{"title":"iCover as bridging stent graft in complex endovascular aortic repair.","authors":"Oana Bartos, Judith Reidt, Oleg Krassilnikov, Dagmar Bachhuber, Matthias Trenner","doi":"10.1024/0301-1526/a001239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Bridging Stent Grafts (BSG) are an essential element of fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR and BEVAR respectively). Until CE marking of a dedicated stent in late 2024, a variety of BSG were used. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the iCover stent graft in this application. <i>Patients and methods:</i> We retrospectively analysed 22 consecutive patients treated at our institution with FEVAR and BEVAR between 05/2023 and 09/2024. The primary endpoint is a composite of target vessel (TV) technical success and freedom from target vessel instability (TVI) in the early and short-/mid-term phase. Secondary endpoints consisted of early, short- and mid-term clinical outcomes. <i>Results:</i> Ninety-seven iCover stent grafts were used to bridge 90 target vessels: 23 for the coeliac arteries (CA), 23 for the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and 50 for the renal arteries (RA); one iCover stent could not be implanted. The underlying aortic pathology was juxtarenal and pararenal aneurysm (12/22; 54,5%), penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) (2/22; 9%), type Ia endoleak following infrarenal EVAR (3/22; 13,6%), chronic type B aortic dissection with aneurysmal degeneration (1/22; 4,5%), Safi type IV (3/22; 13.6%) and Safi type V (1/22; 4.5%) thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). The mean aneurysm diameter was 60,5 mm (+/- 10,6 mm). Four (18,2%) patients underwent urgent procedures. The median follow-up was 291,5 days (IQR 63-425,2). 3 patients (13,6%) died from non-aneurysm-related causes. Assisted primary TV technical success was 98,88% (89/90). One non-iCover related loss of TV was excluded from mid-term analysis. The TV patency was 98,88% (89/90) in the early phase and 98,87% (88/89) at mid-term follow-up. Cumulative freedom from TVI was 92,13% (82/89). <i>Conclusions:</i> The iCover is effective and safe to use as a BSG in fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. Our results align with the available literature, but further studies are needed to validate iCover as BGS, especially in BEVAR.</p>","PeriodicalId":23528,"journal":{"name":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001239","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Bridging Stent Grafts (BSG) are an essential element of fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR and BEVAR respectively). Until CE marking of a dedicated stent in late 2024, a variety of BSG were used. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the iCover stent graft in this application. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analysed 22 consecutive patients treated at our institution with FEVAR and BEVAR between 05/2023 and 09/2024. The primary endpoint is a composite of target vessel (TV) technical success and freedom from target vessel instability (TVI) in the early and short-/mid-term phase. Secondary endpoints consisted of early, short- and mid-term clinical outcomes. Results: Ninety-seven iCover stent grafts were used to bridge 90 target vessels: 23 for the coeliac arteries (CA), 23 for the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and 50 for the renal arteries (RA); one iCover stent could not be implanted. The underlying aortic pathology was juxtarenal and pararenal aneurysm (12/22; 54,5%), penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) (2/22; 9%), type Ia endoleak following infrarenal EVAR (3/22; 13,6%), chronic type B aortic dissection with aneurysmal degeneration (1/22; 4,5%), Safi type IV (3/22; 13.6%) and Safi type V (1/22; 4.5%) thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). The mean aneurysm diameter was 60,5 mm (+/- 10,6 mm). Four (18,2%) patients underwent urgent procedures. The median follow-up was 291,5 days (IQR 63-425,2). 3 patients (13,6%) died from non-aneurysm-related causes. Assisted primary TV technical success was 98,88% (89/90). One non-iCover related loss of TV was excluded from mid-term analysis. The TV patency was 98,88% (89/90) in the early phase and 98,87% (88/89) at mid-term follow-up. Cumulative freedom from TVI was 92,13% (82/89). Conclusions: The iCover is effective and safe to use as a BSG in fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. Our results align with the available literature, but further studies are needed to validate iCover as BGS, especially in BEVAR.
期刊介绍:
Vasa is the European journal of vascular medicine. It is the official organ of the German, Swiss, and Slovenian Societies of Angiology.
The journal publishes original research articles, case reports and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for diseases of the arterial circulation, in the field of phlebology and lymphology including the microcirculation, except the cardiac circulation.
Vasa combines basic science with clinical medicine making it relevant to all physicians interested in the whole vascular field.