iCover as bridging stent graft in complex endovascular aortic repair.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Oana Bartos, Judith Reidt, Oleg Krassilnikov, Dagmar Bachhuber, Matthias Trenner
{"title":"iCover as bridging stent graft in complex endovascular aortic repair.","authors":"Oana Bartos, Judith Reidt, Oleg Krassilnikov, Dagmar Bachhuber, Matthias Trenner","doi":"10.1024/0301-1526/a001239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Bridging Stent Grafts (BSG) are an essential element of fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR and BEVAR respectively). Until CE marking of a dedicated stent in late 2024, a variety of BSG were used. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the iCover stent graft in this application. <i>Patients and methods:</i> We retrospectively analysed 22 consecutive patients treated at our institution with FEVAR and BEVAR between 05/2023 and 09/2024. The primary endpoint is a composite of target vessel (TV) technical success and freedom from target vessel instability (TVI) in the early and short-/mid-term phase. Secondary endpoints consisted of early, short- and mid-term clinical outcomes. <i>Results:</i> Ninety-seven iCover stent grafts were used to bridge 90 target vessels: 23 for the coeliac arteries (CA), 23 for the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and 50 for the renal arteries (RA); one iCover stent could not be implanted. The underlying aortic pathology was juxtarenal and pararenal aneurysm (12/22; 54,5%), penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) (2/22; 9%), type Ia endoleak following infrarenal EVAR (3/22; 13,6%), chronic type B aortic dissection with aneurysmal degeneration (1/22; 4,5%), Safi type IV (3/22; 13.6%) and Safi type V (1/22; 4.5%) thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). The mean aneurysm diameter was 60,5 mm (+/- 10,6 mm). Four (18,2%) patients underwent urgent procedures. The median follow-up was 291,5 days (IQR 63-425,2). 3 patients (13,6%) died from non-aneurysm-related causes. Assisted primary TV technical success was 98,88% (89/90). One non-iCover related loss of TV was excluded from mid-term analysis. The TV patency was 98,88% (89/90) in the early phase and 98,87% (88/89) at mid-term follow-up. Cumulative freedom from TVI was 92,13% (82/89). <i>Conclusions:</i> The iCover is effective and safe to use as a BSG in fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. Our results align with the available literature, but further studies are needed to validate iCover as BGS, especially in BEVAR.</p>","PeriodicalId":23528,"journal":{"name":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001239","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bridging Stent Grafts (BSG) are an essential element of fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR and BEVAR respectively). Until CE marking of a dedicated stent in late 2024, a variety of BSG were used. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the iCover stent graft in this application. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analysed 22 consecutive patients treated at our institution with FEVAR and BEVAR between 05/2023 and 09/2024. The primary endpoint is a composite of target vessel (TV) technical success and freedom from target vessel instability (TVI) in the early and short-/mid-term phase. Secondary endpoints consisted of early, short- and mid-term clinical outcomes. Results: Ninety-seven iCover stent grafts were used to bridge 90 target vessels: 23 for the coeliac arteries (CA), 23 for the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and 50 for the renal arteries (RA); one iCover stent could not be implanted. The underlying aortic pathology was juxtarenal and pararenal aneurysm (12/22; 54,5%), penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) (2/22; 9%), type Ia endoleak following infrarenal EVAR (3/22; 13,6%), chronic type B aortic dissection with aneurysmal degeneration (1/22; 4,5%), Safi type IV (3/22; 13.6%) and Safi type V (1/22; 4.5%) thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). The mean aneurysm diameter was 60,5 mm (+/- 10,6 mm). Four (18,2%) patients underwent urgent procedures. The median follow-up was 291,5 days (IQR 63-425,2). 3 patients (13,6%) died from non-aneurysm-related causes. Assisted primary TV technical success was 98,88% (89/90). One non-iCover related loss of TV was excluded from mid-term analysis. The TV patency was 98,88% (89/90) in the early phase and 98,87% (88/89) at mid-term follow-up. Cumulative freedom from TVI was 92,13% (82/89). Conclusions: The iCover is effective and safe to use as a BSG in fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. Our results align with the available literature, but further studies are needed to validate iCover as BGS, especially in BEVAR.

iCover作为桥接支架在复杂血管内主动脉修复中的应用。
背景:桥式支架移植(BSG)是开窗和分支血管内主动脉修复(分别为FEVAR和BEVAR)的基本组成部分。在2024年底专用支架获得CE认证之前,使用了各种BSG。本研究的目的是评估iCover支架在这种应用中的效果。患者和方法:我们回顾性分析了2023年5月至2024年9月期间在我院接受FEVAR和BEVAR治疗的22例连续患者。主要终点是早期和中短期的靶血管(TV)技术成功和摆脱靶血管不稳定性(TVI)的综合指标。次要终点包括早期、短期和中期临床结果。结果:共使用iCover支架97个,共桥接靶血管90条,其中腹腔动脉23条,肠系膜上动脉23条,肾动脉50条;1例iCover支架不能植入。主动脉基础病理为肾旁和肾旁动脉瘤(12/22;54,5%),穿透性主动脉溃疡(2/22;9%),肾下EVAR后Ia型内漏(3/22;13.6%),慢性B型主动脉夹层伴动脉瘤变性(1/22;4,5%),Safi IV型(3/22;13.6%)和Safi V型(1/22;4.5%)胸腹主动脉瘤(TAAA)。动脉瘤平均直径为60,5 mm(±10,6 mm)。4例(18.2%)患者接受了紧急手术。中位随访时间为291.5天(IQR为63-425,2)。3例患者(13.6%)死于与动脉瘤无关的原因。辅助初级电视技术成功率为98.88%(89/90)。一个与icover无关的电视损失被排除在中期分析之外。早期电视通畅率为98.88%(89/90),中期随访为98.87%(88/89)。TVI的累积自由度为92.13%(82/89)。结论:iCover作为BSG用于开窗主动脉腔内修复是安全有效的。我们的结果与现有文献一致,但需要进一步的研究来验证iCover是否为BGS,特别是在BEVAR中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
61
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Vasa is the European journal of vascular medicine. It is the official organ of the German, Swiss, and Slovenian Societies of Angiology. The journal publishes original research articles, case reports and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for diseases of the arterial circulation, in the field of phlebology and lymphology including the microcirculation, except the cardiac circulation. Vasa combines basic science with clinical medicine making it relevant to all physicians interested in the whole vascular field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信