Is the UDN N-of-1 Enterprise Ethically Justifiable?

Q2 Social Sciences
Gianna Gordon, Lisa Kearns
{"title":"Is the UDN N-of-1 Enterprise Ethically Justifiable?","authors":"Gianna Gordon, Lisa Kearns","doi":"10.1001/amajethics.2025.737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Undiagnosed Diseases Network is a national consortium of clinicians and researchers working to promote diagnostic research and accurately diagnose patients with rare diseases, many of whose conditions have long gone undiagnosed. This endeavor's importance should not, however, stop us from asking good ethics and policy questions about whether and when N-of-1 diagnostic research is justifiable. This article poses and considers questions about informed consent, information privacy, and justice in this very specific kind of human subjects research.</p>","PeriodicalId":38034,"journal":{"name":"AMA journal of ethics","volume":"27 10","pages":"E737-742"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMA journal of ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2025.737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Undiagnosed Diseases Network is a national consortium of clinicians and researchers working to promote diagnostic research and accurately diagnose patients with rare diseases, many of whose conditions have long gone undiagnosed. This endeavor's importance should not, however, stop us from asking good ethics and policy questions about whether and when N-of-1 diagnostic research is justifiable. This article poses and considers questions about informed consent, information privacy, and justice in this very specific kind of human subjects research.

UDN N-of-1企业在道德上是否合理?
未确诊疾病网络是一个由临床医生和研究人员组成的全国性联盟,致力于促进诊断研究并准确诊断患有罕见疾病的患者,其中许多疾病长期未被诊断出来。然而,这项努力的重要性不应阻止我们就N-of-1诊断研究是否合理以及何时合理提出良好的伦理和政策问题。这篇文章提出并考虑了关于知情同意、信息隐私和正义在这种非常具体的人类受试者研究中的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AMA journal of ethics
AMA journal of ethics Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The AMA Journal of Ethics exists to help medical students, physicians and all health care professionals navigate ethical decisions in service to patients and society. The journal publishes cases and expert commentary, medical education articles, policy discussions, peer-reviewed articles for journal-based and audio CME, visuals, and more. Since its inception as an editorially-independent journal, we promote ethics inquiry as a public good.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书