQR 58-69 y; 11/13, 85% women; 13/13, 100% White) from 4 provinces who completed 60-90-minute semistructured videoconferencing interviews. The interviews were transcribed verbatim. A researcher and a patient partner reviewed the transcripts and curated a dataset of 90 participant quotations representing facilitators and barriers to patient engagement. This dataset was co-analyzed using participatory theme elicitation alongside 7 patient and caregiver partners with diverse identities who were not among the participants we interviewed and, therefore, contributed novel perspectives.

Results: We generated four themes depicting factors that facilitate meaningful patient engagement alongside barriers that arise when these factors are not in place: (1) Co-defining roles and expectations; (2) demonstrating the value and impact of engagement; (3) psychological safety; and (4) community outreach, training, and education. We then discuss how barriers to enacting these 4 factors can be mitigated and provide a practical checklist of considerations for both researchers and patient and caregiver partners for engaging together throughout the research cycle.

Conclusions: Research teams conducting patient and caregiver engagement activities should draw from our findings to mitigate barriers and facilitate meaningful engagement experiences.

探索患者和护理人员对患者参与研究的促进因素和障碍的看法:参与性质的研究。
背景:患者参与研究是指患者和护理伙伴(即患者及其家人或朋友)在研究重点设置、行为和治理方面有意义和积极的参与。在适当的支持下,患者和护理人员可以了解研究周期的每个阶段,但常见的障碍往往阻碍他们充分参与。目的:本参与性定性研究旨在回答以下问题:在加拿大研究背景下,患者和护理人员合作伙伴对患者参与的促进因素和障碍是什么?方法:参与者为来自4个省的13名患者和护理伙伴(中位年龄62岁,IQR为58-69岁;11/13,85%为女性;13/13,100%为白人),他们完成了60-90分钟的半结构化视频会议访谈。采访是逐字逐句记录下来的。一名研究人员和一名患者合作伙伴审查了这些记录,并整理了一个包含90个参与者语录的数据集,这些语录代表了患者参与的促进因素和障碍。该数据集与7名不同身份的患者和护理人员合作伙伴共同分析,这些合作伙伴不在我们采访的参与者之列,因此提供了新的视角。结果:我们产生了四个主题,描述了促进有意义的患者参与的因素以及当这些因素不到位时产生的障碍:(1)共同定义角色和期望;(2)展示敬业度的价值和影响;(3)心理安全;(4)社区外展、培训和教育。然后,我们讨论了如何减轻制定这4个因素的障碍,并为研究人员、患者和护理人员合作伙伴提供了一个实用的考虑清单,以便在整个研究周期中共同参与。结论:开展患者和护理人员参与活动的研究团队应该借鉴我们的研究结果,以减轻障碍,促进有意义的参与体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Participatory Medicine
Journal of Participatory Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信