Research in psychoanalysis across theory and practice: a systematic literature review.

IF 2.3 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Cristina Marogna, Ciro De Vincenzo, Klodjana Lleshi, Elisa Paluan, Andrea Viecelli Giannotti
{"title":"Research in psychoanalysis across theory and practice: a systematic literature review.","authors":"Cristina Marogna, Ciro De Vincenzo, Klodjana Lleshi, Elisa Paluan, Andrea Viecelli Giannotti","doi":"10.4081/ripppo.2025.861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present systematic review of the literature aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the state of the art of research in psychoanalysis. The arguments draw a difference between psychoanalytic research and research in psychoanalysis, meaning that in the past decades, there has been an attempt to bridge the gaps between psychoanalysis and broader research in psychology. Major scientific databases for contemporary psychological research (Ebsco PsycINFO, Ebsco CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and PEP-Web) were searched to gather psychoanalytic-oriented research, both theoretical and empirical. The PRIMA method provided a total of 36 results, on which a conceptual/reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. The identified themes or dimensions are: i) the epistemological status of psychoanalysis; ii) the research domains in psychoanalysis; iii) the research methodology in psychoanalysis; iv) the research methods in psychoanalysis; and v) the instruments of research in psychoanalysis. We conclude that, despite long-lasting difficulties in the epistemological cohabitation between psychoanalysis and mainstream psychological research, new hybrid ways for future psychoanalysis can be identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":44262,"journal":{"name":"Research in Psychotherapy-Psychopathology Process and Outcome","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Psychotherapy-Psychopathology Process and Outcome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2025.861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present systematic review of the literature aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the state of the art of research in psychoanalysis. The arguments draw a difference between psychoanalytic research and research in psychoanalysis, meaning that in the past decades, there has been an attempt to bridge the gaps between psychoanalysis and broader research in psychology. Major scientific databases for contemporary psychological research (Ebsco PsycINFO, Ebsco CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and PEP-Web) were searched to gather psychoanalytic-oriented research, both theoretical and empirical. The PRIMA method provided a total of 36 results, on which a conceptual/reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. The identified themes or dimensions are: i) the epistemological status of psychoanalysis; ii) the research domains in psychoanalysis; iii) the research methodology in psychoanalysis; iv) the research methods in psychoanalysis; and v) the instruments of research in psychoanalysis. We conclude that, despite long-lasting difficulties in the epistemological cohabitation between psychoanalysis and mainstream psychological research, new hybrid ways for future psychoanalysis can be identified.

跨理论与实践的精神分析研究:系统的文献综述。
目前对文献的系统回顾旨在提供对精神分析研究艺术状态的全面概述。这些争论在精神分析研究和精神分析研究之间划出了差异,这意味着在过去的几十年里,人们一直试图弥合精神分析和更广泛的心理学研究之间的差距。我们检索了当代心理学研究的主要科学数据库(Ebsco PsycINFO、Ebsco CINAHL、Scopus、Web of Science、PubMed和PEP-Web),收集了以精神分析为导向的理论和实证研究。PRIMA方法共提供了36个结果,并对这些结果进行了概念/反思性专题分析。确定的主题或维度是:i)精神分析的认识论地位;Ii)精神分析的研究领域;Iii)精神分析的研究方法;精神分析学的研究方法;第五,精神分析研究的工具。我们的结论是,尽管精神分析与主流心理学研究在认识论上的共存存在长期困难,但可以确定未来精神分析的新混合方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
18.50%
发文量
28
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信