{"title":"Clear Aligner Attachments: A Comprehensive Review.","authors":"Artun Yangın, Hasan Camcı, Mehmet Soybelli","doi":"10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2025.2025.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clear aligner therapy has gained significant popularity in orthodontics due to its aesthetic advantages and patient comfort. However, achieving complex and precise tooth movements with aligners often necessitates the use of auxiliary features such as attachments. This review explores the biomechanical role of attachments in clear aligner therapy and evaluates their effectiveness in facilitating various orthodontic tooth movements, including rotation, extrusion, intrusion, torque, distalization, and arch expansion. Attachments serve as critical components for enhancing force delivery, ensuring aligner retention, and improving the predictability of tooth movement. The morphology, quantity, and positioning of attachments have a direct impact on movement efficiency, patient comfort, and overall treatment success. The article highlights the importance of selecting appropriate attachment shapes (such as rectangular, ellipsoidal, or optimized designs) based on the intended movement. It emphasizes the relevance of strategic placement relative to the tooth's center of resistance. Furthermore, for cases requiring complex or combined movements, strategies such as phased treatment planning and the use of multiple or combined attachments are discussed. While optimized attachments have shown biomechanical advantages in some movements, clinical studies suggest that in many instances, their superiority over conventional attachments is not statistically significant, leaving the choice of design largely to clinician preference. This review underscores the necessity of individualized attachment planning to optimize biomechanics and improve treatment outcomes in aligner-based orthodontics.</p>","PeriodicalId":37013,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"38 3","pages":"177-189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12485647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2025.2025.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Clear aligner therapy has gained significant popularity in orthodontics due to its aesthetic advantages and patient comfort. However, achieving complex and precise tooth movements with aligners often necessitates the use of auxiliary features such as attachments. This review explores the biomechanical role of attachments in clear aligner therapy and evaluates their effectiveness in facilitating various orthodontic tooth movements, including rotation, extrusion, intrusion, torque, distalization, and arch expansion. Attachments serve as critical components for enhancing force delivery, ensuring aligner retention, and improving the predictability of tooth movement. The morphology, quantity, and positioning of attachments have a direct impact on movement efficiency, patient comfort, and overall treatment success. The article highlights the importance of selecting appropriate attachment shapes (such as rectangular, ellipsoidal, or optimized designs) based on the intended movement. It emphasizes the relevance of strategic placement relative to the tooth's center of resistance. Furthermore, for cases requiring complex or combined movements, strategies such as phased treatment planning and the use of multiple or combined attachments are discussed. While optimized attachments have shown biomechanical advantages in some movements, clinical studies suggest that in many instances, their superiority over conventional attachments is not statistically significant, leaving the choice of design largely to clinician preference. This review underscores the necessity of individualized attachment planning to optimize biomechanics and improve treatment outcomes in aligner-based orthodontics.